Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
24 Jun 2025, 21:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
The passage most likely mentions the shogunate’s rule limiting gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai as evidence that
A. the samurai feared existing dress laws were losing their power to preserve clear class boundaries
B. luxury-textile production was intended to remain under samurai control rather than in commercial hands
C. cultural venues such as kabuki theater were a major driver of demand for opulent garments
D. the shogunate aimed to stop wealthy merchants specifically from dressing in ways that could challenge samurai prestige
E. the scarcity of deluxe materials required official rationing so they retained their symbolic value
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
The passage most likely mentions the shogunate’s rule limiting gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai as evidence that
A. the samurai feared existing dress laws were losing their power to preserve clear class boundaries
B. luxury-textile production was intended to remain under samurai control rather than in commercial hands
C. cultural venues such as kabuki theater were a major driver of demand for opulent garments
D. the shogunate aimed to stop wealthy merchants specifically from dressing in ways that could challenge samurai prestige
E. the scarcity of deluxe materials required official rationing so they retained their symbolic value
24 Jun 2025, 21:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
The passage most likely mentions the shogunate’s rule limiting gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai as evidence that
A. the samurai feared existing dress laws were losing their power to preserve clear class boundaries
B. luxury-textile production was intended to remain under samurai control rather than in commercial hands
C. cultural venues such as kabuki theater were a major driver of demand for opulent garments
D. the shogunate aimed to stop wealthy merchants specifically from dressing in ways that could challenge samurai prestige
E. the scarcity of deluxe materials required official rationing so they retained their symbolic value
A) Incorrect. Suggests samurai feared their existing dress rules were losing force, but the passage never claims earlier laws were failing; it simply shows the shogunate adding new limits to block merchants from imitating samurai.
B) Incorrect. Implies the laws sought to control who produced luxury textiles, whereas the passage makes clear the regulations targeted only who was allowed to wear such items.
C) Incorrect. Links the restrictions to demand from kabuki and other cultural events, yet the passage identifies merchants’ status-display, not cultural fashion trends, as the trigger for tightened rules.
D) Correct. Matches the passage’s point that the shogunate tightened dress codes specifically to prevent wealthy merchants from appearing equal to the samurai and thereby undermining the warrior class’s prestige.
E) Incorrect. Attributes the laws to scarcity management, but the passage frames them as tools for preserving exclusivity and hierarchy, not rationing limited resources.
Answer: D
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
The passage most likely mentions the shogunate’s rule limiting gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai as evidence that
A. the samurai feared existing dress laws were losing their power to preserve clear class boundaries
B. luxury-textile production was intended to remain under samurai control rather than in commercial hands
C. cultural venues such as kabuki theater were a major driver of demand for opulent garments
D. the shogunate aimed to stop wealthy merchants specifically from dressing in ways that could challenge samurai prestige
E. the scarcity of deluxe materials required official rationing so they retained their symbolic value
A) Incorrect. Suggests samurai feared their existing dress rules were losing force, but the passage never claims earlier laws were failing; it simply shows the shogunate adding new limits to block merchants from imitating samurai.
B) Incorrect. Implies the laws sought to control who produced luxury textiles, whereas the passage makes clear the regulations targeted only who was allowed to wear such items.
C) Incorrect. Links the restrictions to demand from kabuki and other cultural events, yet the passage identifies merchants’ status-display, not cultural fashion trends, as the trigger for tightened rules.
D) Correct. Matches the passage’s point that the shogunate tightened dress codes specifically to prevent wealthy merchants from appearing equal to the samurai and thereby undermining the warrior class’s prestige.
E) Incorrect. Attributes the laws to scarcity management, but the passage frames them as tools for preserving exclusivity and hierarchy, not rationing limited resources.
Answer: D
11 Apr 2026, 22:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Why is option A wrong here? I understand D is also very close in fact both A and D are very close, but the answer says "Suggests samurai feared their existing dress rules were losing force, but the passage never claims earlier laws were failing". But here option A also never claims that earlier laws were failing, it simply says that they feared the potential loss of power and which eventually led them to add new limits to block access to merchants, which again is exactly what is suggested in answer as well. Kindly help me out.
bb
