Bunuel
Deconstructing the Question Total candies = 82.
Cherry (\(C\)) = 29.
Let Mango = \(M\) and Lime = \(L\).
Equation: \(29 + M + L = 82 \implies M + L = 53\).
Target: Find the value of \(M\).
Analyze Statement (1) "The minimum number of candies Rita must pick... to ensure getting at least one candy of each flavor is 69."
Theory: Worst-Case Scenario To guarantee 1 of each flavor, you must exhaust the two largest categories first.
The next pick (the first of the smallest category) completes the set.
Formula:
\(Total - Smallest\_Category + 1 = \text{Guaranteed Number}\)
\(82 - Smallest + 1 = 69\)
\(83 - Smallest = 69\)
\(Smallest = 14\)
So, the count of the least frequent candy is 14.
Since \(C = 29\), \(C\) is not the smallest.
Thus, either \(M = 14\) or \(L = 14\).
Case 1: If \(M = 14\), then \(L = 53 - 14 = 39\).
Case 2: If \(L = 14\), then \(M = 53 - 14 = 39\).
We have two possible values for \(M\) (14 or 39).
INSUFFICIENT Analyze Statement (2) "There are fewer lime candies than mango candies."
Inequality: \(L < M\). Combined with \(M + L = 53\), this implies \(M > 26.5\).
\(M\) could be 27, 28, 30, etc.
INSUFFICIENT Combine Statements (1) and (2) From (1), the possible pairs for \((M, L)\) are \((14, 39)\) or \((39, 14)\).
From (2), we must have \(L < M\).
Check the pairs:
1. \(M = 14, L = 39 \implies 39 < 14\)
(False) 2. \(M = 39, L = 14 \implies 14 < 39\)
(True) Only one case is valid: \(M = 39\).
SUFFICIENT Answer: C