Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:53 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [17]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [6]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
1,111
 [4]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 1,111
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
analytica233
Joined: 04 Aug 2019
Last visit: 15 Nov 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Given Kudos: 745
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, Strategy
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
WE:Research (Other)
Products:
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 62
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Oscar: I have been accused of plagiarizing the work of Ethel Myers in my recent article. But that accusation is unwarranted. Although I admit I used passages from Myers’s book without attribution, Myers gave me permission in private correspondence to do so.

Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.

Which of the following principles, if established, would justify Oscar’s judgment?

(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.

(B) The writer of an article must cite the source of all passages that were not written by that writer if those passages are more than a few sentences long.

(C) Plagiarism is never justified, but writers are justified in occasionally quoting without attribution the work of other writers if the work quoted has not been published.

(D) An author is entitled to quote freely without attribution the work of a writer if that writer relinquishes his or her exclusive right to the material.

(E) Authors are entitled to quote without attribution passages that they themselves have written and published in other books or articles.
 

(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.
(A) is incorrect because Oscar's argument is not about QUOTING but about USING passages from another author's book WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION. (D) is correct because if Myers gave Oscars permission to do so, it means that Myers relinquishes his/her exclusive right to the material: Oscars can use Myer's material as Oscar's.­
User avatar
nikitamaheshwari
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 12 Feb 2022
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 77
Kudos: 6
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If we reverse the sentence, that is what we do in no cause and no effect. In choice A,
A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.
A writer has the right to quote passage from another published source if the author has granted permission - then this seems correct???

Also, in D option the author has not given away his right for the material - hence, seems incorrect to me.

Can you please explain ?
GMATNinja karishma

Regards
Nikita
User avatar
nikitamaheshwari
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 12 Feb 2022
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 77
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain Ans Choice A?

If we reverse the sentence- The author does have right to quote with the permission. Just like we do in Strengthen case where no cause no effect = cause effect.

Similarly, if we do similar thing in this Option choice A, the option seems correct.
Can you please explain where I am going wrong

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
User avatar
ashutosh_73
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Posts: 234
Kudos: 1,637
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
nikitamaheshwari
Can someone explain Ans Choice A?

If we reverse the sentence- The author does have right to quote with the permission. Just like we do in Strengthen case where no cause no effect = cause effect.

Similarly, if we do similar thing in this Option choice A, the option seems correct.
Can you please explain where I am going wrong

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja

Option (A) says "If no permission, no right to quote."

This does NOT imply "if permission, then right to quote".

If A, then B
implies
- A leads to B
- Not B leads to not A (here it means "if there is right to quote, it means there is permission")

It does not imply 'Not A leads to Not B'.


Hi KarishmaB,

Please help to understand option (A) in order to eliminate it. I think, my understanding is not correct:

(A) says '' If no permission --> no right to quote
and its contrapositive will be, if right to quote --> i have the permisson.

As per the stimulus, Oscar had the permission to quote.
Since having the permission is the necessary condition for ''right to quote'' to exist, cannot i conclude that Oscar had the ''right to quote''? will not it strengthen the argument?

I have messed it up!!

Thanks
Ashutosh
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ashutosh_73
KarishmaB
nikitamaheshwari
Can someone explain Ans Choice A?

If we reverse the sentence- The author does have right to quote with the permission. Just like we do in Strengthen case where no cause no effect = cause effect.

Similarly, if we do similar thing in this Option choice A, the option seems correct.
Can you please explain where I am going wrong

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja

Option (A) says "If no permission, no right to quote."

This does NOT imply "if permission, then right to quote".

If A, then B
implies
- A leads to B
- Not B leads to not A (here it means "if there is right to quote, it means there is permission")

It does not imply 'Not A leads to Not B'.


Hi KarishmaB,

Please help to understand option (A) in order to eliminate it. I think, my understanding is not correct:

(A) says '' If no permission --> no right to quote
and its contrapositive will be, if right to quote --> i have the permisson.

As per the stimulus, Oscar had the permission to quote.
Since having the permission is the necessary condition for ''right to quote'' to exist, cannot i conclude that Oscar had the ''right to quote''? will not it strengthen the argument?

I have messed it up!!

Thanks
Ashutosh

You are correct that 'having permission' is a necessary condition to 'right to quote.'
But note that necessary condition is just that - necessary. It may not be sufficient. 'Permission' is necessary but it may not be sufficient to quote so I cannot say whether I have the right to quote or not. I NEEDED permission, I got it. But is it enough? I don't know. Perhaps I NEED something else too.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,720
Kudos: 2,258
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Oscar: I have been accused of plagiarizing the work of Ethel Myers in my recent article. But that accusation is unwarranted. Although I admit I used passages from Myers’s book without attribution, Myers gave me permission in private correspondence to do so.

Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.

Which of the following principles, if established, would justify Oscar’s judgment?

(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so. - WRONG. Exactly the opposite to what we are looking for. It is claim against Oscar.

(B) The writer of an article must cite the source of all passages that were not written by that writer if those passages are more than a few sentences long. - WRONG. True for future publications but not for this. In a way, it is again a reiteration of Millie saud.

(C) Plagiarism is never justified, but writers are justified in occasionally quoting without attribution the work of other writers if the work quoted has not been published. - WRONG. Crux of this is again same as that of A and B.

(D) An author is entitled to quote freely without attribution the work of a writer if that writer relinquishes his or her exclusive right to the material. - CORRECT. POE helps. It is what Oscar needs to stand justified.

(E) Authors are entitled to quote without attribution passages that they themselves have written and published in other books or articles. - WRONG. Changes the perspective of the passage altogether.

Answer D.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts