Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
15 Dec 2025, 09:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
48% (02:01) correct
52%
(02:27)
wrong
based on 346
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Materials scientist: “Ripple bands” are patterned surface formations consisting of a raised ring of coarse grains surrounding a center of finer grains. They are found mainly on high-altitude desert flats. In attempts to explain how they were formed, two hypotheses are currently most commonly debated: one proposes wind abrasion, the other proposes chemical crystallization. But wind abrasion cannot be the complete explanation for the uniformity in width of the ripple bands on the Atira Plateau, located in a region with highly variable wind patterns. Therefore, chemical crystallization, either from saline groundwater or surface deposits, was likely involved in the formation of the bands.
Which of the following would, if true, most weaken the scientist’s argument?
A. Field measurements show that wind abrasion is currently occurring at many ripple-band sites on the Atira Plateau.
B. The two hypotheses do not exhaust the possibilities regarding formation processes for ripple bands.
C. The definition given for ripple bands excludes many surface features that may be caused by wind abrasion or chemical crystallization.
D. The ripple bands on the Atira Plateau were probably not all formed at the same time.
E. Neither of the two hypotheses explains how coarse and fine grains came to be on the Atira Plateau in the first place.
Which of the following would, if true, most weaken the scientist’s argument?
A. Field measurements show that wind abrasion is currently occurring at many ripple-band sites on the Atira Plateau.
B. The two hypotheses do not exhaust the possibilities regarding formation processes for ripple bands.
C. The definition given for ripple bands excludes many surface features that may be caused by wind abrasion or chemical crystallization.
D. The ripple bands on the Atira Plateau were probably not all formed at the same time.
E. Neither of the two hypotheses explains how coarse and fine grains came to be on the Atira Plateau in the first place.
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
15 Dec 2025, 09:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
The correct answer is (B).
Here is the straightforward logic:
The scientist is acting like a bad detective. They have set up a world where there are only two suspects: Suspect A (Wind) and Suspect B (Chemicals).
They look at the evidence and say, "Well, the evidence doesn't fit Suspect A (Wind). The wind is messy, but these lines are neat."
So they conclude, "Therefore, it must be Suspect B (Chemicals)!"
The flaw: What if there is a Suspect C? Or D?
What if the ripple bands were formed by water erosion? Or magnetic fields? Or seismic vibrations?
If there are other possibilities that the scientist didn't even bother to list, then proving "It wasn't wind" proves absolutely nothing about chemicals. It just proves "It wasn't wind."
That is exactly what Option (B) points out:
"The two hypotheses do not exhaust the possibilities..."
It’s basically saying: "Hey, you forgot to check if it was water or gravity."
Why the others miss the mark:
(A) says wind is happening now. That doesn't matter. The scientist already said wind creates the wrong shape. Even if the wind is blowing today, if it makes messy shapes and the bands are neat, the scientist is still right to doubt the wind.
(C)This argues about semantics. We are interested in explaining the actual ripple bands on the Atira Plateau, not the ones excluded by the definition.
(D) says they were formed at different times. This is a weak argument. Even if they were formed years apart, it doesn't explain how they were formed.
(E) talks about where the sand came from. The argument is about how the sand was arranged. Those are two different problems.
Here is the straightforward logic:
The scientist is acting like a bad detective. They have set up a world where there are only two suspects: Suspect A (Wind) and Suspect B (Chemicals).
They look at the evidence and say, "Well, the evidence doesn't fit Suspect A (Wind). The wind is messy, but these lines are neat."
So they conclude, "Therefore, it must be Suspect B (Chemicals)!"
The flaw: What if there is a Suspect C? Or D?
What if the ripple bands were formed by water erosion? Or magnetic fields? Or seismic vibrations?
If there are other possibilities that the scientist didn't even bother to list, then proving "It wasn't wind" proves absolutely nothing about chemicals. It just proves "It wasn't wind."
That is exactly what Option (B) points out:
"The two hypotheses do not exhaust the possibilities..."
It’s basically saying: "Hey, you forgot to check if it was water or gravity."
Why the others miss the mark:
(A) says wind is happening now. That doesn't matter. The scientist already said wind creates the wrong shape. Even if the wind is blowing today, if it makes messy shapes and the bands are neat, the scientist is still right to doubt the wind.
(C)This argues about semantics. We are interested in explaining the actual ripple bands on the Atira Plateau, not the ones excluded by the definition.
(D) says they were formed at different times. This is a weak argument. Even if they were formed years apart, it doesn't explain how they were formed.
(E) talks about where the sand came from. The argument is about how the sand was arranged. Those are two different problems.
Bunuel
15 Dec 2025, 09:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
conclusion - Chemical crystallization, either from saline groundwater or surface deposits, was likely involved in the formation of the bands
Line of reasoning - Wind abrasion cannot be the complete explanation for the uniformity in width of the ripple band on the Atira Plateau
Since this is a weaking question, we must give a reason for the conclusion to not hold true
Option A - this talks about how wind abrasion is currently occurring at many ripple band sites - but so what? how is this affecting our conclusion - cross A
Option B - this says there are other possibilities regarding the formation - hold on B
Option C - may be caused by wind abrasion or chemical crystallization? talks about both wind abrasion & chemical crystallization, and doesn't support either one - cross C
Option D - this talks about when the ripple bands have formed. We are looking for a HOW and not a WHEN - cross D
Option E - how coarse and fine grains came? we don't care about how these grains came - we are talking about the ripple bands in their entirety
First time writing an explanation, bear with me if I sound juvenile, please
Thanks,
Swetha
Line of reasoning - Wind abrasion cannot be the complete explanation for the uniformity in width of the ripple band on the Atira Plateau
Since this is a weaking question, we must give a reason for the conclusion to not hold true
Option A - this talks about how wind abrasion is currently occurring at many ripple band sites - but so what? how is this affecting our conclusion - cross A
Option B - this says there are other possibilities regarding the formation - hold on B
Option C - may be caused by wind abrasion or chemical crystallization? talks about both wind abrasion & chemical crystallization, and doesn't support either one - cross C
Option D - this talks about when the ripple bands have formed. We are looking for a HOW and not a WHEN - cross D
Option E - how coarse and fine grains came? we don't care about how these grains came - we are talking about the ripple bands in their entirety
First time writing an explanation, bear with me if I sound juvenile, please
Thanks,
Swetha
Bunuel
