Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
24 Jan 2025, 02:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
New regulations mandating higher nutrition standards for school meals were introduced with the dual goals of improving children’s overall health and reducing obesity rates. These regulations required that the meals offer a greater variety of foods, including options with lower calorie content, with the ultimate aim of reducing childhood obesity. However, despite implementing these changes, and the fact that many students now purchase their lunches at school, there has not been a noticeable decrease in obesity rates among school-aged children.
Which of the following would, if true, best explain the discrepancy outlined above?
A. Before the new regulations were implemented, most school meals met the nutritional guidelines that were in place at that time.
B. Many students dislike the taste of the healthier entrées and discard them, consuming only small portions of the recommended items.
C. The new regulations mandate that all school cafeterias implement menus in multiple languages.
D. Many schools have expressed concerns with the introduction of new regulations.
E. The increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose healthier options.
Which of the following would, if true, best explain the discrepancy outlined above?
A. Before the new regulations were implemented, most school meals met the nutritional guidelines that were in place at that time.
B. Many students dislike the taste of the healthier entrées and discard them, consuming only small portions of the recommended items.
C. The new regulations mandate that all school cafeterias implement menus in multiple languages.
D. Many schools have expressed concerns with the introduction of new regulations.
E. The increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose healthier options.
24 Jan 2025, 02:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
New regulations mandating higher nutrition standards for school meals were introduced with the dual goals of improving children’s overall health and reducing obesity rates. These regulations required that the meals offer a greater variety of foods, including options with lower calorie content, with the ultimate aim of reducing childhood obesity. However, despite implementing these changes, and the fact that many students now purchase their lunches at school, there has not been a noticeable decrease in obesity rates among school-aged children.
Which of the following would, if true, best explain the discrepancy outlined above?
A. Before the new regulations were implemented, most school meals met the nutritional guidelines that were in place at that time.
B. Many students dislike the taste of the healthier entrées and discard them, consuming only small portions of the recommended items.
C. The new regulations mandate that all school cafeterias implement menus in multiple languages.
D. Many schools have expressed concerns with the introduction of new regulations.
E. The increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose healthier options.
(A) Incorrect: this answer choice does not explain why there was no decrease in obesity rates following the regulations, since the regulations improved nutritional standards.
(B) Incorrect: If students truly ate less at lunch (i.e., discarding food), that could lower total caloric intake—potentially helping with obesity, not worsening it (unless they compensate outside school, but that’s not stated, and we should not bring external assumptions in a correct answer choice).
(C) Incorrect: Irrelevant - the language of the menus would not help explain the discrepancy. If anything, this should have made the menus more relevant to some of the bilingual students.
(D) Incorrect: Schools expressing concerns about the new regulations is not relevant to our augment. As long as the schools are following the regulations, it does not matter if they are concerned or not concerned. Perhaps concerns were about nutrition or perhaps change or perhaps financial concerns - we are not given the context and can't really evaluate this statement properly in its current vague form so it is safe to eliminate it.
(E) Correct: This choice demonstrates a potentially unintended consequence of the new standards, which would undermine their effectiveness looking to reduce obesity. Menu complexity could prevent students from eating healthy and thus would not reduce obesity rates, as students choose higher-calorie options.
Answer: E
New regulations mandating higher nutrition standards for school meals were introduced with the dual goals of improving children’s overall health and reducing obesity rates. These regulations required that the meals offer a greater variety of foods, including options with lower calorie content, with the ultimate aim of reducing childhood obesity. However, despite implementing these changes, and the fact that many students now purchase their lunches at school, there has not been a noticeable decrease in obesity rates among school-aged children.
Which of the following would, if true, best explain the discrepancy outlined above?
A. Before the new regulations were implemented, most school meals met the nutritional guidelines that were in place at that time.
B. Many students dislike the taste of the healthier entrées and discard them, consuming only small portions of the recommended items.
C. The new regulations mandate that all school cafeterias implement menus in multiple languages.
D. Many schools have expressed concerns with the introduction of new regulations.
E. The increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose healthier options.
(A) Incorrect: this answer choice does not explain why there was no decrease in obesity rates following the regulations, since the regulations improved nutritional standards.
(B) Incorrect: If students truly ate less at lunch (i.e., discarding food), that could lower total caloric intake—potentially helping with obesity, not worsening it (unless they compensate outside school, but that’s not stated, and we should not bring external assumptions in a correct answer choice).
(C) Incorrect: Irrelevant - the language of the menus would not help explain the discrepancy. If anything, this should have made the menus more relevant to some of the bilingual students.
(D) Incorrect: Schools expressing concerns about the new regulations is not relevant to our augment. As long as the schools are following the regulations, it does not matter if they are concerned or not concerned. Perhaps concerns were about nutrition or perhaps change or perhaps financial concerns - we are not given the context and can't really evaluate this statement properly in its current vague form so it is safe to eliminate it.
(E) Correct: This choice demonstrates a potentially unintended consequence of the new standards, which would undermine their effectiveness looking to reduce obesity. Menu complexity could prevent students from eating healthy and thus would not reduce obesity rates, as students choose higher-calorie options.
Answer: E
20 Sep 2025, 23:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
I did not quite understand the solution. Reasoning for option 2 -
When students are disliking the taste of newly implemented menu, they will look for alternative and/or consume only little food from what is in the menu. This will make them not feel satiated (assumption) and they will go towards purchasing lunch during school time.
I think it fits well in this chronology with the passage. Tell me where is this going wrong.
Reasoning against option 4 -
Increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose - even if they don't consistently choose the items, they will still be doing it some of the times while eating according to the new guideline. It is like saying, earlier it was 7+7+7+7+7 in a week, now it is 7+4+7+6+7
they are not consistently meeting the same lower count, but still it is lower than the former, so it is decreasing the calorie count, hence obesity over time to some level.
tell me where i am wrong with my reasonings.
When students are disliking the taste of newly implemented menu, they will look for alternative and/or consume only little food from what is in the menu. This will make them not feel satiated (assumption) and they will go towards purchasing lunch during school time.
I think it fits well in this chronology with the passage. Tell me where is this going wrong.
Reasoning against option 4 -
Increase in food variety makes it harder for students to consistently choose - even if they don't consistently choose the items, they will still be doing it some of the times while eating according to the new guideline. It is like saying, earlier it was 7+7+7+7+7 in a week, now it is 7+4+7+6+7
they are not consistently meeting the same lower count, but still it is lower than the former, so it is decreasing the calorie count, hence obesity over time to some level.
tell me where i am wrong with my reasonings.
