Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 18:17 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 18:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
chineseburned
Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Last visit: 28 Apr 2010
Posts: 309
Own Kudos:
7,342
 [40]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: UCSD ($) , UCLA, USC ($), Stanford
Posts: 309
Kudos: 7,342
 [40]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
omerrauf
Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Last visit: 04 May 2012
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
461
 [17]
Given Kudos: 10
Status:Employed
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.2
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 66
Kudos: 461
 [17]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
pmenon
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 692
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 692
Kudos: 614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sreehari
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Last visit: 29 Jun 2013
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
194
 [1]
Schools:Chicago Booth
Posts: 88
Kudos: 194
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yup.. looks like the catch is rounding - it could be anynumber between 59.5 to 60.4

what is OA? and what is the soucre?
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 961
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer C.

Statement 1) This tells us what the price is that Al charges without the sale, but doesn't give any information as the the size of the discount for the clearance sale. Insufficient.

Statement 2) This tells us the size of the discount, but we still don't know the original price Al charges for the item. Insufficient.

Together, we know what Al charged originally as his "regular price" and we know the size of the discount. The price originally is 60% of $2,000, so that's $1,200. If the sale price is $601 less than the normal Al's price, that's greater than 50% of Al's price. This is sufficient.

nirimblf
All of the furniture for sale at Al’s Discount Furniture is offered for less than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). Once a year, Al’s holds a clearance sale. If Jamie purchased a certain desk during the sale, did she get a discount of more than 50% of Al’s regular price for the desk?

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.

(2) The sale price was $601 less than Al’s regular price for the desk.
User avatar
nirimblf
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nope. That's what I thought. But it's a nasty trick question. Read statement 1 carefully.

jallenmorris
Answer C.

Statement 1) This tells us what the price is that Al charges without the sale, but doesn't give any information as the the size of the discount for the clearance sale. Insufficient.

Statement 2) This tells us the size of the discount, but we still don't know the original price Al charges for the item. Insufficient.

Together, we know what Al charged originally as his "regular price" and we know the size of the discount. The price originally is 60% of $2,000, so that's $1,200. If the sale price is $601 less than the normal Al's price, that's greater than 50% of Al's price. This is sufficient.

nirimblf
All of the furniture for sale at Al’s Discount Furniture is offered for less than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). Once a year, Al’s holds a clearance sale. If Jamie purchased a certain desk during the sale, did she get a discount of more than 50% of Al’s regular price for the desk?

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.

(2) The sale price was $601 less than Al’s regular price for the desk.
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
961
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 961
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok....I am reading it carefully:

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.

This tells us what Al's regular price for the desk is. It doesn't tell us anything about what she bought it for.

I think I know what the trick is. We're told it's rounded to the nearst percent...which means Al's price could be 60.4999999999999999999%. This would mean that his price is anything less than 60.5% of the MSRP. 60.5% is $1210 so $12,09.99 is the most he can charge for the desk.

Answer must be E then because even knowing the dollar amount of the discount means that $1209.99 - $601 is not a 50% dsicount, but because it's rounded, the % could also be 59.5%, which would mean $601 is greater than a 50% discount.

Is this the trick?
avatar
RayOfLight
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Last visit: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jallenmorris
Ok....I am reading it carefully:

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.

This tells us what Al's regular price for the desk is. It doesn't tell us anything about what she bought it for.

I think I know what the trick is. We're told it's rounded to the nearst percent...which means Al's price could be 60.4999999999999999999%. This would mean that his price is anything less than 60.5% of the MSRP. 60.5% is $1210 so $12,09.99 is the most he can charge for the desk.

Answer must be E then because even knowing the dollar amount of the discount means that $1209.99 - $601 is not a 50% dsicount, but because it's rounded, the % could also be 59.5%, which would mean $601 is greater than a 50% discount.

Is this the trick?

Good one Jallen! the discount could be anything n between 59.5% to 60.4999999... %
If we use these extremes to calculate the total discount would be
below 50% in case we use 59.5 %
above 50% in case we use 60.4999999... %.

thus both statements are insufficient.
User avatar
judokan
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Last visit: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
238
 [4]
Posts: 203
Kudos: 238
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nirimblf
All of the furniture for sale at Al’s Discount Furniture is offered for less than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). Once a year, Al’s holds a clearance sale. If Jamie purchased a certain desk during the sale, did she get a discount of more than 50% of Al’s regular price for the desk?

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.

(2) The sale price was $601 less than Al’s regular price for the desk.

Let X be the MSRP, Y be the Regular Price in Al's, and Z be the discounted prive in Al's

Given X > Y > Z
Task: find out if Z < 0.5 * Y

(1) alone is NOT sufficient. Because it only tells:
Y = (0.595 to 0.604) * X
X = 2000
So, Y = 1190 to 1208
Without any infomation about Z, we cannot conclude Z < 0.5 * Y

(2) alone is NOT sufficient. It only tells:
Z = Y - 601

(1) & (2) together is NOT sufficient
When Y = 1190, Z = 589
Z / Y = 589/1190 < 50%
When Y = 1208, Z = 607
Z / Y = 607/1208 > 50%

So Ans is E
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 961
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You all seem so smart coming in after I throw myself under the bus with the wrong answer at first ;-) Just kidding. It's a good question to use to remind us that every single word/phrase means something in these questions and we can't ignore them.

Good question!
User avatar
nirimblf
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jallenmorris
You all seem so smart coming in after I throw myself under the bus with the wrong answer at first ;-) Just kidding. It's a good question to use to remind us that every single word/phrase means something in these questions and we can't ignore them.

Good question!

Thanks. 8-) Under a time pressure, who cares about the implications of "rounded to the nearest percent"... I know I didn't..
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 961
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
just remember that MGMAT questions are harder than the real questions on the GMAT. I'm not sure how it really helps us to get caught by this question. It's really about reading and interpreting the words of the question. I've found GMAT problems to be more straight forward and not tricky like this one.

Allen

nirimblf
jallenmorris
You all seem so smart coming in after I throw myself under the bus with the wrong answer at first ;-) Just kidding. It's a good question to use to remind us that every single word/phrase means something in these questions and we can't ignore them.

Good question!

Thanks. 8-) Under a time pressure, who cares about the implications of "rounded to the nearest percent"... I know I didn't..
User avatar
calreg11
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Last visit: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE:Account Management (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
both statements are insufficient however since $600 is more than "less than 1200" we know that Jamie paid less that 50%
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,126
Kudos: 1,249
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chineseburned
All of the furniture for sale at Al’s Discount Furniture is offered for less than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). Once a year, Al’s holds a clearance sale. If Jamie purchased a certain desk during the sale, did she get a discount of more than 50% of Al’s regular price for the desk?

(1) Al’s regular price for the desk is 60%, rounded to the nearest percent, of the MSRP of $2000.
(2) The sale price was $601 less than Al’s regular price for the desk.

I see where the trick is!!!
(1) - regular price, rounded TO THE NEAREST PERCENT is 60% of 2000, or 1200+. - alone is not sufficient.
(2) sale price is 601 less than regular price - alone is not sufficient.

1+2
if 60% -> then yes, he got more than 50% discount of the regular price
but what if the price is 1202? in this case, he did not buy at more than 50% discount.

suppose 1202 is regular price.
that is 1202/2000 or 601/1000 or 60.1%. 60.1 rounded to the nearest percent is 60%.
so E it is.
avatar
Aashav27
Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Last visit: 13 Oct 2022
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 41
Products:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OG Solution

In order to determine the percent discount received by Jamie, we need to know two things: the regular price of the desk and the sale price of the desk. Alternatively, we could calculate the percent discount from the price reduction and either the regular price or the sale price.

(1) INSUFFICIENT: This statement tells us the range ($0 to $1,199.99) of the regular price of the desk at Al’s, but provides no information about how much Jamie actually paid for the desk during the annual sale.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: This statement tells us how much the price of the desk was reduced during the sale, but provides no information about the regular price. For example, if the regular price was $6,000, then the discount was only 10%. On the other hand, if the regular price was $601, then the discount was nearly 100%.

(1) AND (2) SUFFICIENT: Combined, we know that Al's regular price of the desk is less than $1,200, and that the size of the discount is $600. The question is whether that discount is greater than 50%:

Is ($600)/(Less than $1,200) > 50%?

For any positive number less than $1,200, the answer is yes.

The correct answer is C.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,398
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,398
Kudos: 1,013
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
102570 posts