Hi vrinda6,Great question, and you're right that
without the ordering, the negatives could sit anywhere. The key is that Bunuel's cases use the one extra fact you might be skipping past:
m < p < r < t < z. That ordering locks
which numbers can be negative.
Here's the logic. Negatives are always the numbers on the far
left of an ordered list, because they're the smallest. If any variable is negative, then every variable smaller than it must also be negative.
Walk through it:
- If
p is negative, then
m (which is smaller) must be negative too. So you can never have "m positive, p negative" - the order forbids it.
- If
r is negative, then
m,
p, and
r are all negative - you can't skip over m and p.
Therefore the negatives can only "fill in from the left." With an
even count of them (
0,
2, or
4), the only allowed pictures are:
-
0 negatives:
+ + + + +-
2 negatives:
- - + + + (must be m, p)
-
4 negatives:
- - - - + (must be m, p, r, t)
You can't have, say, m and r negative but p positive - that would need p to be larger than a positive number yet smaller than a negative one, which breaks the order.
Why this settles the "must be true" part: since m and p share the same sign in
every case,
mp is always positive. Same for
rt. But
tz flips negative in the
4-negative case, so it fails. That's C.
Quick check to lock it in: take the ordered set
{a < b < c} with product positive. Which spots can the
two negatives occupy? Only
a and
b - never a and c. Try to place them anywhere else and the ordering breaks. Same rule, smaller set.
Answer: Cvrinda6
Bunuel but why are we assuming that the first two values could be negative or the last three could be positive?
Since all are in multiplication, any of the (even numbered ie 2 or 4) could be negative. And since this is a must be true question- we need to know for certain?