Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 19 Jul 2019, 13:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# V04-06

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56300

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2014, 02:00
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (00:51) correct 45% (00:52) wrong based on 101 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56300

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2014, 02:00
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1100
Location: India

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2015, 04:10
Bunuel wrote:
James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

James did two things
1. He relied or depended upon his
exceptional cinematography skills and
understanding of innovative new technologies.
2. Depending on his skills, he integrated his movie scenes with special effects.

banked is in past tense. so integration must be a past event and needs to be mentioned as integrated.
A and B can be eliminated by this rule.
D changes the meaning of the sentence as if James is integrated with his art sequences and in his movie scenes modifier is misplaced.
Depending on his skills, he integrated his movie scenes with special effects but conjunction and in option E gives the meaning as if integrating and banking upon skills are two parallel actions thereby deviating the intended meaning.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2016
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 07:02
The pronoun his doesn't have an antecedent. Hence C option is wrong, E though corrects the mistake
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2870
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 10:30
rahul786 wrote:
The pronoun his doesn't have an antecedent. Hence C option is wrong, E though corrects the mistake

"James Cameron" is the unambiguous antecedent of "his" in option C. A pronoun may come before the antecedent - such construction is alright.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 176
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2016, 05:28
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he

I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2870
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2016, 08:06
felippemed wrote:
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he

I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?

Option C is alright. It is not very uncommon in GMAT that the pronoun precedes the noun it refers to.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 176
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2016, 09:11
sayantanc2k wrote:
felippemed wrote:
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he

I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?

Option C is alright. It is not very uncommon in GMAT that the pronoun precedes the noun it refers to.

Nice! Thanks for the tip
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 70

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2017, 18:48
I agree with OA and OE. However I need a small clarification. In option E there are two ANDs.... (i.e. …. effect sequences and banked on …. and understanding of … )

Should that be another reason for E to be incorrect? (I mean other than the OE). Experts, please clarify. I am just trying to seek clarification whether use of multiple ANDs is OKAY in constructions like these.
Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2018
Posts: 7
Schools: Rotman '20
GMAT 1: 410 Q23 V21
GPA: 3.24

### Show Tags

04 May 2018, 16:22
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Bunuel, I have one problem with this answer and would appreciate if you explain. If we choose C, there is a comma between James Cameron and "banked", which makes no sense. Wouldn't it be right to include the comma as an underlined item for correction?
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Posts: 1
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35

### Show Tags

30 May 2018, 06:17
Fifina wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Bunuel, I have one problem with this answer and would appreciate if you explain. If we choose C, there is a comma between James Cameron and "banked", which makes no sense. Wouldn't it be right to include the comma as an underlined item for correction?

Even i got confused with the comma , but it seems like the comma is a part of the underlined sentence. In Option C we don't have a comma after 'James Cameron', hence not an issue.
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2017
Posts: 10

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2018, 02:44
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Hi Bunuel,
Would you say this part of the sentence -"In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences"- is an absolute phrase?
Re: V04-06   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2018, 02:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# V04-06

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel