Vanderbilt is a model of excellence in these matters. They are an especially good comparison because:
1) they rank around the same as UW
2) they also bill themselves as the "kinder, gentler" mba (not cut-throat)
My point is this: being a "low pressure MBA" doesn't mean they need to be flaky with getting information to students, or waiting until the last possible minute, and then sending out a placeholder that says "you will find out later".
I think Foster is an excellent school - one that I will most likely choose to attend (over other schools, such as vanderbilt). For students that are unable to take the time to come out and see the campus and meet the students, many will have the following train of thought:
-The application process is a chance for schools to put their BEST foot forward
-Most schools go out of their way to make applicants feel comfortable, and make themselves look good
-Therefore what I experience on a daily basis as a student will likely be the same, or worse than my applicant experience (since they no longer need to impress me)
-If Foster's applicant experience is sub-par, then why should I expect the school to be a good experience as a student.
Again, I know the last time i mentioned this people said "but UW is a low-pressure, collaborative school". Yes, it is. But there is nothing that says the "kinder, gentler" places need to be so lacking in how they represent themselves. Negative kudos for anyone that says being a "supportive" school means being flaky
Also, to repeat this: I think it is a great school - that I will probably choose to attend over other schools (Vandy,UNC) and they simply could improve how they showcase it!
Let me bring this one home:
Most people would agree that personality and competence are the most important factors at work. And yet, every one of you still shower regularly, brush your teeth, comb your hair, wear decent clothes, and just otherwise make yourself presentable for work. Face it. Presentation matters, and UW could use some improvement in this area!