Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 22:49 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 22:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,033
Own Kudos:
11,389
 [11]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,033
Kudos: 11,389
 [11]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HarshZsssh
Joined: 20 Aug 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 41
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
glagad
Joined: 03 Jun 2022
Last visit: 30 Mar 2026
Posts: 328
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V77 DI79
GPA: 8.98
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V77 DI79
Posts: 328
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DrMock
Joined: 08 Nov 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 126
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
GPA: 8.6
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
Posts: 58
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On Q3, I picked option E (and just as I clicked on to the next question, it hit me that it was too extreme). Couldn't go back and change it. Nevertheless, it was between A and E, and my initial thought was that the author mentions their position against technology being a driver in S1 - doesn't that translate to "most important factor" or given that no extreme markers are present that's not true?
User avatar
WhitEngagePrep
Joined: 12 Nov 2024
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: United States
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 58
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DrMock
On Q3, I picked option E (and just as I clicked on to the next question, it hit me that it was too extreme). Couldn't go back and change it. Nevertheless, it was between A and E, and my initial thought was that the author mentions their position against technology being a driver in S1 - doesn't that translate to "most important factor" or given that no extreme markers are present that's not true?
Just wanted to double check your logic for E. You said that "didn't the author mention their position against technology being a driver..." - and you're right. The author is actually making a statement that technology is NOT necessarily a driver of change when they combine the language that it is "sometimes described" that way YET it "has no momentum of its own." The rest of the paragraph and then the second paragraph are all building on that idea. In fact, Melman's study "illustrates this point." So what is the WHY behind including Melman's study (questions that ask "in order to" are asking about the why)? Well it must be to show that it isn't just technology, but lots of things that could be impacting production methods.

(E) support the contention that technology IS the most important factor in decisions concerning production methods
Capitalization and red font are MY emphasis, but this choice says that the author is including Melman to support the idea (contention) that technology IS THE most important, but we just saw that the passage says the opposite - that is might be just one of many if its a driver at all. Eliminate (and not because it is extreme, but because it is the opposite of what the passage says).

Your question seems to present this understanding of the passage correctly, so I'd love to hear more about whether there was a misread of the answer choice or if I'm misunderstanding your description of the passage above!

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
User avatar
DrMock
Joined: 08 Nov 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
20
 [2]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
GPA: 8.6
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
Posts: 58
Kudos: 20
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WhitEngagePrep Thanks for your response, you're spot on. I misunderstood the option choice, and you pointing it out made it obvious. I misunderstood it as the author presenting this in support of the contention which was against technology being a driver of these factors - so A and E really seemed the same to me except E seemed more extreme.
Quote:
DrMock
On Q3, I picked option E (and just as I clicked on to the next question, it hit me that it was too extreme). Couldn't go back and change it. Nevertheless, it was between A and E, and my initial thought was that the author mentions their position against technology being a driver in S1 - doesn't that translate to "most important factor" or given that no extreme markers are present that's not true?
Just wanted to double check your logic for E. You said that "didn't the author mention their position against technology being a driver..." - and you're right. The author is actually making a statement that technology is NOT necessarily a driver of change when they combine the language that it is "sometimes described" that way YET it "has no momentum of its own." The rest of the paragraph and then the second paragraph are all building on that idea. In fact, Melman's study "illustrates this point." So what is the WHY behind including Melman's study (questions that ask "in order to" are asking about the why)? Well it must be to show that it isn't just technology, but lots of things that could be impacting production methods.

(E) support the contention that technology IS the most important factor in decisions concerning production methods
Capitalization and red font are MY emphasis, but this choice says that the author is including Melman to support the idea (contention) that technology IS THE most important, but we just saw that the passage says the opposite - that is might be just one of many if its a driver at all. Eliminate (and not because it is extreme, but because it is the opposite of what the passage says).

Your question seems to present this understanding of the passage correctly, so I'd love to hear more about whether there was a misread of the answer choice or if I'm misunderstanding your description of the passage above!

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts