Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
80%
(01:18)
correct 20%
(00:49)
wrong
based on 35
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B.The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.
C.The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D.Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E.The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B.The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.
C.The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D.Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E.The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.