Under normal circumstances, the more competition in an industry, the lower the prices that consumers pay for that industry's products. But surgery patients in hospitals in the most competitive market are likely to pay more per hospital stay than are surgery patients in less competitive hospital markets.
Pre Thinking – There can be some other factors which added is resulting this paradox such as patients prefer the expensive ones.
Which of the following, if true, LEAST contributes to an explanation of the apparent paradox described above?
Okay, So it asks for Paradox(X){Except Problem}
A. The cost of living in the most competitive hospital markets is considerably higher than the national average
So, The cost of living itself is higher in the areas with most competitive hospital markets. So, the comparison doesn’t stay good.
B. Hospitals tend to respond to competition by buying expensive diagnostic equipment, the cost of which is passed on to patients.
The Cost is higher because the hospital is paying for such things which may/may not required and is passing down these costs to patients.
C. If given a choice, surgery patients avoid those hospitals whose cost containment strategies include such practices as refurbishing patients' rooms less frequently.
Patients are avoiding the cheaper ones. So they are paying more despite the market being more competitive.
D. Now that many simple surgeries can be performed safely in any qualified physician's office, most surgeries performed in hospitals are both serious and expensive.
Okay, So what? Can’t really help why the cost difference is there.
E. In the most competitive markets, physicians tend to keep postoperative patients in the hospital longer than do physicians in less competitive markets.
So they are staying for long(added costs), hence they are paying more per hospital stay despite the hospital being in more competitive market.