Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:11 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,346
 [20]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,346
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,346
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,346
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Smel0v
Joined: 04 Aug 2022
Last visit: 27 Feb 2023
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
6
 [3]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 5
Kudos: 6
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. The question and answers are too ambiguous.

"intended to change" looks like it was his idea to change the color, but the color could also be changed, if someone else in the company made such a suggestion (management/marketing/...), and the only thing that CEO had to do was to approve this solution. So, it's not proper to say that "it was the CEO who INTENDED to ...". He may not have intended to do anything.

"CEO is more interested in boosting sales" - interested as a manager, not a person who "intends to change the color". If marketing says that "Cars with silver and gold coloured seats are purchased at a rate more than three times that for cars with the heritage white coloured seats", almost every sensible CEO will say "let's change the colors then!"
User avatar
kop18
Joined: 30 Sep 2020
Last visit: 09 Jan 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
GMAT 1: 610 Q40 V35
GMAT 1: 610 Q40 V35
Posts: 90
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do not completely understand this question. Whether the conclusion is boosting sales or interest in boosting sales is not quite clear to me. My conclusion, as per the argument, was that the change in color will boost sales. For me, it was immaterial whether the CEO intended to boost sales or not - the argument according to me assumes that there indeed must be a correlation between the sales and color to assume that it will actually lead to boost in sales.
Can someone please help me out here?
User avatar
Krishna7568
Joined: 02 Aug 2021
Last visit: 14 Feb 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.73
Posts: 15
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question but I don't agree with the explanation. Answer should be E as if sales are improved then only magazine editors criticized can say that the new CEO is more interested in boosting sales.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,000
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,000
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krishna7568
I think this is a high-quality question but I don't agree with the explanation. Answer should be E as if sales are improved then only magazine editors criticized can say that the new CEO is more interested in boosting sales.

As assumption is a missing necessary premise.

Is it necessary that gold and silver seat cars are purchased three times more than white seat cars? No.
Though it sure seems like an assumption that gold and silver seat cars sell more than white seat cars (and hence the charge of 'boosting sales'). But more could be a little more, 1.5 times, twice, 10 times etc too. What says that it must be three times more?

Remember that assumptions do not have random figures in them. Any figure an assumption uses must come from the argument.

Here, the argument must tell us that the new CEO is trying to boost sales to more than 3 times the current sales or something like that. Then the assumption could refer to this 'more than 3 times' figure.
Do understand that these are general guidelines. The answer is based upon the exact wordings of the question and all the given options.
User avatar
ritik0212
Joined: 02 Feb 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q88 V81 DI83
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q88 V81 DI83
Posts: 15
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
Founder
42387 posts