Hi SweetVault,I see exactly where this is snagging. You're reading "
at least 10 units of type A" as if it fixed type A at
10. That's the one spot to fix.
"At least
10" is a
minimum, not a set value. It means A could be
10, or
11, or
12, or
50 - anything from
10 upward. The question asks for
how many A must be produced, i.e., a single definite number. A range from
10 up doesn't pin down one number.
Two cases that both obey Statement (2):- A =
10, B =
15- A =
11, B =
20Both satisfy "at least
10 A and at least
15 B," yet type A is a different number in each. Same statement - two different answers -
Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.Why C worksStatement (2) alone has no cap stopping A from climbing. What forces A down to exactly
10 is the
80-hour limit, and that only enters once you bring in Statement (1).
From (
1): each A costs
2 hours, each B costs
4 hours, so
2A +
4B ≤
80. Now apply the minimums from (
2): the smallest possible hours are
2(
10) +
4(
15) =
20 +
60 =
80 - that already uses up every available hour. So there's no room to make even one extra widget of either type. A is locked at exactly
10.
That's the key: the minimum from (
2) plus the ceiling from (
1) squeeze together to a single point. Neither statement does that alone - you need
both, so the answer is
C.
Takeaway for DS: "at least" gives a range, and a range isn't a definite answer unless another constraint closes it off.
Answer: CSweetVault
Confused here, How many widgets of type A *must* be produced?
Answer = given in B alone; "Every week, at least 10 units of type A widgets *must* be produced. Therefore, answer = 10