Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 1308:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 4 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we tackle the most intimidating CR question type: Boldface & "Legalese" questions. If you've ever stared at an answer choice that reads, "The first is a consideration introduced to counter a position that...- May 12
07:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the Live and learn more about Picking the Right Schools - May 14
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions.. - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
09 Feb 2025, 22:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage?
A. The author presents a problem, explores potential solutions, and concludes by endorsing one of them.
B. The author introduces a solution, discusses its possible drawbacks, and ends by weighing its overall viability.
C. The author outlines a debate, provides evidence supporting both sides, and then argues for a compromise.
D. The author describes a controversial idea, refutes it with opposing arguments, and dismisses it entirely.
E. The author starts with a critique, introduces a counterargument, and then supports the critique with additional evidence.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage?
A. The author presents a problem, explores potential solutions, and concludes by endorsing one of them.
B. The author introduces a solution, discusses its possible drawbacks, and ends by weighing its overall viability.
C. The author outlines a debate, provides evidence supporting both sides, and then argues for a compromise.
D. The author describes a controversial idea, refutes it with opposing arguments, and dismisses it entirely.
E. The author starts with a critique, introduces a counterargument, and then supports the critique with additional evidence.
09 Feb 2025, 22:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage?
A. The author presents a problem, explores potential solutions, and concludes by endorsing one of them.
B. The author introduces a solution, discusses its possible drawbacks, and ends by weighing its overall viability.
C. The author outlines a debate, provides evidence supporting both sides, and then argues for a compromise.
D. The author describes a controversial idea, refutes it with opposing arguments, and dismisses it entirely.
E. The author starts with a critique, introduces a counterargument, and then supports the critique with additional evidence.
A) Incorrect. The passage does not conclude by endorsing SRM as the definitive solution. Instead, it discusses the potential risks and emphasizes caution.
B) Correct Answer. The passage begins by introducing SRM as a possible solution to climate change, then explores the drawbacks, especially the moral hazard, and concludes by weighing SRM’s potential role in the broader climate strategy.
C) Incorrect. The passage does not present evidence supporting both sides of a debate or a compromise.
D) Incorrect. The author does not completely dismiss SRM. Instead, the passage acknowledges the benefits of SRM while expressing concerns about overreliance on it.
E) Incorrect. The passage does not follow a structure where an initial critique is supported by additional evidence.
Answer: B
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage?
A. The author presents a problem, explores potential solutions, and concludes by endorsing one of them.
B. The author introduces a solution, discusses its possible drawbacks, and ends by weighing its overall viability.
C. The author outlines a debate, provides evidence supporting both sides, and then argues for a compromise.
D. The author describes a controversial idea, refutes it with opposing arguments, and dismisses it entirely.
E. The author starts with a critique, introduces a counterargument, and then supports the critique with additional evidence.
A) Incorrect. The passage does not conclude by endorsing SRM as the definitive solution. Instead, it discusses the potential risks and emphasizes caution.
B) Correct Answer. The passage begins by introducing SRM as a possible solution to climate change, then explores the drawbacks, especially the moral hazard, and concludes by weighing SRM’s potential role in the broader climate strategy.
C) Incorrect. The passage does not present evidence supporting both sides of a debate or a compromise.
D) Incorrect. The author does not completely dismiss SRM. Instead, the passage acknowledges the benefits of SRM while expressing concerns about overreliance on it.
E) Incorrect. The passage does not follow a structure where an initial critique is supported by additional evidence.
Answer: B
09 Feb 2026, 07:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
bb I could not understand how option B is right. The author did not comment on the viability of the SRM technology. Please explain.
