Let's Break down the sentences -
1. Although the creation of smaller electronic products and devices saves power, such miniaturization may not always
provide higher value >>
an opinion of the author that Miniaturization always does not provide higher value.2. as can be seen in the case of state of the art 22nm processors from Intel which consume 30% less power but do not last as long as the comparable 45nm processors from AMD as they prevent electrical disturbances from damaging the processor thus reducing the need to replace them ever so often.
>>
It is an Example for the opinion mentioned above.3. Therefore, data centers that seek to lower overall costs today are well advised to go with the AMD processors.
>> Main Conclusion of the Author. Analysis: The conclusion is far fetched. The example stated covers just one type of processors from each company (Intel and AMD) and using this example, the author comments upon the entire range of Processors.
Assumptions:1. The Processors stated in the example are the only processors that each company manufactures. (Processors are representative)
2. The costs of replacement are higher than the costs of added power consumption.
The author’s recommendation may be flawed because it fails to consider:
A. That AMD processors may not perform as well as Intel Processors do. >> Performance is Out of Scope.
B.Cost savings due to lower power consumption vs. the cost of replacement of processors. >> as per our Assumption
C. Whether the cost of processors has increased in the last few years or stayed more or less the same. >> Irrelevant
D. Whether data-centers that consume lower overall energy are seen favorably by governments. >> Government's View about data centres is out of scope.
E. Whether customers prefer Intel’s processors over AMD’s >> Customers Preference is Out of scope