OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPTQuote:
The C.E.O. of the nation’s largest real estate company has announced his resignation, cited his worsening health, and ended the reign of the man who held the top job longer than anyone else and under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth. • Meaning?
The CEO has announced his resignation in part because his health is worsening.
That resignation ended the CEO's long reign. Under his charge, the company grew into a behemoth.
• Issue
→ Well, the biggest issue is fairly subtle: you must recognize the way in which COMMA + participle phrase (a verbING phrase) is a good way to present the result or outcome of the previous clause.
GMAT writers really like these participle phrases placed in that role.
This participle usage is sophisticated.
→ Don't worry if you did not understand how to choose among A, C, and D.
You'll get a sense for these participial modifiers.
Read the explanation. Read
this blog post, here, and the comment section. THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) The C.E.O. of the nation’s largest real estate company has announced his resignation,
cited his worsening health, and
ended the reign of the man who held the top job longer than anyone else and under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth.
• Meaning issue
→ The CEO did not end the reign. The CEO's resignation ended the reign.
• Parallelism trap
→ From other options and from context, we can see that
announced, cited, and
ended do not need to be parallel. That setup is a trap.
→
cited his health makes more sense when rewritten as
citing his health. Per the latter, the resignation takes center stage in that phrasing.
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
B) The C.E.O. of the nation’s largest real estate company has announced his resignation
[,] citing his worsening health[,] to end the reign of the man who held the top job longer than anyone else and under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth.
• although infinitives do not always suggest purpose, in this context, the infinitive
to end does sound purposeful—and ridiculously so.
The CEO did not resign
in order to end his long reign. The end of his reign was simply a natural result of his resignation.
•
citing his health should probably be set off by commas
→ at the moment,
citing seems to be modifying
resignation, but citing
The verbING phrase carries much less weight than the verb
announced, is intended to explain the reason for the resignation, and without a preceding comma, seems to be modifying
resignation.
But the resignation is not citing his health. The CEO is doing so.
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) Citing his worsening health, the C.E.O. of the nation’s largest real estate company has announced his resignation, which ends the reign of the man
holding the top job longer than anyone else and
under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth.
•
holding and
under whose charge both define
man as essential modifiers, but they are not parallel
→
holding should be the restrictive relative pronoun construction
who held to match the restrictive relative pronoun construction
under whose charge the company grew. (
Whose is the only restrictive relative pronoun in the English language, btw)
→ this error is not horrible.
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
D) Citing his worsening health, the C.E.O. of the nation’s largest real estate company has announced his resignation, ending the reign of the man who held the top job longer than anyone else and under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth.
• I do not see any errors
→
ending the reign . . . refers logically to the outcome of the resignation
→
who held and
under whose charge are parallel restrictive (essential) relative modifiers
• Compared to options A and C? Option D wins.
Option D is not plagued with the issues, however small, in options A and C.
In terms of strategy, if we accept option A we almost certainly must accept option C and vice versa.
That situation is problematic. They can't both be correct.
Option D is better than options A and C. ELIMINATE A and C.
KEEP D.
Quote:
E)
Ending the reign of the man who held the top job longer than anyone else,
the C.E.O. of the nation’s largest
real estate company, under whose charge the company grew into a multibillion-dollar global behemoth, has announced his resignation citing his worsening health.
•
under whose charge is closer to
man in the other options and the modifier makes more sense that way.
→ in this option,
under whose charge could easily be mistaken as describing
the company rather than the man
• meaning issue
The CEO's resignation, not the CEO per se, is ending the reign of the CEO.
• compare to option D? Option D wins; it's not riddled with dubious or weird constructions
ELIMINATE E
The best answer is D.COMMENTSMakesh89 EDIT: and
Gknight5603 , welcome to SC Butler.
I am glad to see everyone, including a couple of people whom I haven't seen lately.
I like the dialogue.
These answers range from very good to excellent.
Critical reasoning skills are incisive. Impressive.
Nice work. Stay safe, everyone.