Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time

Question

Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1) 
 For SC butler Questions  Click Here

Paranthropus are a group of hominids  that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines  and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines

D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines

E) existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines

generis · Accepted Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)

THE PROMPT

Quote:

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

This question tests verb tenses, parallelism, elliptical construction, substitution, and logic.

You could easily overthink this question.
You can avoid overthinking by moving your eyes to the next option.

No kidding. Simply switching gears may get you out of "freeze" mode. Switching gears may help activate your parasympathetic nervous system, which counters stress.

Eliminate the four worst answers. Do not search for what you think is a perfect answer.
If you cannot decide whether to eliminate an option within a few seconds, keep it tentatively and move on.
You will find clearly incorrect answers to eliminate if you keep going.

THE OPTIONS

Quote:

A) Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus [existed].

• I see no errors

• Meaning? Very simple.
Paranthropus, Australopithicus, and "some other" hominid species all existed at the same time.

• Parallelism?
Does this option create a lack of parallelism because Paranthropus is followed by a verb whereas Australopithicus and some other species of the Homo genus are not [followed by a verb]?

→ No. This option can be rewritten as I have done in the highlighted version above.

-- The sentence is parallel because the nouns on the other side of "at the same time as" are followed by the verb existed even though the verb is not actually written out the second time.
-- (More on why the word is not written out in a moment.)
-- The noun/verb structure is maintained.

→ Ellipsis
We can and often should omit words that are "common" to (shared by) both parts of the sentence.
-- In this case, the verb existed is omitted from the actual text but [the verb existed is] implied by its presence in the
first part of the sentence.

-- We use this omission to make our writing or speech concise.

-- This structure is called ellipsis, elliptical construction, or occasionally, elision.

-- As I mentioned, those omitted words are implied and thus [those omitted words] are "still there" in the strict sense.

In a few sentences above, I used omissions, which are indicated by text in brackets that I could leave out of those sentences.

• In short, the word existed does not need to be repeated.
See Notes, below.
KEEP A

Quote:

B) Paranthropus are a group of hominids that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

• had existed is incorrect in both instances
→ we use the past perfect tense had existed to depict the earlier of two past events
→ These groups—Paranthropus, Australopithecines, and "some others"—existed at the same time.

→ In addition, we do not use past perfect (had + __ED) when simple past will suffice
Wrong: He had called a cab.
Correct: He called a cab.
ELIMINATE B

Quote:

C) Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

• we cannot use had as a substitute for existed.

→ IF the original verb contains had, then we can repeat just the "had" part later in the sentence
-- Correct: When the train lurched, people in the aisles stumbled, but I had sat down by then, as had Daniel.

→ If the original verb does not contain had as an auxiliary, and we want to use a shortened verb phrase, we use did or did so.
Correct: The train seemed unsteady, so I sat down, as did Daniel.

• had is not needed because past perfect is inappropriate, and
• had cannot be used as a substitute for existed
ELIMINATE C

Quote:

D) Paranthropus are a group of hominids existing at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

• existing does not fit with the timeline in which at least three hominid groups existed at the same time between two and four million years ago.

• we speak about scientific facts with present tense verbs such as are, but because we are talking about a historical fact, that part should be rendered in past tense.

The present participle existing is confusing and illogical.

→ existing should be changed to that existed

ELIMINATE D

Quote:

E) Paranthropus are a group of hominids existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

• existing presents the same problems as those in option D.

• The problem may be exacerbated in (E) because the present participle existing is placed right before past tense "were the Australopithecines. . .."

• and what is this "were" word supposed to be doing? What verb is were drawing upon?
→ no were existing is present.
-- We cannot repeat an elided verb that never existed in the first place
-- That is, we cannot shorten were existing to were because were existing never showed up in the first place
-- Besides, 99.9% of the time were existing is horrible English and you will never see that phrasing on the GMAT
ELIMINATE E

The correct answer is (A)

Notes

Heads up: Feel free to skip this section if you are just starting to study or if you are not aiming for a high Verbal score and you become frustrated.

This material is dense and very difficult to present in a Butler post.

Ellipsis - omission of words

→ In English, in the second part of a sentence, we often do not repeat simple verbs.
-- Correct: Samuel cooks breakfast more often than Safia.
-- Meaning: Samuel cooks breakfast more often than Safia cooks breakfast.

No confusion exists because we know that Samuel does not cook Safia, for breakfast or otherwise.

-- The verb existed in option A is similarly simple. Omitting existed does not create confusion if you understand that such omission is common.

→ when can we omit a verb or verb phrase? Answer: On the GMAT, we can frequently do so as long as the sentence still makes sense.

We could not say, for example, "My brother likes Greek food more than my sister."
-- That sentence is ambiguous. It could mean:
(1) My brother likes Greek food more than he likes my sister, or
(2) My brother likes Greek food more than my sister likes Greek food.

Because the verb phrase is simple and short, we could simply add the word "does": My brother likes Greek food more than my sister does.

Now we are using does to stand in for "likes Greek food" and clear up any confusion.

The verb do can stand in for almost any verb in English.

When we use do in this way, we are not using pure ellipsis (omission). We are using ellipsis and substitution.

Substitution -- omission and replacement of words

When we use substitution, we replace a word or an entire phrase in one part of a sentence by a shorter "filler" word or phrase in another part of the sentence.

These shortened words or phrases "stand in" for the omitted words.

→ Nouns
We can shorten sentences by using noun ("nominal") substitution, this way:
The weekly ROI meeting was scheduled at midday and disrupted the whole workday, so we should schedule the next one early in the day.
The noun "one" = the weekly financial strategy meeting

→ Verbs

-- My brother got married before my sister got married.
==>>
-- My brother got
married before my sister did..
-- did = got married

→ Special substitution: do and do so

We can use the verb do (does, did, etc.) to substitute for almost any verb.*
-- She walks faster than I do.

Along similar lines, do so can stand in for almost any verb phrase.
-- When Lisa hired me to review her essay, she asked me to edit her work exactly as I edit professional writing, and I did so.
-- did so = edited her work exactly as I edit professional writing

Had?
Can we use "had" as a stand in verb?

No. We can repeat the auxiliary verb had and omit the main verb, but in that case, we are not substituting. We are omitting. This construction is rare on the GMAT and often inverted in the second clause.
-- By the end of WWII, the Soviet Union had lost more than 20 million people, as had only one other country--China.
-- had = lost more than 20 million people

Past perfect
Past perfect is often described as "the past of the past."

Event ABC happened in the past.
Before event ABC, event XYZ happened.

long time ago__|XYZ|___|ABC|__now

Event ABC takes the simple past verb tense.
Event XYZ takes the past perfect verb tense.

→ past perfect construction: HAD + past participle (verbED)
→ Correct: Luckily, as I pulled out of the driveway, I remembered that I had forgotten to lock the door.

→ We do not use past perfect when simple past tense will suffice.

→ Finally, in order to use past perfect, the sentence must contain at least one event that is rendered in simple past, or a time stamp that marks off a later-in-time event, or a context that does the same thing.

We need a discrete past that is "marked off in time" in order to talk about what came before that time.

AS

KaramveerBakshi , in answer to your question, first

→ As is not always followed by a clause.
Role: She went to the Halloween party dressed as Neytiri from Avatar.
Equals: Though we are not related, I think of her as my sister.
Stage: As a teenager, he contracted chicken pox.

→ We can omit verbs and the implied verbs are still "there," as are the clauses

On this point, I am going to quote Mike McGarry, because he gets away with a lot more snark than I do, at least for now:

Quote:

Parallelism: A told B about X at lunch on Monday, and about Y on Wednesday, but on Friday C told A that X and Y are not true.

Is this correct? YES! Is the part “.. and about Y on Wednesday …” a full clause? YES. It is a full clause, properly in parallel, despite the fact that many common words, including the subject and verb of this clause, have been omitted. Don’t look at one little piece of real estate in the sentence and conclude: something’s wrong here, because I don’t see a subject and a verb right here. You always have to look at the whole flow of the sentence, and ask yourself whether words that appear to be missing in the second branch of parallelism are implied by the first branch. Parallelism is a large organizing structure, relating different parts of the sentence to each other. (My emphasis)

KaramveerBakshi , I'm glad that you brought up the issue. I'd bet that other people had the same question.

In option A, this as IS followed by a clause. The verb in that clause, existed, is implied; existed is "there" but hidden.

SUGGESTION

Parallelism, ellipsis, and substitution can be challenging.

I suggest that most or all of you read two of Mike McGarry's blog posts. Three minutes each. (Okay. I read quickly. Ten minutes each.)

(1) Dropping Common Words in Parallel on the GMAT, which you can find here, and

(2) Repeating Verb Phrases on the GMAT, which you can find here.

COMMENTS

harrywm , daniformic , and Babineaux , welcome to SC Butler.

As always, I am glad to see everyone.

Random facts:
Today is the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples.
Today is also National Book Lovers Day in the U.S.
I think yesterday was National Beer Day. I don't like beer. I've tried to like beer.
I do like books. A lot. I don't have to try, either.

So, my nascent bibliophiles, I am going to remind you all yet again: read. Every day. Find 10 minutes.
Read novels. Read the highbrow stuff, but read books with great stories in them, too.

Love the task.
Or learn to love the task.
Reading? Learning? Perhaps the task even becomes a labor of love.

This SC question?
Labeling (e.g. "pronoun error") is not explanation. Assertion (e.g. "not correct") is not explanation.
Kudos go to those who reasoned well, got the correct answer, or both—and who also explained.
This question is hard. Nicely done.

*The verb "do" (does, did, etc.) cannot act as a substitute for
(1) to be verbs
Wrong: I was learning French, and he did, too.
Correct: I was learning French, and he was, too.
Correct: I was learning French, as was he.

(2) to have when have is a helping verb (i.e., when have does not mean "owned, possessed, or experienced")
Wrong: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, and he did, too.
Correct: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, and he had, too.
Correct: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, as had he.
Correct but not likely to be seen on the GMAT: I had plenty of Euros, and he did, too. (We can use "did" in this case because had is not an auxiliary verb. Rather, had is a main verb that means "possessed.")

As always, I am glad to see everyone. Random facts: Today is the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples. Today is also National Book Lovers Day in the U.S. I think yesterday was National Beer Day. I don't like beer. I've tried to like beer. I do like books. A lot. I don't have to try, either. So, my nascent bibliophiles, I am going to remind you all yet again: read . Every day. Find 10 minutes. Read novels. Read the highbrow stuff, but read books with great stories in them, too. Love the task. Or learn to love the task. Reading? Learning? Perhaps the task even becomes a labor of love. This SC question? Labeling (e.g. "pronoun error") is not explanation. Assertion (e.g. "not correct") is not explanation. Kudos go to those who reasoned well, got the correct answer, or both—and who also explained. This question is hard. Nicely done. *The verb "do" (does, did, etc.) cannot act as a substitute for (1) to be verbs Wrong: I was learning French, and he did, too. Correct: I was learning French, and he was, too. Correct: I was learning French, as was he. (2) to have when have is a helping verb (i.e., when have does not mean "owned, possessed, or experienced") Wrong: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, and he did, too. Correct: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, and he had, too. Correct: By the time dessert arrived, I had eaten too much, as had he. Correct but not likely to be seen on the GMAT: I had plenty of Euros, and he did, too. (We can use "did" in this case because had is not an auxiliary verb. Rather, had is a main verb that means "possessed.")

tyildirim92 · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids  that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines  and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines // "as" needs a sentence (at least a subject and a verb)

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines // correct

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines // one simple past tense and one past perfect tense and at the same time?? Not logical.

D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines // "as" needs a sentence (at least a subject and a verb)

E) existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines // continuous tense is awkward here.

Footnote: I have the exam tomorrow. Wish me good luck.

Posted from my mobile device

Soumya200011 · Answer

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines- Correct.

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines- "existed " indicates past,in "had existed"... had is unecessary.

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines- gramatically wrong, the word "had" is wrong.

D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines.- Usage of" existing " continuous tense is wrong.

E)  existing  at the same time as  were  the Australopithecines.- "existing " and "were".. wrong.

IMO A.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

yashikaaggarwal · Answer

We are talking about the past here, using ing participle is wrong, we can directly eliminate D and E option.

Had existed is the past perfect tense interpreting the past before simple past, the author is intended to show the similar time when the mentioned species used to exist. 
If we talk about the past perfect we need simple past to show the consecutive past series which is not available,
C use simple past first than past perfect when it has to be opposite,
B used past perfect both time breaking the consecutive past sequence.
Hence A is best Option.

Answer is A

Posted from my mobile device

Babineaux · Answer

C) that existed at the same time as had (existed) the Australopithecines-- correct

IMO C.

Posted from my mobile device

Nipungupta9081 · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines - Seems right. ( ✔ )

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines - One ' had ' makes it clear we are talking about the past. Doesn't really seem to use it 2 times. But still a option we can consider.

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines - Had is not rightly used here. ( X )

D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines - Exisiting used is wrong. ( X )

E) existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines - ' as were ' ( X )
 
confused between A & B . Will Go with A.

Varunsawhney8 · Answer

Eliminate
It means it is still existing which is i think not the case

Ranasaymon · Answer

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines   Correct

=>Comparison: Paranthropus vs Australopithecines vs some other species of homo genus
=> It's a one time event in past. The sentence correctly use simple past

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines    Incorrect

=> Past perfect is used to denote sequence of related events in past. In this sentence, only one event in past exist. So, no need to use past perfect

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines    Incorrect

=> Both species existed at the same time in past. There is no sequence of event in past. Both parts should be in simple past form.

D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines    Incorrect

=> Meaning error: If we use verb-ing modifier in this case, the meaning will be changed. There will be no trace that species existed in the past.

E) existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines    Incorrect

=> Same error exists as in D

HoneyLemon · Answer

imo  A  
This is really simple but confusing question .. Not sure whether I got it right . but similar to ... I existed at the same time as you (existed) .

Paranthropus are a group of hominids  that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines  and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines 
 --  correct  comparison .. (existed is used in ellipses )
 
B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines
 -- had existed is not necessary 
 
C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines
 -- Wrong.. usage of had. Wrong parallelism .. . 
 
D) existing at the same time as the Australopithecines
 -- Existing is wrong 
 E) existing at the same time as were the Australopithecines
 -- Existing is wrong

elavendan1 · Answer

Answer is A. 
B and C have tense issues , while D and E did use participle, which is not appropriate here.

monk123 · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.
 
POE:
Stop sign- 'as', comparison question. We need to compare time with time.
Eliminate (A) - comparison issue.
Eliminate (B), (D) & ( E) - tense error.
 
A) that existed  at the same time  as  the Australopithecines

B) that  had  existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines -  CORRECT

D)  existing  at the same time as the Australopithecines

E)  existing  at the same time as were the Australopithecines

daniformic · Answer

As can be used to comprare clauses and each element of the comparison needs its own verb:

C) that existed at the same time  as had  the Australopithecines -  IMHO -> C

agar123 · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines ----> Correct. Paranthropus existed at the same time as the Australopithecines .

B) that  had  existed at the same time as  had  the Australopithecines ---> Use of the past perfect tense is wrong.

C) that existed at the same time as  had  the Australopithecines -----> Changed the meaning, as Australopithecines didn't exist before Paranthropus

D)  existing  at the same time as the Australopithecines ---> Use of existing is wrong

E)  existing  at the same time as  were  the Australopithecines ----> existing(adjective) is not parallel to verb were.

vivek2611 · Answer

B & C past perfect is not needed
D&E existing is incorrect.

IMO A - looks best of the lot. I must say I was questioning the compaison and looking for parallelism in the second half of the sentence.

generis · Answer

tyildirim92 
From about halfway around the world, good luck wish sent!

winterschool · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

A) that  existed  at the same time as  the Australopithecines

Incorrect - comparison between existed and the Australopithecines

B) that  had existed at the same time  as had the Australopithecines

Incorrect - "had existed at the same time" not logical

had existed or existed at the same time

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines

correct  -

D)  existing  at the same time as the Australopithecines

Incorrect - tense problem

E)  existing  at the same time as were the Australopithecines

Incorrect - same as D

KaramveerBakshi · Answer

generis

Could you please post the OA?

I have a doubt in A. How is 'as' not followed by a clause? Shouldn't that be incorrect?

If anyone cam help.

Thanks.

harrywm · Answer

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines and some other species of the Homo genus.

Question is basically stating that Paranthropus and Australopithecines existed at the same time in the past. So simple past can define the relationship as there is no sequence of events

A) that existed at the same time as the Australopithecines - Simple Past used no problem with the answer choice

B) that had existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines - Incorrect due to past perfect

C) that existed at the same time as had the Australopithecines - Incorrect due to past perfect

D)  existing  at the same time as the Australopithecines - incorrect

E)  existing  at the same time as  were the  Australopithecines - Incorrect

generis · Answer

The official explanation has been posted above.
I am not used to this new format and am not sure whether I have the correct link, but I think that the OE is  here .

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Paranthropus are a group of hominids that existed at the same time

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards