Question 1.
This is a direct question from the passage and an easy one. As the passage says, "as five hours of 60-knot storm winds will put more momentum into the water than a week of 10-knot breezes."
Therefore, the only option to mention this build up of momentum is Option (C).
Question 2.
The passage primarily discusses about turbulent flow over a boundary and if required, can be extrapolated to turbulent flow of wind over water (a boundary).
A. oceanic momentum and current ---- Not at all, since it ignores the primary concern of the passage, how wind flows over a boundary.
B. turbulent flow of wind over water ----- seems to be correct, when extrapolated and the boundary is considered water. We can consider the first paragraph as background information.
C. wind blowing over water as related to causing tidal flow ----- The passage is more about how wind behaves rather than causing tidal flow
D. the significance of high wind conditions on ocean momentum ----- This separates out only a specific portion of passage. Too NARROW.
E. experiments in wind force ---- "Experiments" is too BROAD.
Question 3.
A. air momentum is converted directly into increased ocean current ----- therefore results in storms, STRENGTHENS
B. high speed winds slip over waves as easily as low speed winds ---- seems a WEAKENING statement, since if high wind slips as easily as a low one, then winds might not result into storms by transferring considerable momentum.
C. waves do not move in the direction of wind ---- might help the high and low winds both to gain momentum, partially strengthens
D. the force exerted on a wheat field was the same as on mown grass ---- does not affect much, implies both high and low winds will act the same way
E. the force of wind under normal conditions increased as the square of wind speed ---- already mentioned in the passage
Kudos will be appreciated!