dulsban
Hi Everyone,
Does it occur to anyone that this year, especially in R2, the trend is to choose younger aspirants over the more experienced folks? I am seeing this trend in Fuqua invites as well as in Ross invites.
I worked real hard on my essays...and didn't get an interview from either Fuqua or Ross. I'm stunned to say the least. I'm an international applicant and here's my profile:
GMAT: 720, 6.0 (first and only attempt, this year)
GPA: 3.8 (Computer Science and Engineering)
WE: 8 yrs on matriculation (4 yrs of international experience at Fortune 500 client locations), IT consulting, IT strategy and Project Management with Fortune 1000 MNC
Career Progression: Consistent
EC: Decent - was regular member of University Sports Team; co-founded a non-profit organization for children, committee member of Corporate Social Welfare group.
Referee: 1) Client Manager at Fortune 500 client organization, 2) Direct Supervisor
Target Concentration - Business Strategy Consulting.
I'm looking for holes (must be big ones in there) in my profile to justify the dings.
Do you think years of experience actually went against me? I am eager to know your opinion.Thanks
AG
Allow me to disagree with you. I am 33 y.o. (intl.) and was invited to interview by Ross and by Duke. And I don't have your GMAT. A solid score, but not stellar at all.
Of course, I cannot predict the final results, but I prefer to think the invitations mean something.
I think that one of the most important things to these schools is the level of your passion to be admitted there. They seem to have somewhat of an "inferiority complex" towards their more established peers, and don't like to feel like a "safety school" for strong applicants - which they often are, unfortunately (even though I think they'll give you the instruments and get you anywhere you want, just like H/W/S et al.).
I tried to convey my excitement through my essays, and I really do think that it's about time to break the pompous elitism of the M7 or whatever. To my opinion, the quality of education in UMich, for example, might be better than in Harvard etc.: they teach, hands-on (e.g. MAP) and not just serve as a family club for rich and famous. I prefer to be surrounded by self-made individuals and not by spoiled legacy kids, full of ... entitlement mentality.
To be honest, those kids in M7 will succeed with or without an MBA. That's the whole point behind the tendency of making the classes younger: take a bright inexperienced youngster, label him an "MBA alumnus" - and voila! You got a dedicated follower for life, never mind an actual contribution of the education for his progress in life.
I have a feeling that Ross and Duke do prefer to admit a non-trivial number of more mature, "life-beaten" candidates - in order to let them balance other, often "over-playful" and emotionally- (and prestige-) driven younger students. I've tried - via my essays - to convey the feeling (but not to tell that expressly, of course) that I might be somewhat "more serious" than some of my future classmates, and could even, G-d forbid, teach them a thing or two about life that is not built only from rat-race competitions, tests, interviews, rankings or 10K more or less in bonuses.
I've experienced a family tragedy that changed my focus to real things in life - especially healthcare (I'd better become a medical researcher, but FOR THAT I am indeed too old) - and was not shy to talk about it in my application (matter-of-factly, as I don't need anyone to pity me).
To sum up: I hope I am not wrong on this, and the schools do not discriminate candidates based on their age (with notable snobbish (and potentially disastrous for their own business model: what's the point of getting an MBA straight after the BA in Business Administration or Economics?! Why spend 5 years of your life, basically, in the same classroom?!) exceptions of HBS and Stanford.
Our age is our strength, and we need to leverage this fact.
The world is moving. People are changing careers, countries - and themselves - more and more. We'll be fine.