Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:57 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:57
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
MHIKER
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 942
Own Kudos:
5,644
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 942
Kudos: 5,644
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 03 Jan 2021, 10:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goalsnr
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.


(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
Show more

"Was never applied" is a completely gone event. That is it's indicating passive of past indefinite tense. But from the latter part of the sentence, we understand that congress is still required to consider the act. So, the correct verb will be Present perfect tense. A, B, and C are eliminated. These options also have pronoun ambiguity "it".

D used "whereby" which indicates a place but there is not place immediately before whereby. D is eliminated

The answer is E.
avatar
pk6969
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 02 Jan 2022
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Babson CBS '23 Broad
GPA: 3.2
Schools: Babson CBS '23 Broad
Posts: 136
Kudos: 14
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 17 Oct 2021, 05:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goalsnr
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.


(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 133: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Show more

Hi AndrewN
I am working on tenses currently and in this question If we had option E with "was" instead of "has been", would that make it wrong? Because if has never been applied is used, then it was never applied must be correct too. So, the question is does the use of "has never been applied" is superior to "was never applied " in E?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,510
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,510
 [1]
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 17 Oct 2021, 11:37
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pk6969
goalsnr
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.


(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 133: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

Hi AndrewN
I am working on tenses currently and in this question If we had option E with "was" instead of "has been", would that make it wrong? Because if has never been applied is used, then it was never applied must be correct too. So, the question is does the use of "has never been applied" is superior to "was never applied " in E?
Show more
Hello, pk6969. If was were used in place of has been in (E), then that would present a problem. The simple past would make it seem as if the Constitution was no longer utilized, and we would have trouble reconciling the tense with is required subsequently. I would expect to see Congress would have been required or something similar. But that does not address the original meaning issue. To convey that the Constitution is still in effect, has been should be used instead. It is a seemingly innocuous issue, but the verb tense makes a huge difference.

I would not, I did not, look to the verb tense first thing to start eliminating. Rather, I would pick off the easy stuff, such as the it at the end of answer choices (A), (B), and (C), an it that apparently refers to the action of calling a convention. The same three answers then fall on a simple technicality, not on a nuanced understanding of the sentence. Between (D) and (E), the former is not even a sentence, so (E) wins, hands down. Keep matters as simple as you can. I love reading for meaning, but when it comes to SC, I enjoy narrowing the answer pool by putting in the least amount of effort and then working with whatever is left.

I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
100mitra
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 714
Own Kudos:
629
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 714
Kudos: 629
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 13 Jan 2022, 03:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Eliminate A, B, and C
- pronoun "it" has not referrenace
- was is past tense, has is present tense
- Option C - Wrong usage of "whereby", this word is defined as in agreement with which, by which or through which
- Option B, phrase "there has been a requirement" -(wordy)
- the legislatures of two-thirds of the states formally asked Congress - is correct

Original Sentence A:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied,
Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document
when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

(B) was never applied,
there has been a requirement that -(wordy)
Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document
when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied,
whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document
when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied,
whereby - Error
Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document
when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied,
Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document
when formally asked to do so - Correct
User avatar
Taulark1
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
43
Given Kudos: 750
Posts: 128
Kudos: 43
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 26 Nov 2022, 00:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
i have a question reqarding the tense in the correct answer option-
(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

How can Congress be required to do something in the present , when the provision is not even applied [since has never applied means- effect is still is in the present ]

I ask this because we used the same reasoning to eliminate option A by saying that when something was never applied , so how can congress be required to something in the present.
Basically in the correct option , the provision is still not applied right?

Will really appreciate the help on this! thanks in advance :)
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [2]
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 28 Nov 2022, 14:30
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Taulark1


The present tense in E is describing an ongoing conditional relationship: WHEN 2/3 of states ask for a Constitutional convention, Congress IS REQUIRED to convene one. For instance, I might say, "As a Federal employee, Jackie is required to return any gifts she receives from clients." We might say this even if Jackie has never received a gift from a client. The requirement is still in place. We might also say this if she hasn't followed the requirement. She's required to return gifts, but has not complied.

In the case of the US, the condition has yet to be fulfilled. 2/3 of states have never asked for a Constitutional convention, but Congress IS required to make it happen if such a request occurs. Of course, we don't need to know this outside fact to get the question right. It works just as well if we assume that Congress has not fulfilled its duty. All we need to know is that the sentence is describing a current conditional that has never been triggered.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 29 Nov 2022, 03:16
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Taulark1
egmat
i have a question reqarding the tense in the correct answer option-
(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

How can Congress be required to do something in the present , when the provision is not even applied [since has never applied means- effect is still is in the present ]

I ask this because we used the same reasoning to eliminate option A by saying that when something was never applied , so how can congress be required to something in the present.
Basically in the correct option , the provision is still not applied right?

Will really appreciate the help on this! thanks in advance :)
Show more

Hey Taulark1

Hope you're doing well.

Building on what DmitryFarber has said, let's take a closer look at choice E.

Choice E: Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.


Aspects of Meaning:

    1. The topic of discussion is the process of making changes to the US Constitution.
    2. The Congress refers to the legislative body of the USA (Federal Government).
    3. If the legislative bodies of two-thirds of the states (or more) (i.e. State governments of a minimum of 34 of 50 states) formally ask the Congress (Federal Government) to amend the Constitution, the Congress must call (or is required to call) a convention (meeting/conference) to consider those amendments.
    4. This requirement/procedure/provision/law is written in the Constitution itself.
    5. However, this provision has never been applied as yet. In other words, two-thirds of the states (or more) have never formally asked the Congress to amend the Constitution till today.

So, the simple present tense "is required" has been used to convey a Universal Truth/Law mentioned in the US Constitution. The present perfect tense "has never been applied" is just a separate fact that says that this Law/Provision has not been applied till date.


Choice A: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

    1. The Simple Past Tense "that was never applied" implies that this provision no longer exists and that this provision was never applied even when it existed.
    2. The Present Perfect Tense "has been required" implies this requirement has been enforced every time attempts were made to change the constitution in the Past.
    3. This creates a conflict/contradiction between the two highlighted portions of 1 and 2 above.
This is why choice A makes no sense and can be eliminated.

I hope this helps improve your understanding.


Happy Learning!

Abhishek
User avatar
Taulark1
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
43
 [1]
Given Kudos: 750
Posts: 128
Kudos: 43
 [1]
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 29 Nov 2022, 04:31
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat , DmitryFarber , thanks for the awesome explanations!!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress 20 Dec 2023, 21:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts