Hi abhikc3004,You've put your finger on exactly the hinge of this question. And yes, on the GMAT you should
not assume that "sending a deposit" is the same as "enrolling in classes."
Here's the logic behind that. Data Sufficiency runs on what the statements
literally tell you plus ordinary facts - never on an extra step you supply yourself. Statement
(2) says
80% of accepted students
send a deposit. It does
not say those depositors show up and register for classes. Real life backs this up: people put down deposits, then change their minds, go elsewhere, defer, or reclaim the deposit. The statement gives you no bridge from "sent a deposit" to "enrolled."
Because that bridge is missing, watch how the enrollment percentage can swing even when both statements hold. Start with
100 applicants:
-
(1) →
15 are accepted.
-
(2) →
12 of those send a deposit (
80% of
15).
Now the unknown step:
-
Case A: all
12 depositors enroll → enrollment is
12% of applicants.
-
Case B: only
6 of them actually enroll → enrollment is
6% of applicants.
Both cases obey statement
(1)and statement
(2), yet the answer to the question is different. Same statements, two different answers -
not sufficient, so the answer is
E.
The takeaway rule: in DS, only equate two things when the problem says they're equal. "Deposit" and "enroll" are different words, so treat them as different events - and the moment a needed link is left unstated, you can build two valid cases that disagree.
Answer: Eabhikc3004
Hey, are we to assume that sending a deposit is not the same thing as enrolling into class?