Last visit was: 03 May 2026, 13:38 It is currently 03 May 2026, 13:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 03 May 2026
Posts: 43,203
Own Kudos:
83,786
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,687
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,203
Kudos: 83,786
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 03 May 2026
Posts: 43,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,687
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,203
Kudos: 83,786
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
manlog
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Last visit: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 46
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,575
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manlog
bb, the passage gives information that the population declined, but in the explanation of the correct answer choice A and other choices, you say that "the size of the labor force has decreased.", which requires additional assumption, that "population decline = labour force decline".

Please refer to the slight change in wording in the first sentence of the passage.
avatar
SeregaP
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Last visit: 10 Feb 2018
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 80
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question, thank you!

I'm unsure if I get it right: "There have been no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force" doesn't this damage the whole argument? because if there was no increase in productivity, how then would GDP remained the same?

thank you
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,575
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SeregaP
Great question, thank you!

I'm unsure if I get it right: "There have been no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force" doesn't this damage the whole argument? because if there was no increase in productivity, how then would GDP remained the same?

thank you

Yes your understanding is correct - consider this way:

GDP ∝ Population x Productivity

If GDP is to remain same while population goes down, the productivity must go up.
avatar
victor123897
Joined: 15 Aug 2017
Last visit: 02 Feb 2018
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 7
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
SeregaP
Great question, thank you!

I'm unsure if I get it right: "There have been no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force" doesn't this damage the whole argument? because if there was no increase in productivity, how then would GDP remained the same?

thank you

Yes your understanding is correct - consider this way:

GDP ∝ Population x Productivity

If GDP is to remain same while population goes down, the productivity must go up.

Hi, Sayantanc2k

I am not sure I am understanding the explanation correctly. Could you please point to my misunderstanding?

If GDP = Labor*Productivity then, if Labor force has declined, the only possible explanation for GDP not declining is Productivity increasing. Alternatively, if there has been no productivity increase due to technological advances, then the GDP should be declining and resultantly since it "Has remained steady", this point WEAKENS the argument.
avatar
PuneetSinghAnand
Joined: 18 May 2019
Last visit: 04 Nov 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. If there "Have been" no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force then how will you justify the discrepancy in the question statement that the population decreased but GDP has remained steady.

Should that have been be something like "will be no more"
or "no more technological developments are expected"?
User avatar
Shlokzanwar
Joined: 21 Jul 2024
Last visit: 14 May 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Schools: Stanford (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V81 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 755 Q90 V88 DI84
GPA: 8.55
Schools: Stanford (S)
GMAT Focus 2: 755 Q90 V88 DI84
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PuneetSinghAnand
I think this is a high-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. If there "Have been" no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force then how will you justify the discrepancy in the question statement that the population decreased but GDP has remained steady.

Should that have been be something like "will be no more"
or "no more technological developments are expected"?
I agree with what you are saying. The right option answer should state that there will be no more technological advancement. Since the passage also isd talking about the future, the option that is correct should have the future reference.
For instance, there have been advancements in the past but what if one arises tomorrow?
The argument breaks down!

So I think the option choice should be changed to incorporate this aspect of the passage
bb please do let me know your thoughts
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 03 May 2026
Posts: 43,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,687
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,203
Kudos: 83,786
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you for pointing it out. I did not like the phrasing of the question too much either, so I have updated the answer choice and the grammar in the passage. As a thank you for the suggestion, I have provided you with a 2-week subscription to the tests.

Shlokzanwar
PuneetSinghAnand
I think this is a high-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. If there "Have been" no technological developments that would increase the productivity of the labor force then how will you justify the discrepancy in the question statement that the population decreased but GDP has remained steady.

Should that have been be something like "will be no more"
or "no more technological developments are expected"?
I agree with what you are saying. The right option answer should state that there will be no more technological advancement. Since the passage also isd talking about the future, the option that is correct should have the future reference.
For instance, there have been advancements in the past but what if one arises tomorrow?
The argument breaks down!

So I think the option choice should be changed to incorporate this aspect of the passage
bb please do let me know your thoughts
Moderators:
Math Expert
110029 posts
Founder
43202 posts