Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 0710:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 745+ score.
Aug 1112:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
- Know exactly what to study, every day - Built by the GMAT Club community - 100% free, no sign-up needed
Aug 1410:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Top Scores Start with a Elite Online Prep Course. Enroll for 6 months of access to over 400 hours of GMAT video lessons AND 715+ Score Guarantee!- Aug 15
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 15th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST - Aug 18
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Strong applicants do not always write strong MBA essays. In this session, we break down 5 common MBA essay mistakes that can quietly weaken an otherwise competitive application. These are not beginner mistakes .... - Aug 18
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Is GMAT Quant really a math test? Many test takers approach GMAT Quant with one of two beliefs: either “I’m not a math person, so I’ll struggle,” or “I’m good at math, so Quant should be easy.” But the GMAT often surprises both groups. 
Aug 2210:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays August 22, 2026 - Nov. 14, 2026, 10:00am-1:00pm EST
23 Jul 2026, 23:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi everyone,
I recently took the GMAT Focus Edition and scored 605. While I'm reasonably satisfied with the overall score, I believe my biggest weakness continues to be Reading Comprehension and Critical Reasoning.
The frustrating part is that I've actually spent a significant amount of time practicing both sections. I've gone through official questions, reviewed explanations, maintained error logs, and tried various strategies. Despite all that, I still find myself getting stuck between two answer choices and often selecting the wrong one.
A few observations about my performance:
For those who significantly improved their RC/CR performance, I'd love your advice:
Any insights, frameworks, or study approaches would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
I recently took the GMAT Focus Edition and scored 605. While I'm reasonably satisfied with the overall score, I believe my biggest weakness continues to be Reading Comprehension and Critical Reasoning.
The frustrating part is that I've actually spent a significant amount of time practicing both sections. I've gone through official questions, reviewed explanations, maintained error logs, and tried various strategies. Despite all that, I still find myself getting stuck between two answer choices and often selecting the wrong one.
A few observations about my performance:
- In RC, I generally understand the passage and its main idea.
- However, many answer choices seem equally plausible, and I struggle to identify the subtle distinction that makes one clearly correct.
- In CR, I usually understand the argument, conclusion, and evidence.
- My mistakes often occur when two choices appear reasonable, and I cannot confidently eliminate one.
- During review, the correct answer frequently looks obvious in hindsight, which makes me wonder whether my issue is strategy rather than comprehension.
For those who significantly improved their RC/CR performance, I'd love your advice:
- What helped you move from being "often confused between two options" to consistently picking the correct answer?
- Did you focus more on understanding the passage/argument or on analyzing answer choices?
- Are there any specific drills that improved answer-choice discrimination?
- Did you notice any recurring patterns in wrong answers that helped you improve?
- How did you review RC and CR mistakes effectively?
Any insights, frameworks, or study approaches would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
24 Jul 2026, 06:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
The plateau you're on is a common one, so don't take the misses as a sign it isn't paying off. The useful tell is that the answer looks obvious when you review it. That points to where the trouble sits: the final call between the last two choices, made under real conditions.
That two-answer problem is almost always about precision. When you understand a passage or argument at the level of the main idea, two choices can both feel consistent with it. What separates them is finer: the exact scope of a claim, which idea belongs to whom, the precise thing the question is asking the answer to do. So comprehension and answer analysis really work as one thing. Reading more precisely is what lets you cut a choice with confidence.
The drill that builds this: on every question, don't just pick. Make yourself say in a sentence why each wrong choice is wrong and what specific text or logic backs the right one. "Feels off" doesn't count. "This ties the second scientist's view to the first" does. When you're down to two, write the one difference between them before you choose.
For CR, get the exact conclusion and what the question type demands, then test each choice on its own: does it do that job? Plenty of tempting wrong answers are true, or related to the argument, but don't do the job. If you're building a story to justify a choice, that's usually the trap.
For RC, go back and find the line that proves one choice and kills the other. If you can't point to the text, it isn't the answer, however reasonable it reads. Watch the usual traps: mixing up who said what, a comparison the passage never makes, a choice that reaches past what's there.
You already keep an error log, so log the trap type and why the wrong choice pulled you, not just that you missed. You'll find the same two or three traps behind most of your errors.
More on the answer-choice side here: GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Tips.
That two-answer problem is almost always about precision. When you understand a passage or argument at the level of the main idea, two choices can both feel consistent with it. What separates them is finer: the exact scope of a claim, which idea belongs to whom, the precise thing the question is asking the answer to do. So comprehension and answer analysis really work as one thing. Reading more precisely is what lets you cut a choice with confidence.
The drill that builds this: on every question, don't just pick. Make yourself say in a sentence why each wrong choice is wrong and what specific text or logic backs the right one. "Feels off" doesn't count. "This ties the second scientist's view to the first" does. When you're down to two, write the one difference between them before you choose.
For CR, get the exact conclusion and what the question type demands, then test each choice on its own: does it do that job? Plenty of tempting wrong answers are true, or related to the argument, but don't do the job. If you're building a story to justify a choice, that's usually the trap.
For RC, go back and find the line that proves one choice and kills the other. If you can't point to the text, it isn't the answer, however reasonable it reads. Watch the usual traps: mixing up who said what, a comparison the passage never makes, a choice that reaches past what's there.
You already keep an error log, so log the trap type and why the wrong choice pulled you, not just that you missed. You'll find the same two or three traps behind most of your errors.
More on the answer-choice side here: GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Tips.
LoyalRing
24 Jul 2026, 06:51
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thank you, this was actually helpful!
ScottTargetTestPrep
