This was quite an interesting and fun problem. So according to the given facts, and data sets this is what can be ascertained.
I am simplifying each of their names as A,B,C,D,E and F respectively. We have the following information:
B>D
D> 3 siblings - say x,y,z for now.
E -> Not a sibling.
From this we can infer that E & D are not siblings since there are exactly 3 siblings. E is ruled out from the data set. And D > all 3 siblings so D also cannot be a sibling. And B > D which means B > x,y,z or all 3 siblings as well.
So we have:
Not Siblings - B, D, E
Siblings - A, C, F
Now the progression of ages:
B>D > A,C,F [Unclear who is older amongst the three]
Next with 'E' it is quite interesting. E can be the youngest, oldest or can slot in after B, D, A, C, F. E is the one that could fit anywhere and amongst all the 3 groups. Since though D > A,C,F it is nowhere given that E >= or <= A,C,F. So E could very well be A>E or C>E or F>E.
So how I have written it is as follows:
(E) > B > (E) > D > (E) > A (E), C (E), F (E) > (E)
Basically to highlight above that E could potentially slot in anywhere.
So far as question 1 - which could come in Group 2 but not in Group 3.
If we calculate the one that is constant to come in Group 2, it is A. Because wherever 'E' lands, A is always either No. 3 or No. 4 in the age denomination. Hence the answer to Question 1 is A.
So far as question 2, it is evident that E could end up at Group 1 as the oldest or second oldest or third, fourth, fifth or sixth. So E is answer to Question 2.
Other PS problems were challenging but this was fun!