Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 05:12 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 05:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
25,505
 [75]
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 273
Kudos: 25,505
 [75]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
70
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,388
Own Kudos:
53,601
 [15]
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,388
Kudos: 53,601
 [15]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AP5300
Joined: 13 Jun 2023
Last visit: 07 Jul 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
24
 [15]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 15
Kudos: 24
 [15]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
687
 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 319
Kudos: 687
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1)B, News organizations' ability to cover sports news effectively will be hampered if their use of online audio, video, and images is prohibited,since denying so would hamper their right to cover the news.

2)a)No,since the sport authority is not agreeing on that.
b)Yes,it is acceptable
c)No, that's not the point out forward by sports authority

3)a)No,this point cannot be inferred
b)Yes,this is a point of disagreement
c)Yes this is a point of disagreement between both the parties

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
SKGM
Joined: 27 Jun 2022
Last visit: 17 Sep 2024
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
10
 [5]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q40 V28
GMAT 1: 570 Q40 V28
Posts: 20
Kudos: 10
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3rd part of the 3rd question:

News organizations spokesperson mentions: ''to place unnecessary conditions on that coverage is to deny news organizations their right to cover the news." It can be inferred that the spokesperson is against the imposition of any condition.

Whereas, sports association spokesperson mentions: "Conditions must be placed on these practices". Here, he/she is supporting imposition of condition.

That means both are not holding views/ criteria regarding conditions or what constitute those conditions. They are totally yes and no situation. Both spokespersons are in totally different sets without any overlapping. So, there is no opposing views regarding "The conditions under which a news organization should be allowed access to report on the sports association's events."


Tricky
User avatar
anushree01
Joined: 06 Apr 2024
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 180
Products:
Posts: 251
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution, its helpful.
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 325
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Products:
Posts: 325
Kudos: 105
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the 3rd statement...
News Organisations say they have right to cover the news? Means it should be free of cost and unconditional. If I have a right to something that means its unconditional and free.

Sports Assoc says that there should be conditions that can be discussed...

So No Matter what the conditions are, there is disagreement over the conditions.... This is my understanding please help....
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 256
Kudos: 314
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The sports association only had a problem with news outlets updating scores and posting video clips. While they have the rights to the terms of the coverage, it doesn't say they disagree with every condition nor that they want to renegotiate.
Aboyhasnoname
In the 3rd statement...
News Organisations say they have right to cover the news? Means it should be free of cost and unconditional. If I have a right to something that means its unconditional and free.

Sports Assoc says that there should be conditions that can be discussed...

So No Matter what the conditions are, there is disagreement over the conditions.... This is my understanding please help....
User avatar
Usernamevisible
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,282
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Requesting help with Q3 - Statement 3 - unable to understand

My doubt is sports association says if media complies with conditions such as their reporting we will allow access to event; media says there should not be any such conditions

Thus looks like they disagree
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Usernamevisible,

I can see exactly where this feels like a disagreement, and your read of the two quotes is fair. But the trap here lives in one word in the news organizations' statement, and it's the same word cheshire was pointing at above.

Let's line up what each side actually says:

- Sports association: "Conditions must be placed on these practices" - it wants conditions.
- News organizations: "to place unnecessary conditions ... is to deny news organizations their right to cover the news."

Notice the news organizations do not say "no conditions ever." They object to unnecessary conditions. That word quietly leaves the door open to conditions that are necessary. So they are not flatly rejecting all conditions - which means we don't have two clean, opposing yes/no positions.

Why this matters for issue (3): the issue is phrased as the conditions under which access should be allowed - i.e., what those conditions are. To mark Disagree, we'd need the two sides to stake out opposing positions on that. But since the news organizations accept that some (necessary) conditions could exist, and the association never says reporting shouldn't happen at all, their positions overlap rather than clash. That's why it's Cannot infer disagreement.

Contrast this with issue 2, the live-score frequency one - there the news orgs demand "any time-frame" (i.e., unlimited), and the association explicitly wants limits. That is a true head-to-head clash, so it's Disagree.

A quick word-play test to feel it:

- If the news orgs had said "any conditions deny our rights" - now they oppose all conditions - Disagree.
- But they said "unnecessary conditions" - room for some conditions - no clear clash.

One qualifying word decides whether the positions collide. That's the reading skill this question is testing.

Answer: Cannot infer disagreement, Disagree, Cannot infer disagreement

Usernamevisible
Requesting help with Q3 - Statement 3 - unable to understand

My doubt is sports association says if media complies with conditions such as their reporting we will allow access to event; media says there should not be any such conditions

Thus looks like they disagree
Moderators:
Math Expert
113032 posts
DI Forum Moderator
410 posts