Bunuel wrote:
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition with Lots of FunIt will not be productive for the trading vessel the Selene to hire three new disciplinary officers, as proposed. The ship’s operational budget is sufficient to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional legal and bureaucratic employees needed to process the increased number of infractions typically generated by new officers.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
A. Studies have shown that having more disciplinary officers on board does not necessarily improve discipline among shipmates.
B. When another trading vessel of the same size as the Selene increased its number of disciplinary officers by twenty percent last year, there were forty-two percent more disciplinary infractions, and of them, twelve percent required legal action.
C. The Selene’s crew has reached the size at which an increase in the number of disciplinary officers will have a corrective effect on the discipline among shipmates.
D. On most ships, not every disciplinary infraction leads to punitive action, and not every punitive action necessitates legal proceedings.
E. If the funding needed to expand the crew of the Selene is increased, the budget of other ships in the company’s fleet will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
Expert's Global Official ExplanationMind-map: Trading vessel plans to hire three new disciplinary officers (DO) --> new DO usually generate infractions --> enough budget for DO salaries --> not enough budget for salaries of legal and bureaucratic employees required to process infractions --> the plan will not be productive (conclusion)
Missing-link: Between all the information presented and the conclusion that the plan will not be productive
Expectation from the correct answer choice: To suggest that the plan may be productive
A. This answer choice, suggesting that adding new disciplinary officers may not necessarily improve discipline, indicates that there will likely be
more infractions generated and so a
stronger need for new legal and bureaucratic employees; such a scenario, if anything,
marginally strengthens, rather than weakens, the conclusion that the plan will not be productive. Because this answer choice does not weaken the conclusion, this answer choice is incorrect.
B. This answer choice, providing evidence that, in another trading vessel, the addition of disciplinary officers led to an increase in infractions and legal action, indicates that, if the plan is followed, there will likely be
more infractions and so a
stronger need for new legal and bureaucratic employees; such a scenario, if anything,
strengthens, rather than weakens, the conclusion that the plan will not be productive. Because this answer choice does not weaken the conclusion, this answer choice is incorrect.
C. Correct. By suggesting that the addition of new disciplinary officers is likely to improve discipline, this answer choice indicates that there will likely be
fewer infractions generated and hence,
additional legal and bureaucratic employees may not be necessary; so, this answer choice suggests that the plan may be productive and weakens the conclusion. Because this answer choice weakens the conclusion, this answer choice is correct.
D. Trap. This answer choice, suggesting that not every disciplinary infraction leads to punitive action and legal proceedings, leaves open the possibility of a proportion of
additional disciplinary infractions leading to additional legal proceedings and, if anything,
marginally strengthens, rather than weakens, the conclusion that the plan will not be productive. Because this answer choice does not weaken the conclusion, this answer choice is incorrect.
E. The argument is concerned with the effect of the plan of hiring new disciplinary officers on the budget of Selene; so, the effect of the plan on the
budget of other ships is out of scope. Additionally, the argument mentions that the ship’s operational budget is sufficient to pay the salaries of the new officers; so, whether the budget of other ships needs to be reduced is out of scope. Because this answer choice does not weaken the conclusion, this answer choice is incorrect.
C is the best choice.