GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 15:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     December 16, 2018

     December 16, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

V04-06

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51218
V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (00:52) correct 44% (00:54) wrong based on 91 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51218
Re V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:00
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
  1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
  2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
  3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
  4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
  5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Answer: C
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1117
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2015, 03:10
Bunuel wrote:
James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and


James did two things
1. He relied or depended upon his
    exceptional cinematography skills and
    understanding of innovative new technologies.
2. Depending on his skills, he integrated his movie scenes with special effects.

banked is in past tense. so integration must be a past event and needs to be mentioned as integrated.
A and B can be eliminated by this rule.
D changes the meaning of the sentence as if James is integrated with his art sequences and in his movie scenes modifier is misplaced.
Depending on his skills, he integrated his movie scenes with special effects but conjunction and in option E gives the meaning as if integrating and banking upon skills are two parallel actions thereby deviating the intended meaning.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2016
Posts: 1
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2016, 06:02
The pronoun his doesn't have an antecedent. Hence C option is wrong, E though corrects the mistake
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2951
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2016, 09:30
rahul786 wrote:
The pronoun his doesn't have an antecedent. Hence C option is wrong, E though corrects the mistake


"James Cameron" is the unambiguous antecedent of "his" in option C. A pronoun may come before the antecedent - such construction is alright.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 181
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2016, 04:28
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he


I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2951
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2016, 07:06
felippemed wrote:
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he


I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?


Option C is alright. It is not very uncommon in GMAT that the pronoun precedes the noun it refers to.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 181
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2016, 08:11
sayantanc2k wrote:
felippemed wrote:
Hi Bunuel and everyone,

I felt uncomfortable with "he" in this part. It seemed to me that it didn't have an antecedent.

Quote:
In his movie scenes, which he


I am confused because I keep asking myself who is "he"?

A better construction shouldn't have James Cameron instead of "he" at the very beggining?


Option C is alright. It is not very uncommon in GMAT that the pronoun precedes the noun it refers to.


Nice! Thanks for the tip
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 70
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2017, 17:48
I agree with OA and OE. However I need a small clarification. In option E there are two ANDs.... (i.e. …. effect sequences and banked on …. and understanding of … )

Should that be another reason for E to be incorrect? (I mean other than the OE). Experts, please clarify. I am just trying to seek clarification whether use of multiple ANDs is OKAY in constructions like these.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Mar 2018
Posts: 7
Location: Canada
Schools: Rotman '20
GMAT 1: 410 Q23 V21
GPA: 3.24
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2018, 15:22
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
  1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
  2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
  3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
  4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
  5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Answer: C


Bunuel, I have one problem with this answer and would appreciate if you explain. If we choose C, there is a comma between James Cameron and "banked", which makes no sense. Wouldn't it be right to include the comma as an underlined item for correction?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Posts: 1
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2018, 05:17
Fifina wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
  1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
  2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
  3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
  4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
  5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Answer: C


Bunuel, I have one problem with this answer and would appreciate if you explain. If we choose C, there is a comma between James Cameron and "banked", which makes no sense. Wouldn't it be right to include the comma as an underlined item for correction?


Even i got confused with the comma , but it seems like the comma is a part of the underlined sentence. In Option C we don't have a comma after 'James Cameron', hence not an issue.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Oct 2017
Posts: 6
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: V04-06  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2018, 01:44
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effect sequences, banked on his exceptional cinematography skills and understanding of innovative new technologies.

A. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences,
B. In his movie scenes, meticulously integrating them with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
C. In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron
D. Meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences, James Cameron, in his movie scenes
E. James Cameron, in his movie scenes, meticulously integrated them with his state of the art special effect sequences and

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify James Cameron and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, James Cameron, and the verb banked. Beginning the sentence with “In his movie scenes” and following that phrase with the relative clause “which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences” allows the subject, James Cameron, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.
  1. The participial phrase does not clearly modifies the noun in the preceding phrase; use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb “banked”.
  2. Phrase meticulously integrating … illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it: movie scenes; James Cameron, not the movie scenes, did the coordinating.
  3. Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.
  4. This sentence is incorrectly implying that “James Cameron” is “meticulously integrated with his...” i.e. meticulously integrated is modifying “James Cameron”. The correct meaning should imply that “James Cameron” meticulously integrated his movie scenes with....
  5. The participial phrase does not clearly modify movie scenes; the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear.

Answer: C


Hi Bunuel,
Would you say this part of the sentence -"In his movie scenes, which he meticulously integrated with his state of the art special effects sequences"- is an absolute phrase?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V04-06 &nbs [#permalink] 27 Nov 2018, 01:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V04-06

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel



Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.