Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:30 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sudarshan22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 30 Jan 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2019
Posts: 629
Own Kudos:
2,471
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,131
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 629
Kudos: 2,471
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
aytidagupta
Joined: 27 Sep 2017
Last visit: 26 May 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V31
GRE 1: Q167 V153
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V31
GRE 1: Q167 V153
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Shrinidhi
Joined: 25 Aug 2016
Last visit: 21 Jun 2020
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 48
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sudarshan22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 30 Jan 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2019
Posts: 629
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,131
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 629
Kudos: 2,471
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation :

The correct idiom is credited with, so eliminate (A) and (B), choice (C) has the correct idiom, but replaces who with that. Always use who when referring to people.

Choice (E) adds an extra unnecessary word, which changes the meaning of the sentence.

Choice (D) contains the correct idiom, and is the correct answer.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sudarshan22

Project SC Butler: Day 80: Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here
Trevor Baylis, an accomplished British swimmer who fell just short of qualifying for the 1965 Olympics and later worked as stuntman, is also a brilliant mind who is credited as the invention of the wind-up radio.

(A) who is credited as

(B) that credited as

(C) that is credited with

(D) who is credited with

(E) who is credited with having


The best/excellent answers get kudos, which will be awarded after the answer is revealed.
There may be no best/excellent answers, or a there may be a few excellent answers!

In OA(D), isn't the pronoun 'who' too far from the noun TB that it modifies?

Trevor Baylis is also a brilliant mind who is credited with the invention of the wind-up radio.


AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , other experts - please enlighten
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,580
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,580
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
In OA(D), isn't the pronoun 'who' too far from the noun TB that it modifies?

Trevor Baylis is also a brilliant mind who is credited with the invention of the wind-up radio.
Debatably, in this case, "mind" is a synonym for "person." If you agree with that interpretation, then the pronoun placement is fine.

Otherwise, yes, the pronoun would be separated by too many sentence elements from what it refer too.

Here's a somewhat similar example:

Jim is an archeologist who studies Native American sites.

In this case, "who" refers to "archeologist," rather than to "Jim."
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrian
User avatar
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2022
Posts: 416
Own Kudos:
3,219
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 416
Kudos: 3,219
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
And just to add on a strategic point here...note that if you cut out the big modifying phrase between "Trevor Baylis" and "is" you end up with a pretty short thought:

Trevor Baylis is also a brilliant mind who is credited

Which shows that the sentence is treating "a brilliant mind" as a direct description for Trevor (like "is a mechanic" or "is a swimmer" would be). "Trevor is a brilliant mind" sets "brilliant mind" as almost a synonym for the person (as opposed to "Trevor has a brilliant mind" in which case you couldn't use "who" there at all). Because the stripped down sentence takes that care to define the mind as the person (and not a possession of a person), I'd use that as my justification for "okay I guess who fits as a modifier, because the sentence is telling me to treat it this way."

Where I find HUGE debate with this question...Olympics are always in even-numbered years (and summer Olympic years are always divisible by 4)! There were no 1965 Olympics! (probably a typo for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics)
User avatar
prabsahi
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Last visit: 24 Mar 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Products:
Posts: 216
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepBrian
And just to add on a strategic point here...note that if you cut out the big modifying phrase between "Trevor Baylis" and "is" you end up with a pretty short thought:

Trevor Baylis is also a brilliant mind who is credited

Which shows that the sentence is treating "a brilliant mind" as a direct description for Trevor (like "is a mechanic" or "is a swimmer" would be). "Trevor is a brilliant mind" sets "brilliant mind" as almost a synonym for the person (as opposed to "Trevor has a brilliant mind" in which case you couldn't use "who" there at all). Because the stripped down sentence takes that care to define the mind as the person (and not a possession of a person), I'd use that as my justification for "okay I guess who fits as a modifier, because the sentence is telling me to treat it this way."

Where I find HUGE debate with this question...Olympics are always in even-numbered years (and summer Olympic years are always divisible by 4)! There were no 1965 Olympics! (probably a typo for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics)


Hello VeritasPrepBrian,

Trevor Baylis, an accomplished British swimmer who fell just short of qualifying for the 1965 Olympics and later worked as stuntman, is also a brilliant mind who is credited as the invention of the wind-up radio.

Had a query ...is my line of thought of correct..
If I replace who with Mind..It says... Someone's mind (Trevor's) is credited with the invention of the wind-up radio.I guess its more apt to mention as ..

A person can be credited with the invention...
(again its debatable)
For example,

Einstein's mind is credited with the invention of "Theory of relativity".
vs
Einstein is credited with the invention of "Theory of relativity".
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrian
User avatar
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2022
Posts: 416
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 416
Kudos: 3,219
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The big difference here is that the sentence is treating "a brilliant mind" as the person, not as one of many body parts within that person. By saying that Trevor "is a brilliant mind" they're equating Trevor with "brilliant mind" (as opposed to saying Trevor "has" a brilliant mind, which would make the mind one of his body parts).

A similar example would be "In a recent movie, Matt Damon starred as "The Brain," a scientist who..." Here "The Brain" is the name of a character, so you'd treat that as a person, and therefore the modifier "a scientist" (which can modify a person but not a body part) would be a valid modifier.

NOW...the great thing about GMAC is that it statistically tests all of its questions for cultural bias so if it were a case where people in one area of the world (here in the U.S. I think it's pretty common to see someone called "a brilliant mind" and to know that that term applies to a person, but if you didn't grow up with that euphemism I could see it being tough) get the problem right way more frequently than people elsewhere, they'll flag it and investigate before it would ever affect your score. BUT I'd be leery of depending on that, so the lesson I'd take away here is that that word "is" equates Trevor with "brilliant mind" so it's logical to use "brilliant mind" with modifiers for a person.
User avatar
prabsahi
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Last visit: 24 Mar 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
289
 [1]
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Products:
Posts: 216
Kudos: 289
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepBrian
The big difference here is that the sentence is treating "a brilliant mind" as the person, not as one of many body parts within that person. By saying that Trevor "is a brilliant mind" they're equating Trevor with "brilliant mind" (as opposed to saying Trevor "has" a brilliant mind, which would make the mind one of his body parts).

A similar example would be "In a recent movie, Matt Damon starred as "The Brain," a scientist who..." Here "The Brain" is the name of a character, so you'd treat that as a person, and therefore the modifier "a scientist" (which can modify a person but not a body part) would be a valid modifier.

NOW...the great thing about GMAC is that it statistically tests all of its questions for cultural bias so if it were a case where people in one area of the world (here in the U.S. I think it's pretty common to see someone called "a brilliant mind" and to know that that term applies to a person, but if you didn't grow up with that euphemism I could see it being tough) get the problem right way more frequently than people elsewhere, they'll flag it and investigate before it would ever affect your score. BUT I'd be leery of depending on that, so the lesson I'd take away here is that that word "is" equates Trevor with "brilliant mind" so it's logical to use "brilliant mind" with modifiers for a person.


That's a real deep explanation.Each of your posts is worth learning something from. :)


Thanks
User avatar
hiranmay
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Last visit: 22 Jun 2024
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 459
Kudos: 560
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Trevor Baylis, an accomplished British swimmer who fell just short of qualifying for the 1965 Olympics and later worked as stuntman, is also a brilliant mind who is credited as the invention of the wind-up radio.

(A) who is credited as --> "credited with" is correct idiom: someone is credited with something

(B) that credited as --> same as A

(C) that is credited with --> "a brilliant mind" is person, so relative pronoun "who" should be used

(D) who is credited with --> correct

(E) who is credited with having
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,831
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts