I believe that this question is controversial. The word "responsible" in the last sentence of the stem can generate two interpretations leading to different answer choices:
First read: "drivers who crawl are responsible" meaning that these drivers take an act to cause accidents (e.g.: excite other drivers to drive recklessly). This leads to answer choice A
Second read: "drivers who crawl are responsible" meaning that these drivers, themselves, account for a larger proportion of overall accidents. Then, the only way for the population in the city to assume that drivers who speed account for more accidents (when actually don't) is to prove that they cause more fatal accidents. This would explain why the population thinks the speed drivers are more likely to cause the accidents. This leads to answer choice B.
I'm curious to have my eyes on the official explanation.
akhil911 wrote:
Traffic Cop: Most people in this city assume that drivers who speed are more likely to cause accidents than are drivers who “crawl,” or consistently drive ten or more miles below the speed limit. But while accidents involving speeding drivers tend to be more graphic and thus more prone to becoming fixed in the public memory, drivers who crawl are actually responsible for far more traffic accidents throughout the city.
Which of the following, if true, best explains the unexpected result given above?
A. Drivers who “crawl” are more likely to excite other drivers to drive recklessly in attempts to get around them.
B. Drivers who speed cause more fatal accidents than do drivers who “crawl.”
C. Most people in the city dislike drivers who speed.
D. Drivers who “crawl” tend to drive safer cars than drivers who speed.
E. Drivers who speed are unlikely to obey posted traffic signs.
I came across this question in one of the practice tests i was doing and will post the answer given there later.