It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 08:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 12:58
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:26) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpretation of certain footprints that were left among other footprints in hardened volcanic ash at site G. Dr. Tyson claims they are clearly early hominid footprints since they show human characteristics: a squarish heel and a big toe immediately adjacent to the next toe. However, since the footprints indicate that if hominids made those prints they would have had to walk in an unexpected cross-stepping manner, by placing the left foot to the right of the right foot. Dr. Rees rejects Dr. Tyson’s conclusion.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines Dr. Tyson’s conclusion?
(A) The foot prints showing human characteristics were clearly those of at least two distinct individuals.
(B) Certain species of bears had feet very like human feet, except that the outside toe on each foot was the biggest toe and the innermost toe was the smallest toe.
(C) Footprints shaped like a human’s that do not show a cross-stepping pattern exist at site M, which is a mile away from site G, and the two sets of footprints are contemporaneous.
(D) When the moist volcanic ash became sealed under additional layers of ash before hardening, some details of some of the footprints were erased.
(E) Most of the other footprints at site G were of animals with hooves.

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 13:18
B?

When the left foot and the right foot are put beside each other, it can be clearly seen that the outer toe is the biggest, this would make them bears feet.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 13:30
Agree with (B) as thats the only statement that actually talks about the shape of the foot prints and if a bear's foot print closely matches that of the footprints found, Dr.Tyson's conclusion is weakened.
_________________

To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 781

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 13:30
Answer: C

Here argument assumes hominid footprints assume human characteristics and unexpected cross-stepping manner. The assumption can be weekend if we show some other animals have the foot prints that show human characteristics or other than unexpected cross-stepping manner.

(A) The foot prints showing human characteristics were clearly those of at least two distinct individuals. [This strengthens the Dr. Tyson’s Conclusion]

(B) Certain species of bears had feet very like human feet, except that the outside toe on each foot was the biggest toe and the innermost toe was the smallest toe [Here we are taking about footprints and pattern]

(C) Footprints shaped like a human’s that do not show a cross-stepping pattern exist at site M, which is a mile away from site G, and the two sets of footprints are contemporaneous.[Hold it]

(D) When the moist volcanic ash became sealed under additional layers of ash before hardening, some details of some of the footprints were erased. [irreverent]

(E) Most of the other footprints at site G were of animals with hooves. [irreverent]

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 13:52
It cant be C.

C actually strengthens Dr Tyson's argument by saying that the footprints possibly belong to C.

B is the correct answer

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2008, 16:58
Agree with B

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 1

Re: Nice CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2008, 10:46
IMO B)

Interesting Q

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 1

Re: Nice CR   [#permalink] 06 Sep 2008, 10:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.