Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 17:20 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 17:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vnbui
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 36
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rashminet84
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Last visit: 20 Aug 2010
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 111
Kudos: 243
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vannu
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Last visit: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Ross
Posts: 115
Kudos: 680
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tejal777
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Last visit: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Kolkata,India
Posts: 360
Kudos: 6,913
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I know the OA is A but I am heavily bent on E.Could smebody please clarify the reasons why E is wrong?
User avatar
ykaiim
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 519
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Posts: 519
Kudos: 5,901
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In A, it is mentioned that working closely with the public is a challenging aspects of serving on a city council.

Does it mean that only this case is applicable for small city and not for large cities?
I think it is a generalised case for all cities.

Experts please comment.
User avatar
ah64captain
Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Last visit: 18 Jan 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
am not an expert but seems to me:
(a) and (e) are both assumptions of the author,
(e) is somewhat implied by "Because city council members in small towns are intimately acquainted with the public they serve" (the oposite is implied) and (a) is a completely hidden assumption
also (e) is too extreme: "rarly" (the author could only assume "City council members in large cities engage the public directly less than small cities city council members do)
therefore (a) is better
not sure if that one would pass as an official GMAT explanation...
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets try negating the statements.

vnbui
Because city council members in small towns are intimately acquainted with the public they serve, they clearly have a more difficult job than city council members in larger cities.

The conclusion above rests on which of the following assumptions?

A, Working directly with members of the public is the one of the most challenging aspects of serving on a city council.

Negating this statement calls into question the entire premise of the argument. If a) is not assumed, then the argument falls apart. A is the correct choice.

B, Managing the affairs of a large city requires a more significant time commitment than working directly with the public.

Negating this statement supports the argument

C, City council members in small towns are often related to a certain percentage of the population, making them intimately acquainted with the people they serve.

Negating this statement does not affect the conclusion.
First, this says nothing about larger cities. Second, the premise does not rely on personal relationships.


D, Residents of small towns often attend city council meetings to present their concerns.

Negating this statement does not influence the conclusion. Even if residents of small towns rarely city council meetings, it says nothing about residents of larger cities.

E, City council members in large cities rarely engage the public directly.

Negating this statement does not violate the premise. This says nothing about members in smaller towns
User avatar
Practicegmat
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Last visit: 16 Dec 2014
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
Status:Time to apply!
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 94
Kudos: 539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Am also confused with (a) and (e)

If you negate (e) it becomes :
"City council members in large cities always engage the public directly" . That means the City council members in large cities also have a difficult job ahead.

Hence the conclusion "the city council members in small towns have a more difficult job than city council members in larger cities" falls apart . Both now have difficult job.No one has "more difficult" job.

Could anyone clarify why (a) suits better here than (e)?

Thanks
User avatar
Sudhanshuacharya
Joined: 31 May 2011
Last visit: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT Date: 12-07-2011
GPA: 3.22
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 49
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I know the OA is given as A, but still, i would prefer E.
Reason: "intimately acquainted" and "Working directly with members of the public" are two different things.
If we choose A, then the statement A assumes that only the city council members in small towns are working directly with members of public.

Now in case of option E "City council members in large cities rarely engage the public directly." This clarifies that even if the City council members in large cities are intimately acquainted with the public they serve they will have no issue because council members of large cities do not engage directly with public.
User avatar
prateekbhatt
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Last visit: 26 Jul 2019
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:My Thread Master Bschool Threads-->Krannert(Purdue),WP Carey(Arizona),Foster(Uwashngton)
Products:
Posts: 768
Kudos: 279
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Oh yeah will go with A...though was confused with the wordings...

A, Working directly with members of the public is the one of the most challenging aspects of serving on a city council

I guess it is not mentioned in the premise but assumption ques's are from family 2.
User avatar
kostyan5
Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Last visit: 27 Apr 2021
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 114
Kudos: 381
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The statement concludes that small city council has a more difficult job than a large city council. It says nothing about the difficulty of each. The assumption must be about the relative difficulty and not difficulty of any particular place.

In this case, we should be comparing small city council's involvement with public with that of the large city council.

E makes the best choice.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.
Where to now? Try our up-to-date Free Adaptive GMAT Club Tests for the latest questions.
Still interested? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for better discussion and related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
105390 posts