Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Here's the mistake that kills your score on hard TPA questions:
You read that "some locations have X" or "many cases show Y." Your brain tags these as important features. Later, when asked what must be true, you pick them—and get it wrong.
Why? Because "some" and "many" mean it's optional, not required. Only universal statements—ones without qualifiers—can be correct answers.
This one confusion costs students dearly. It's why 56% miss these questions. Why accuracy drops to 40%. Why each question takes 4+ minutes as you second-guess yourself.
The good news? Students who master this distinction hit 67% accuracy in just 2 minutes per question. No guessing. No panic. Just systematic confidence.
Free live session on November 11, 2025
Time: 9:00 PM IST (10:30 AM EST / 7:30 AM PST)
Duration: 90 minutes
We'll cover the complete "Own the Dataset" framework, including:
• How to systematically spot necessary vs. optional traits
• The decision process that eliminates precision traps
• Real GMAT examples with detailed walkthroughs
• Time-saving techniques that maintain accuracy
→ Register Here
This article covers one precision trap. The session covers the full framework.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
When GMAT TPA asks you to determine what must happen versus what must not happen, you're facing one of the exam's most precise logical challenges. This question type tests your ability to separate defining characteristics from optional ones—a skill that determines whether you can make valid inferences or fall into carefully laid traps. The stakes are high: misidentifying a characteristic that applies to "some" instances as one that applies to "all" instances will consistently lead you to incorrect answers. Master this distinction, and you'll navigate these questions with confidence.
The Cognitive Trap: Confusing "Common" with "Required"
Here's the fundamental error test-takers make: they see something described in the passage and assume it's a defining feature. If a passage mentions that something happens frequently or in multiple instances, our brains naturally categorize it as essential. But frequency and necessity are entirely different concepts.
Consider this simple scenario:
Now, what must happen in a plaza, and what must not happen there?
Many test-takers would incorrectly claim that having a fountain "must happen" because the passage mentions it prominently. But notice the qualifier: "some plazas have fountains." This immediately disqualifies fountains as a defining feature—if only some plazas have them, then clearly a plaza can exist without one.
On a similar official GMAT question testing this exact distinction, over 56% of test-takers selected an answer that confused a contingent characteristic (something true for "some") with a necessary one (true for "all"). This isn't a minor mistake—it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how definitions work.
Why This Matters: The Logic of Definitions
A definition identifies characteristics that are:
When GMAT asks what "must happen," it's asking for necessary conditions. When it asks what "must not happen," it's asking for explicit exclusions.
The trap is that passages often include:
Your job is to filter out everything except what applies universally.
The MUST Framework: Making Universal and Specific Trait Distinctions
Use this four-step process to avoid confusing common with required:
1. Map All Claims
Identify every characteristic or activity the passage attributes to the location/concept. List them explicitly.
2. Universalize or Qualify
For each characteristic, determine its scope:
Key principle: Only unqualified, universal statements can satisfy "must happen."
3. Spot Explicit Exclusions
Look for language indicating something does NOT occur at the location:
Key principle: For "must not happen," you need clear evidence of exclusion, not just absence of mention.
4. Test Necessity
For each potential "must happen" answer, ask: "Could the location still be [the defined thing] without this characteristic?" If yes, it's not necessary. If no, it's a defining feature.
Applying the Framework: A Simple Example
Passage: "A rookery is a breeding area where seabirds nest in large colonies. The birds compete for prime nesting spots on the cliff faces. Some rookeries are used for multiple consecutive years. Scientists often observe the rookeries to study territorial behavior."
Let's apply the MUST Framework:
Step 1: Map All Claims
Step 2: Universalize or Qualify
Step 3: Spot Explicit Exclusions
No explicit exclusions mentioned in this example
Step 4: Test Necessity
Answer:
Practice Exercise 1: Simple Application
Passage: "A hibernaculum is a shelter where animals spend the winter in dormancy. Some hibernacula are used by the same animals year after year. Animals leave the hibernaculum in spring to hunt for food."
Question: What must happen in a hibernaculum, and what must NOT happen there?
Options:
Answer:
Analysis of wrong answers:
Practice Exercise 2: Complex Application
Passage: "An agora was a central public space in ancient Greek cities where citizens gathered for assemblies and commerce. While the agora served as the heart of political debate, with speakers addressing crowds from elevated platforms, certain religious ceremonies were conducted at temples located near, but outside, the agora itself. Many agorae featured colonnaded walkways called stoas, which provided shade. The agora's role as a meeting place for civic discourse made it essential to democratic governance."
Question: Based on this definition, which activities must happen in an agora, and which must NOT happen there?
Options:
Answer:
Must happen:
Must NOT happen:
Analysis of wrong answers:
Framework application:
Key Takeaways
The GMAT rewards precision. When a question asks what "must" happen, it's not asking what typically happens, what often happens, or what might happen. It's asking what happens in every single instance, without exception. Train yourself to see this distinction, and you'll transform these questions from puzzles into straightforward logical exercises.
Master the Hardest TPA Questions Live
The "some" vs. "all" distinction is critical—but it's just one piece of the puzzle. The hardest TPA questions require you to own the dataset systematically, the way 750+ scorers do.
SESSION 1: Master the Hardest TPA Questions using Owning the Dataset
📅 Date: Monday, November 11, 2025
⏰ Time: 9:00 PM IST (10:30 AM EST / 7:30 AM PST)
⏱️ Duration: 90 minutes
What You'll Learn:
Students targeting DI83+ (90th percentile) who understand TPA fundamentals but struggle with the hardest questions.
→ REGISTER FOR THE SESSION NOW
→]
You read that "some locations have X" or "many cases show Y." Your brain tags these as important features. Later, when asked what must be true, you pick them—and get it wrong.
Why? Because "some" and "many" mean it's optional, not required. Only universal statements—ones without qualifiers—can be correct answers.
This one confusion costs students dearly. It's why 56% miss these questions. Why accuracy drops to 40%. Why each question takes 4+ minutes as you second-guess yourself.
The good news? Students who master this distinction hit 67% accuracy in just 2 minutes per question. No guessing. No panic. Just systematic confidence.
Free live session on November 11, 2025
Time: 9:00 PM IST (10:30 AM EST / 7:30 AM PST)
Duration: 90 minutes
We'll cover the complete "Own the Dataset" framework, including:
• How to systematically spot necessary vs. optional traits
• The decision process that eliminates precision traps
• Real GMAT examples with detailed walkthroughs
• Time-saving techniques that maintain accuracy
→ Register Here
This article covers one precision trap. The session covers the full framework.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
When GMAT TPA asks you to determine what must happen versus what must not happen, you're facing one of the exam's most precise logical challenges. This question type tests your ability to separate defining characteristics from optional ones—a skill that determines whether you can make valid inferences or fall into carefully laid traps. The stakes are high: misidentifying a characteristic that applies to "some" instances as one that applies to "all" instances will consistently lead you to incorrect answers. Master this distinction, and you'll navigate these questions with confidence.
The Cognitive Trap: Confusing "Common" with "Required"
Here's the fundamental error test-takers make: they see something described in the passage and assume it's a defining feature. If a passage mentions that something happens frequently or in multiple instances, our brains naturally categorize it as essential. But frequency and necessity are entirely different concepts.
Consider this simple scenario:
Quote:
Now, what must happen in a plaza, and what must not happen there?
Many test-takers would incorrectly claim that having a fountain "must happen" because the passage mentions it prominently. But notice the qualifier: "some plazas have fountains." This immediately disqualifies fountains as a defining feature—if only some plazas have them, then clearly a plaza can exist without one.
- What actually must happen? "People gather" for festivals and markets—this is stated without qualification, making it universal to all plazas.
- What must not happen? Purchases happen "nearby" after people leave—meaning shopping transactions are explicitly excluded from the plaza itself.
On a similar official GMAT question testing this exact distinction, over 56% of test-takers selected an answer that confused a contingent characteristic (something true for "some") with a necessary one (true for "all"). This isn't a minor mistake—it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how definitions work.
Why This Matters: The Logic of Definitions
A definition identifies characteristics that are:
- Necessary: Must be present in ALL instances
- Sufficient: When present together, they fully identify the thing
When GMAT asks what "must happen," it's asking for necessary conditions. When it asks what "must not happen," it's asking for explicit exclusions.
The trap is that passages often include:
- Contingent facts ("some species return repeatedly")
- Common but optional features ("many locations have this characteristic")
- Specific examples that aren't universal requirements
Your job is to filter out everything except what applies universally.
The MUST Framework: Making Universal and Specific Trait Distinctions
Use this four-step process to avoid confusing common with required:
1. Map All Claims
Identify every characteristic or activity the passage attributes to the location/concept. List them explicitly.
2. Universalize or Qualify
For each characteristic, determine its scope:
- Does it apply to ALL instances? (Look for unqualified statements)
- Does it apply to SOME instances? (Look for qualifiers like "some," "many," "certain," "often")
- Is it merely an example or possibility?
Key principle: Only unqualified, universal statements can satisfy "must happen."
3. Spot Explicit Exclusions
Look for language indicating something does NOT occur at the location:
- "Leave to do X" (X doesn't happen there)
- "Before X" or "After X" (X happens at a different time/place)
- "Instead of X" (X is replaced by something else)
Key principle: For "must not happen," you need clear evidence of exclusion, not just absence of mention.
4. Test Necessity
For each potential "must happen" answer, ask: "Could the location still be [the defined thing] without this characteristic?" If yes, it's not necessary. If no, it's a defining feature.
Applying the Framework: A Simple Example
Passage: "A rookery is a breeding area where seabirds nest in large colonies. The birds compete for prime nesting spots on the cliff faces. Some rookeries are used for multiple consecutive years. Scientists often observe the rookeries to study territorial behavior."
Let's apply the MUST Framework:
Step 1: Map All Claims
- Breeding area
- Seabirds nest there
- Large colonies (multiple birds)
- Competition for nesting spots
- On cliff faces (in this example)
- Some used for multiple years
- Scientists observe them
Step 2: Universalize or Qualify
- Breeding area: Universal (unqualified)
- Nesting occurs: Universal ("where seabirds nest")
- Large colonies: Universal ("in large colonies" - no qualifier)
- Cliff faces: Specific example only (not stated universally)
- Multiple years: Contingent ("some rookeries")
- Scientific observation: Common but not required
Step 3: Spot Explicit Exclusions
No explicit exclusions mentioned in this example
Step 4: Test Necessity
- Could it be a rookery without cliff faces? Yes—other locations could work
- Could it be a rookery without multiple birds gathering? No—"colonies" requires multiple individuals
- Could it be a rookery without nesting? No—explicitly defined as where they nest
Answer:
- Must happen: Birds nesting in large groups
- Must not happen: None explicitly excluded in this passage
Practice Exercise 1: Simple Application
Passage: "A hibernaculum is a shelter where animals spend the winter in dormancy. Some hibernacula are used by the same animals year after year. Animals leave the hibernaculum in spring to hunt for food."
Question: What must happen in a hibernaculum, and what must NOT happen there?
Options:
- Spending winter in dormancy
- Repeated use by the same animals
- Hunting for food
- Animals gathering together
Answer:
- Must happen: Spending winter in dormancy (stated universally, defines the concept)
- Must NOT happen: Hunting for food (explicitly stated that animals "leave to hunt"—hunting is excluded)
Analysis of wrong answers:
- "Repeated use" - Says "some hibernacula," so not universal
- "Animals gathering together" - Not mentioned; we don't know if it's solitary or group
Practice Exercise 2: Complex Application
Passage: "An agora was a central public space in ancient Greek cities where citizens gathered for assemblies and commerce. While the agora served as the heart of political debate, with speakers addressing crowds from elevated platforms, certain religious ceremonies were conducted at temples located near, but outside, the agora itself. Many agorae featured colonnaded walkways called stoas, which provided shade. The agora's role as a meeting place for civic discourse made it essential to democratic governance."
Question: Based on this definition, which activities must happen in an agora, and which must NOT happen there?
Options:
- Political assemblies
- Religious ceremonies
- Commercial transactions
- Having colonnaded walkways
- Civic discourse among citizens
Answer:
Must happen:
- Political assemblies (stated universally: "citizens gathered for assemblies")
- Commercial transactions (stated universally: "gathered for...commerce")
- Civic discourse among citizens (stated universally: "meeting place for civic discourse")
Must NOT happen:
- Religious ceremonies (explicitly stated these occurred "near, but outside, the agora itself")
Analysis of wrong answers:
- "Having colonnaded walkways" - Says "many agorae," not all, so it's contingent
Framework application:
- Map: Listed all activities
- Universalize: Distinguished "many agorae" (some) from unqualified statements (all)
- Spot exclusions: "Outside the agora" explicitly excludes religious ceremonies
- Test necessity: Could an agora exist without stoas? Yes (only "many" have them)
Key Takeaways
- "Some" disqualifies: Any characteristic qualified by "some," "many," "certain," or "often" cannot be a "must happen" answer—by definition, it doesn't apply universally.
- Explicit exclusions only: For "must NOT happen," you need clear evidence that something is excluded—phrases like "leave to," "outside the," "before/after," or "instead of."
- Absence isn't exclusion: If something isn't mentioned, you can't conclude it must NOT happen. You need positive evidence of exclusion.
- Test the negative: Before selecting "must happen," ask: "Could every single instance lack this feature?" If yes, it's not necessary.
The GMAT rewards precision. When a question asks what "must" happen, it's not asking what typically happens, what often happens, or what might happen. It's asking what happens in every single instance, without exception. Train yourself to see this distinction, and you'll transform these questions from puzzles into straightforward logical exercises.
Master the Hardest TPA Questions Live
The "some" vs. "all" distinction is critical—but it's just one piece of the puzzle. The hardest TPA questions require you to own the dataset systematically, the way 750+ scorers do.
SESSION 1: Master the Hardest TPA Questions using Owning the Dataset
📅 Date: Monday, November 11, 2025
⏰ Time: 9:00 PM IST (10:30 AM EST / 7:30 AM PST)
⏱️ Duration: 90 minutes
What You'll Learn:
- The systematic "Own the Dataset" framework for dominating 705+ level TPA questions
- How to identify and avoid precision traps in the hardest questions (with real GMAT examples)
- The approach that eliminates confusion under time pressure
Students targeting DI83+ (90th percentile) who understand TPA fundamentals but struggle with the hardest questions.
→ REGISTER FOR THE SESSION NOW
→]
05 Nov 2025, 09:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thank you for posting and sharing. This is nice but I think it could be done a lot shorter.
Here is also a short version that some may find useful:
When GMAT TPA Asks What Must Happen vs. What Must Not
These questions test whether you can distinguish defining traits from optional ones. “Must happen” refers to conditions true in all cases; “must not” refers to explicit exclusions. Confusing “common” with “required” causes systematic error.
Core Principle
Only unqualified statements describe what must occur. Any feature introduced with “some,” “many,” or “often” is optional. “Must not” answers require clear exclusion signals such as “outside,” “after,” or “leave to.”
The MUST Framework
Example
“A plaza is a public square where people gather for festivals. Some plazas have fountains. People leave to shop nearby.”
Key Takeaways
Here is also a short version that some may find useful:
When GMAT TPA Asks What Must Happen vs. What Must Not
These questions test whether you can distinguish defining traits from optional ones. “Must happen” refers to conditions true in all cases; “must not” refers to explicit exclusions. Confusing “common” with “required” causes systematic error.
Core Principle
Only unqualified statements describe what must occur. Any feature introduced with “some,” “many,” or “often” is optional. “Must not” answers require clear exclusion signals such as “outside,” “after,” or “leave to.”
The MUST Framework
- Map claims – list all traits.
- Qualify – mark universal vs. partial statements.
- Spot exclusions – identify language that rules something out.
- Test necessity – if the concept can exist without a feature, it isn’t required.
Example
“A plaza is a public square where people gather for festivals. Some plazas have fountains. People leave to shop nearby.”
- Must happen: gathering for festivals.
- Must not happen: shopping inside the plaza.
- Optional: fountains (“some”).
Key Takeaways
- “Some” ≠ “must.”
- Only explicit negatives justify “must not.”
- Lack of mention isn’t exclusion.
- Always ask: could the thing exist without this trait?
Moderator:
