Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 22:36 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 22:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Atsushi
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Last visit: 01 Nov 2011
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
GPA: 3.95
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
Posts: 40
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
chinobaeza
Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Last visit: 10 Apr 2024
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 50
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pjj229
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Last visit: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
olymbios
Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 2
Schools:McDonough (R2-Accepted), York-Schulich (R1- Accepted), Booth (R2 -WL), Yale (R2 - Ding w/o int), Fuqua (R2- Accepted), Cornell-Johnson(R3-Ding w/int), USC-Marshall (R2 - Accepted)
GPA: 3.3
WE 1: Finance (Int'l) 4 yrs
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Waitlisted as well. I've had a couple friends in the last two years be waitlisted and both got in with a little extra communication and documentation sent it. Hope it works out!
avatar
NikkiMBA
Joined: 12 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 123
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pjj229
In response to a few questions about managing the waitlist:

- I am not international, but have heard about internationals visiting the school while on the waitlist and getting in. If Booth is truely your top choice, it is probably not a bad idea to visit. When you visit you cannot normally schedule a meeting with an Admissions Director, but when you get to campus you can normally request to have a few minutes to talk to a Director. Of course, you have to consider that you might visit campus and not get in, so then you might be wasting quite a bit of $$ to visit.
- I sent materials in about 6 weeks or so. The "right" timing for follow-ups will probably vary by person. I tried to follow-up when I had new substantial info to add to my application.
- I had an alum write a letter for me - but only because I knew the alum pretty well. Lots of current students have told me it is a bad idea to find a random alum that won't be able to say much about you.

Overall, I think the main thing is to show you are interested, try to identify your application weaknesses (and address them if nessesary), let them know of any changes to your application, and hope for the best. Good luck to all you WL'ers!


Thanks so much Pjj229- Really appreciate your help. For me I have a feeling that it was my interview that has led to the result. I really couldn't gauge my interviewer. They were a poker face throughout the interview. In this instance, I feel it makes it all the more necessary that I can demonstrate confidently my interest, passion and how I can contribute to Booth by being able to meet with the adcom. Since I am Chicago, this is more feasible for me. Is this going to be difficult to set something up? I am so devastated by this result, and its just taking a lot of time for me to overcome this. Any suggestions from yourself or others on the board will be helpful. Thanks a ton! All other waitlisters out there, my heart goes out to all of you.
avatar
valleyboy
Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Last visit: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Did anyone try calling up the admissions office to express their interest to continue to be waitlisted ? Is it advisable to give them a quick call ? Will they actually open up your file and give you some feedback ?
User avatar
w103psp
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Last visit: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 302
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
valleyboy
Did anyone try calling up the admissions office to express their interest to continue to be waitlisted ? Is it advisable to give them a quick call ? Will they actually open up your file and give you some feedback ?

No, don't call. Their email specifically lists out the steps one can take and calling is not one of them.
User avatar
theacademist
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Last visit: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2013
GPA: 3.6
WE 1: US Military
Posts: 69
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Personally, I think Booth is using the waitlist this year in an effort to improve the two biggest arguments people constantly have against Booth's title as number 1 b-school - It's 22% acceptance rate and its comparatively low yield.

In this economy, there's no shortage of high GMAT and GPA applicants... but selectivity is prestige in a can. Make em wait, let the less committed leave, and then accept the best of what's left....which judging by the size of the waitlist is alot. Voila! High-selectivity and yield.

Booth is trying to preserve their US News #1 ranking. Until the rankers start accounting for waitlist manipulation, I think this may become the new-normal for some schools.
User avatar
dalillama
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 25 Dec 2016
Posts: 156
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q41 V46
GMAT 2: 740 Q47 V45
GPA: 3
GMAT 2: 740 Q47 V45
Posts: 156
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
theacademist

Booth is trying to preserve their BusinessWeek #1 ranking.

FTFY

Except that in the BusinessWeek ranking selectivity and yield are not factored in--it's strictly a satisfaction survey (both student and recruiter) with an "intellectual capital" componenent (into which the GMAT average does not factor).

My opinion, having seen the admit numbers, is that we have a sample bias here. The admit numbers seem geared towards a yield of about 65%. If your yield is higher than anticipated, your waitlist would be smaller than normal, not larger. The same sample bias could be happening with the Wharton WL which everyone thinks was also larger than normal. Unfortunately I have no insights into that one.
User avatar
theacademist
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Last visit: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2013
GPA: 3.6
WE 1: US Military
Posts: 69
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the correction, for some reason I thought it was US news, but you are correct.

I still think they are using the WL to manipulate selectivity and yield.
User avatar
mreevit
Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Last visit: 24 Sep 2015
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
WE:Other (Insurance)
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
Posts: 261
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dalillama
theacademist

Booth is trying to preserve their BusinessWeek #1 ranking.

FTFY

Except that in the BusinessWeek ranking selectivity and yield are not factored in--it's strictly a satisfaction survey (both student and recruiter) with an "intellectual capital" componenent (into which the GMAT average does not factor).

My opinion, having seen the admit numbers, is that we have a sample bias here. The admit numbers seem geared towards a yield of about 65%. If your yield is higher than anticipated, your waitlist would be smaller than normal, not larger. The same sample bias could be happening with the Wharton WL which everyone thinks was also larger than normal. Unfortunately I have no insights into that one.


The assumption you are making here is that the high yield will stay through to the end of this year's cycle. If Booth is excepting many candidates to withdraw from the school in favor of another school, it makes sense for them to have a decent sized waitlist.

I am hearing that Booth moved it's deposit deadline up - much earlier than peer schools. Thus, those admitted are much likelier to hedge their bets by putting a deposit down and waiting to see what the other schools say.

I've said it before, and I will say it again: I don't think a school's yield can jump 15% is just one calendar year. I think it will level out as we progress through the rounds.

As for whether or not they are using the wait list to manipulate selectivity, I think that this is unlikely. Acceptance rate accounts for only 1.25% of the US News score. If they got a perfect selectivity score, and if all of the other factors stayed the same, then the most they could increase to is 93.25, which is close to Wharton. However, that assumes their current score is the opposite end of the spectrum when it is closer to the middle (they are already getting some credit for selectivity).

So, if they managed to manipulate their selectivity to be around that of Stanford, they would move from getting 50% of the 1.25% to 100% of the 1.25%, and they could only move up to about 92.625, which isn't enough to put them ahead of Wharton. They could, at best, tie them.
User avatar
theacademist
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Last visit: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2013
GPA: 3.6
WE 1: US Military
Posts: 69
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 -- good analysis
avatar
jerrykid
Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
Posts: 136
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NikkiMBA
Thanks so much Pjj229- Really appreciate your help. For me I have a feeling that it was my interview that has led to the result. I really couldn't gauge my interviewer. They were a poker face throughout the interview.
In this instance, I feel it makes it all the more necessary that I can demonstrate confidently my interest, passion and how I can contribute to Booth by being able to meet with the adcom. Since I am Chicago, this is more feasible for me. Is this going to be difficult to set something up?

I am so devastated by this result, and its just taking a lot of time for me to overcome this. Any suggestions from yourself or others on the board will be helpful. Thanks a ton! All other waitlisters out there, my heart goes out to all of you.

I slept for one whole day. When I woke up, the feeling of devastation was gone and I felt refreshing to start working to go up the waitlist. In the end, there's no point in lamenting. We have gone this far and being in the waitlist means that we are among the top 20- 30% of applicants to Booth and still stand a chance of getting admissions.

Of course the timing varies among those waitlisted. But I think that as the deadline for Round 3 is April, 13th and the final decision comes out on May, 18th, we should wrap updates up within the last 2 weeks of April. That timing leaves room for us to make improvements and for the Admission Committee to consider us against Round 3 applicants.

I think that paying school visits is a good idea. Getting reference letters as well. Improvements in the workplace, extra-curriculum activities etc. Try our best to differentiate ourselves, prove our interest and "fit", I think.

I see people get letters from alumni. Do you think that it is a good idea getting reference letters from current students is a good idea?
avatar
pkatmi
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 77
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pjj229
In response to a few questions about managing the waitlist:

- I am not international, but have heard about internationals visiting the school while on the waitlist and getting in. If Booth is truely your top choice, it is probably not a bad idea to visit. When you visit you cannot normally schedule a meeting with an Admissions Director, but when you get to campus you can normally request to have a few minutes to talk to a Director. Of course, you have to consider that you might visit campus and not get in, so then you might be wasting quite a bit of $$ to visit.
- I sent materials in about 6 weeks or so. The "right" timing for follow-ups will probably vary by person. I tried to follow-up when I had new substantial info to add to my application.
- I had an alum write a letter for me - but only because I knew the alum pretty well. Lots of current students have told me it is a bad idea to find a random alum that won't be able to say much about you.

Overall, I think the main thing is to show you are interested, try to identify your application weaknesses (and address them if nessesary), let them know of any changes to your application, and hope for the best. Good luck to all you WL'ers!

Thanks pjj229. This is immensely helpful.
One question though - When submitting additional recommendations, should one have the recommenders mail the recos directly to adcom or should I get a signed reco and scan it and send it along myself? Also, should the recos be sent to the generic admissions address or to the director of admissions?
avatar
pkatmi
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 77
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Has any of the WL candidates used or thought about using Admission Consultancy. Pros and Cons?

Any ideas on good ones out there?
avatar
motion
Joined: 20 Mar 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Schools:Chicago Booth 2013
WE 1: Consulting (3 years)
Posts: 20
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey all. Long time lurker, first time poster. Wanted to add one more data point. I was an R1 waitlist who got admitted R2! Very, very thrilled.

Stats: 3.7 Ivy, 760. 3 years in consulting (at matriculation) with strong career progression. Strong EC leadership during and after college, in politics and community service.

In terms of waitlist follow up, I just sent two updates, one in January and one in February. Both were short, three paragraph notes. I used them to concisely reiterate my interest, update them on my latest career developments, and explain one or two things in my application, all through the lens of what unique contribution I could make to the class.

I've been reticent to post up until now, but I found a great deal of comfort and guidance in these forums over the last six months, so I'm eager to give back. Congrats to the admits - can't wait to see you all in Chicago. Good luck to all the waitlists - I'm living proof there's still hope. Everyone else, keep fighting - the universe will eventually reward you for your determination, it may just take a little more time to see how.
avatar
jerrykid
Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
Posts: 136
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pkatmi

One question though - When submitting additional recommendations, should one have the recommenders mail the recos directly to adcom or should I get a signed reco and scan it and send it along myself? Also, should the recos be sent to the generic admissions address or to the director of admissions?

I think that the better idea would be to get a signed recommendation letter and scan it and send it along yourself. That would be easier for adcom to follow up your updates.

Maybe we should send updates to the general email address and make calls to check whether they put updates into our files. I don't think that the Admission Director would do the manual work of classifying our updates into our files.

My 2 cents.
avatar
MBAgirl2010
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Last visit: 26 May 2013
Posts: 446
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 446
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jerrykid
pkatmi

One question though - When submitting additional recommendations, should one have the recommenders mail the recos directly to adcom or should I get a signed reco and scan it and send it along myself? Also, should the recos be sent to the generic admissions address or to the director of admissions?

I think that the better idea would be to get a signed recommendation letter and scan it and send it along yourself. That would be easier for adcom to follow up your updates.

Maybe we should send updates to the general email address and make calls to check whether they put updates into our files. I don't think that the Admission Director would do the manual work of classifying our updates into our files.

My 2 cents.

Ask the recommenders to send the letters straight to the main admissions e-mail. If you send them, the credibility for these letters of support is shot. As long as they mention your correct name, the letters should get to your file. Call admissions a couple of days after to confirm they got the letters.
avatar
pkatmi
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 77
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBAgirl2010

Ask the recommenders to send the letters straight to the main admissions e-mail. If you send them, the credibility for these letters of support is shot. As long as they mention your correct name, the letters should get to your file. Call admissions a couple of days after to confirm they got the letters.

I would tend to agree with MBAgirl2010 on that. Sending the recos yourself could undermine their credibility even if they are signed and scanned. It would be better if the recos went out from the recommender's official email addresses.
avatar
pkatmi
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 77
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Looks a like a lot of the other schools have created separate threads for WL candidates but I couldn't find one for Booth. Is there?
   1  ...  163   164   165   166   167  ...  185   
Moderator:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts