Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 12:20 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 12:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,752
Own Kudos:
810,651
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,822
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,752
Kudos: 810,651
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
asmba
Joined: 27 Nov 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
32
 [3]
Given Kudos: 126
Concentration: General Management, Human Resources
Posts: 42
Kudos: 32
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Priyanshu1810
Joined: 29 Sep 2022
Last visit: 04 Aug 2023
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mysterymanrog
User avatar
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 792
Own Kudos:
714
 [1]
Given Kudos: 559
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 792
Kudos: 714
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Priyanshu1810
I think D is wrong because it contradicts the fact present in the passage.
Also I thought that we have to give explanation for the new regulation of immigration not another one regarding employment for 10 years.
I can't find any one option to be best of 5
Can anybody please help

D does not really contradict any of the facts presented in the passage. D more or less tells you what type of effect the change in regulations might have - that people will now migrate to Xamlia rather than Marina. This is, as you pointed out, not sufficient for explaining the paradox. The paradox still remains unsolved even if this effect were true.
User avatar
mysterymanrog
User avatar
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 792
Own Kudos:
714
 [2]
Given Kudos: 559
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 792
Kudos: 714
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For paradox questions, it is useful to rephrase the question: Why would it be, given a change in immigration law, that the government expects unemployment to go down in the near future even though immigration is one of the causes of unemployment?

A) This could be a good choice. Keep for now.

B) This might be true, but it is too vague. Impacting the unemployment rate how? Does it impact in a way that it reduces, which would help solve the paradox, or does it impact in a way that increases the unemployment rate, which would deepen the paradox. This cannot be the answer, since it is not stated what type of impact there would be.

C) This is also a contender. Keep for now.

D) This is a possible effect of the change in migration law, but does not help resolve the paradox. Even if this were true, it does not impact the argument in any way.

E) This is a neat trap - notice that it says "in the past few years". This means that it cannot be the answer, since the law change was recent, and the government expects the change in unemployment to occur in the following months. This means that the partnerships with the top universities was there even before the law change, and since we know unemployment was high in the country even with these partnerships, it cannot be the reason why unemployment would go down in the following months.

A vs. C

C is very close to the answer, but it is further away than A. C tells us that many companies will now stop outsourcing certain types of jobs. This could very well be true, but not solve the paradox. Imagine a case where the citizens do not wish to take these jobs, would the unemployment reduce? No. We need to make the second assumption that the citizens will want to apply for these jobs for the expectation of the decrease in unemployment rate to be true.

A is much better than C. A directly tells us that, some people were seeking employment outside of the country but were not able to because of a law requiring them to work in Marina for at least 10 years. If this restriction was removed, then we can expect those people to seek jobs outside of the country, which would make the governments expectation of a decrease in unemployment rate somewhat more sound.

A is the correct answer.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts