Answer should be
E. Here is how:
All of the furniture for sale at Al’s Discount Furniture is offered for less than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). Once a year, Al’s holds a clearance sale. If Jamie purchased a certain desk during the sale, did she get a discount of more than 50% of Al’s regular price for the desk?
Statement A: Al’s regular price for the desk is \(60%\) , rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of \($2000\).
\(60%\) could be \(59.5%\) or \(60.4%\). We also know that MSRP \(=$2000\)
So there could be \(2\) possible values for the Sale Price. Let \(x\) be the regular price.
\(x=\frac{{59.5}}{100}*2000=1190\)
or
\(x=\frac{{60.4}}{100}*2000=1208\)
We now need the price that Jamie bought it for and Statement A does not provide it... So Insufficient
Statement 2: The sale price was $601 less than Al’s regular price for the desk.
We do not know the regular price so the statement is clearly insufficient.
Statement 1 & 2 Combined:
We know the two possibilities of the Regular price, \(1190\) & \(1208\)
If Jamie bought it for \(1190\) , then YES she did buy it at a discount greater than \(50%\) for obvious reasons.
If Jamie bought it for \(1208\) , then NO she did not buy it at a discount greater than \(50%\) for obvious reasons.
2 different answers even with the statements combined. Hence
E