Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 07:47 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 07:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
53,096
 [13]
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 53,096
 [13]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,946
 [5]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,946
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
winionhi
Joined: 24 Dec 2015
Last visit: 25 Sep 2017
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 49
Kudos: 33
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stampap
Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Erasmus '18
Schools: Erasmus '18
Posts: 10
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Pacific Ocean was once much higher at certain points over the last 500,000 years than it is today.
Since the conclusion says that it was even lower , then we need the waters to be higher

E
avatar
Hellohello12
Joined: 30 May 2017
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 6
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My initial instinct was answer E. However, D is superior for two reasons.
1) E contradicts the stem. E says the ocean was "once much higher than it is today."
The stem says, ocean levels were "much lower during the ice ages."
Therefore, for the exposed crust to have been 500 feet below the surface, it must have been lower.

2) The question is talking about oceans in general. Option E discusses the Pacific Ocean, out of scope.
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 273
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990
Layers of the earth’s crust are exposed at several points along California’s San Andreas Fault. Notably, a team of geologists recently spotted a remote fold of exposed crust along the fault that contained shells of a species of mollusk from 500,000 years ago that can only survive at least 500 feet below the surface of the ocean. The exposed crust is comprised of the same sediment consistent with the known habitat of the mollusk. Surprisingly, however, ocean levels have generally been lower than they are now and were much lower during the great ice ages.
 
The information above most strongly supports which one of the following?
 
Ⓐ The Pacific Ocean today contains fewer living specimens of the mollusks unearthed at the fault.

Ⓑ There are other habitats that these mollusks can survive in other than at 500 feet or more below the ocean’s surface.

Ⓒ The geologists on the team were the first people to see the fold of exposed crust.

Ⓓ The exposed crust was once lower than it is today.

Ⓔ The Pacific Ocean was once much higher at certain points over the last 500,000 years than it is today.


Argument

Geo's spotted fold of remote crust that contains 500,000 year old mollusk. M's can only survive 500 feet below the ocean.
Exposed crust sediments = M's known habitat
Oceans levels lower than now, and were even lower before.

=> For M's to be found in that exposed crust points to the fact that the crust would have been deeper underground at some point in the past.

A - Out. Nothing in the passage mentions about the number of organisms.
B - Out. The passage states the ONLY known habitat is 500 feet below the ocean. This directly contradicts a fact stated in the argument.
C - Out. This is irrelevant. If the geo's weren't the first to see it, the M's are still there => the crust would have been 500 below the ocean surface at some point.
D - Keep.
E - Trick Option. Out. The passage directly states that the ocean levels are much lower than today, and were even lower before, during the ice age. We'd have to make an assumption i.e. the water levels were higher before the ice age, but that's beyond the scope of this argument.

D is the answer by POE.
User avatar
Leo8
Joined: 23 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Sep 2020
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE:Programming (Energy)
Posts: 184
Kudos: 390
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Layers of the earth’s crust are exposed at several points along California’s San Andreas Fault. Notably, a team of geologists recently spotted a remote fold of exposed crust along the fault that contained shells of a species of mollusk from 500,000 years ago that can only survive at least 500 feet below the surface of the ocean. The exposed crust is comprised of the same sediment consistent with the known habitat of the mollusk. Surprisingly, however, ocean levels have generally been lower than they are now and were much lower during the great ice ages.


The passage discusses the habitat of the Mollusk that was supposed to be 500 feet below the sea level, and scientists have now found the shells of mollusk at the crust of the earth. How is this possible?


The information above most strongly supports which one of the following?

Ⓐ The Pacific Ocean today contains fewer living specimens of the mollusks unearthed at the fault. No Argument is speaking about the habitat of the Mollusk

Ⓑ There are other habitats that these mollusks can survive in other than at 500 feet or more below the ocean’s surface. Fails the Fact test. Premise tells us Mollusk had only one habitat

Ⓒ The geologists on the team were the first people to see the fold of exposed crust. But will it explain how Mollusk shells were found?

Ⓓ The exposed crust was once lower than it is today. Yes This can be the plausible explanation of the presence of the shells

Ⓔ The Pacific Ocean was once much higher at certain points over the last 500,000 years than it is today.It fails the fact test, levels of Oceans were far lower in past than today
User avatar
yath0307
Joined: 15 Apr 2025
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
winionhi
I believe the answer is E. Only if the Pacific Ocean was higher than it is today, it could have facilitated the Mollusks to inhabit the area.
hey buddy, option A cannot be the answer as premises talks about 'oceans' in general but not pacific ocean specifically
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts