Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:33 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
refurb
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Last visit: 30 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Schools:Tuck
Posts: 1,321
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
trader1
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
Posts: 385
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
solaris1
Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,431
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Concentration: General Management
Schools:NYU Stern '11
Posts: 1,431
Kudos: 223
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
trader1
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
Posts: 385
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
solaris1
That's pretty crazy considering the FDIC has promised to insure every single dollar in deposits at a financial institution like Citi (with no restrictions on the amount) until December 31, 2009.

trader1
The way I interpret this is that whoever is buying bonds at a negative yield is very worried about keeping their cash in a financial institution and would rather get it out of the bank and accept a negative yielding promise to pay from the US government.

They can promise all they want. Doesn't mean you'll get your money on time or at all.

No way FDIC can guarantee those deposits with the limited assets they have.
User avatar
bsd_lover
Joined: 17 May 2007
Last visit: 15 Mar 2020
Posts: 2,432
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 2,432
Kudos: 1,735
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Australian govt. has given similar guarantees. But guarantees don't mean much in times such as these. I think that high net worth folks would try to diversify to protect assets and these bonds would be form part of a portfolio that would contain other safe bets (such as gold).

trader1
solaris1
That's pretty crazy considering the FDIC has promised to insure every single dollar in deposits at a financial institution like Citi (with no restrictions on the amount) until December 31, 2009.

trader1
The way I interpret this is that whoever is buying bonds at a negative yield is very worried about keeping their cash in a financial institution and would rather get it out of the bank and accept a negative yielding promise to pay from the US government.

They can promise all they want. Doesn't mean you'll get your money on time or at all.

No way FDIC can guarantee those deposits with the limited assets they have.
User avatar
IHateTheGMAT
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Last visit: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 623
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Investment Banking or Investment Management
Posts: 623
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
trader1
solaris1
That's pretty crazy considering the FDIC has promised to insure every single dollar in deposits at a financial institution like Citi (with no restrictions on the amount) until December 31, 2009.

trader1
The way I interpret this is that whoever is buying bonds at a negative yield is very worried about keeping their cash in a financial institution and would rather get it out of the bank and accept a negative yielding promise to pay from the US government.

They can promise all they want. Doesn't mean you'll get your money on time or at all.

No way FDIC can guarantee those deposits with the limited assets they have.

How can you say that the guarantee of the FDIC (the US Federal Government) is worthless while at the same time saying that the guarantee of US Treasury Bills (the US Federal Government) is not worthless? Pretty illogical IMO.
User avatar
trader1
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
Posts: 385
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IHateTheGMAT

How can you say that the guarantee of the FDIC (the US Federal Government) is worthless while at the same time saying that the guarantee of US Treasury Bills (the US Federal Government) is not worthless? Pretty illogical IMO.

I'm not trying to be defensive, but I never said anything regarding the worth or worthlessness of US Treasury Bills. I only stated the fact that a T-bill is a "promise to pay". And, as I said in the other post you reference, they (the US Federal Government) can promise all they want.

Next time, I'll be sure my sarcasm towards the US Federal Government's current insolvency is more apparent in each of my posts ;)

Oh....but I forgot we can print our own currency....hmmm....moral hazard?