GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Nov 2018, 19:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • How to QUICKLY Solve GMAT Questions - GMAT Club Chat

     November 20, 2018

     November 20, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     November 20, 2018

     November 20, 2018

     06:00 PM EST

     07:00 PM EST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

V06-23

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50627
V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:27
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (00:42) correct 38% (00:55) wrong based on 159 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A negative review of a popular restaurant claimed that the wait staff was rude and the food was overpriced. This review caused sales to drop precipitously which, in turn, forced the original owners to sell the business. The new owners revised the menu and dismissed most of the wait staff. After three months, however, sales had improved by less than 1%.

Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation of why sales at the restaurant have not improved?


A. The new owners could not determine who were the rudest members of the wait staff.
B. New menu items offered by the new owners are now more affordable.
C. The new owners neglected to advertise the fact that the restaurant is now under new management.
D. The new owners began managing the restaurant during the summer, when sales are unusually high.
E. Another restaurant with similarly-priced menu items opened across the street.

_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50627
Re V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:27
Official Solution:


A negative review of a popular restaurant claimed that the wait staff was rude and the food was overpriced. This review caused sales to drop precipitously which, in turn, forced the original owners to sell the business. The new owners revised the menu and dismissed most of the wait staff. After three months, however, sales had improved by less than 1%.

Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation of why sales at the restaurant have not improved?


A. The new owners could not determine who were the rudest members of the wait staff.
B. New menu items offered by the new owners are now more affordable.
C. The new owners neglected to advertise the fact that the restaurant is now under new management.
D. The new owners began managing the restaurant during the summer, when sales are unusually high.
E. Another restaurant with similarly-priced menu items opened across the street.


Situation: Sales have not improved under the new owners of a restaurant, even though they have changed things customers complained about.

Reasoning: Which helps to explain why sales at the restaurant have not improved? The correct answer to this question depends on determining what could keep sales at the restaurant low even after the new owners changed the things complained about in the negative review. Considering that the restaurant lost business after negative publicity, it only stands to reason that the restaurant would need to attract business using positive publicity. If the new owners neglected to inform customers of the positive changes, sales are not likely to increase.
  1. Since the new owners did dismiss most of the wait staff, the question of which members were the rudest is now irrelevant.
  2. This item is actually a reason that sales should have increased.
  3. This item correctly identifies a possible mistake made by the new owners. If negative publicity caused sales to fall, positive publicity – including information about a change in management – would be needed to help sales increase.
  4. This item is another reason sales should have increased after the new owners’ purchase.
  5. The other restaurant could present competition, but this item is not the best explanation for the lack of increase in sales.

Answer: C
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 106
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.47
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2014, 08:28
Hi,

I have a concern with respect to Option A.

The option states that the New owners could not identify "Who were the rudest members of the wait staff? "

From the argument, we have

New owners dismissed most of the wait staff. [Most & Not all.]

From the two statements is it not possible that the New owners dismissed most of the rude wait staff, but still missed few of them.

Now since they have missed them, Option A makes more sense now. Saying the new owners could have missed most some of the wait staff who could have been rude.

Request your inputs on this


Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:


A negative review of a popular restaurant claimed that the wait staff was rude and the food was overpriced. This review caused sales to drop precipitously which, in turn, forced the original owners to sell the business. The new owners revised the menu and dismissed most of the wait staff. After three months, however, sales had improved by less than 1%.

Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation of why sales at the restaurant have not improved?


A. The new owners could not determine who were the rudest members of the wait staff.
B. New menu items offered by the new owners are now more affordable.
C. The new owners neglected to advertise the fact that the restaurant is now under new management.
D. The new owners began managing the restaurant during the summer, when sales are unusually high.
E. Another restaurant with similarly-priced menu items opened across the street.


Situation: Sales have not improved under the new owners of a restaurant, even though they have changed things customers complained about.

Reasoning: Which helps to explain why sales at the restaurant have not improved? The correct answer to this question depends on determining what could keep sales at the restaurant low even after the new owners changed the things complained about in the negative review. Considering that the restaurant lost business after negative publicity, it only stands to reason that the restaurant would need to attract business using positive publicity. If the new owners neglected to inform customers of the positive changes, sales are not likely to increase.
  1. Since the new owners did dismiss most of the wait staff, the question of which members were the rudest is now irrelevant.
  2. This item is actually a reason that sales should have increased.
  3. This item correctly identifies a possible mistake made by the new owners. If negative publicity caused sales to fall, positive publicity – including information about a change in management – would be needed to help sales increase.
  4. This item is another reason sales should have increased after the new owners’ purchase.
  5. The other restaurant could present competition, but this item is not the best explanation for the lack of increase in sales.

Answer: C
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2015
Posts: 8
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2016, 19:59
svijayaug12 wrote:
Hi,

I have a concern with respect to Option A.

The option states that the New owners could not identify "Who were the rudest members of the wait staff? "

From the argument, we have

New owners dismissed most of the wait staff. [Most & Not all.]

From the two statements is it not possible that the New owners dismissed most of the rude wait staff, but still missed few of them.

Now since they have missed them, Option A makes more sense now. Saying the new owners could have missed most some of the wait staff who could have been rude.

Request your inputs on this


Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:


A negative review of a popular restaurant claimed that the wait staff was rude and the food was overpriced. This review caused sales to drop precipitously which, in turn, forced the original owners to sell the business. The new owners revised the menu and dismissed most of the wait staff. After three months, however, sales had improved by less than 1%.

Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation of why sales at the restaurant have not improved?


A. The new owners could not determine who were the rudest members of the wait staff.
B. New menu items offered by the new owners are now more affordable.
C. The new owners neglected to advertise the fact that the restaurant is now under new management.
D. The new owners began managing the restaurant during the summer, when sales are unusually high.
E. Another restaurant with similarly-priced menu items opened across the street.


Situation: Sales have not improved under the new owners of a restaurant, even though they have changed things customers complained about.

Reasoning: Which helps to explain why sales at the restaurant have not improved? The correct answer to this question depends on determining what could keep sales at the restaurant low even after the new owners changed the things complained about in the negative review. Considering that the restaurant lost business after negative publicity, it only stands to reason that the restaurant would need to attract business using positive publicity. If the new owners neglected to inform customers of the positive changes, sales are not likely to increase.
  1. Since the new owners did dismiss most of the wait staff, the question of which members were the rudest is now irrelevant.
  2. This item is actually a reason that sales should have increased.
  3. This item correctly identifies a possible mistake made by the new owners. If negative publicity caused sales to fall, positive publicity – including information about a change in management – would be needed to help sales increase.
  4. This item is another reason sales should have increased after the new owners’ purchase.
  5. The other restaurant could present competition, but this item is not the best explanation for the lack of increase in sales.

Answer: C








Considering it is a 500 level question, I completely agree with the explanation given above.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2016, 04:22
Do not agree with the solution.. advertising about new management wont assure customer that food or service will be better,
rather advertising about new menu or better staff along with change in management would have helped, so I selected E, which is best option.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 10
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2016, 16:04
"A negative review of a popular restaurant claimed that the wait staff was rude and the food was overpriced. This review caused sales to drop precipitously which, in turn, forced the original owners to sell the business"

The only issue stated was the rude wait staff, which directly caused sales to drop due to the review. New management would not correct the problem, it only infers that they may be training employees differently. This feels like a weak answer.

I was left with option A since it had the most direct cause / effect relationship... If a few of the rudest employees remained, the problem remains.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Posts: 24
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2016, 19:02
Can anyone please explain why option A is incorrect?

Thanks
Akash
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Posts: 18
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2017, 01:24
Since this question asks both - [b]best basis[/b] for partial explanation, there can be multiple answers to this question. Maybe that the new owners tried their best to convey the msg that the ownership has changed, but a new restaurant took away partial business. For example, even if 20% of the business has gone to the new restaurant, the older one's sales could have remained stagnant. Alternatively, if the new owners began managing the restaurant when the sales are unusually high, it is very much possible that despite their best efforts at improving sales, either the sales remained flat or declined or increased marginally.

Can somebody throw some light?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Mar 2016
Posts: 5
CAT Tests
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 22:04
Hi,

Why can't B be the right answer? If the items are more affordable then even selling more number of items or having more customers could lead to only a smaller increase in sales.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 468
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2018, 13:03
1
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. E must be the answer

advertising can not justify high sales => until we assume that they advertised staff were humble.
so C is out


E on the other hand -> Since customers were already fed up with rude behaviour and price , which was high, so they started going in similar priced menu Restaurant ( atleast they would not see same rude persons face - indeed they can encounter new rude persons -> but since sales were dropped we can say -> they did not encounter rude persons ) => Loss to restaurant even after change in management .

E is winner => BINGO
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 48
Location: India
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V46
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.81
Reviews Badge
Re V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Feb 2018, 02:50
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. I think this is a poor quality question.

The negative review described the rudeness of the wait staff and the price of the food.

An advertisement showcasing the change in management does nothing to state that the wait staff is now polite or that the food is now priced fairly.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jun 2017
Posts: 12
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Re: V06-23  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2018, 02:56
sahilvijay wrote:
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. E must be the answer

advertising can not justify high sales => until we assume that they advertised staff were humble.
so C is out


E on the other hand -> Since customers were already fed up with rude behaviour and price , which was high, so they started going in similar priced menu Restaurant ( atleast they would not see same rude persons face - indeed they can encounter new rude persons -> but since sales were dropped we can say -> they did not encounter rude persons ) => Loss to restaurant even after change in management .

E is winner => BINGO


E is out of scope.

I believe A and C are toss ups. I picked A because it had more of a cause/effect relationship.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V06-23 &nbs [#permalink] 04 Mar 2018, 02:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V06-23

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel



Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.