Reading some of these other evaluations is a little discouraging, but I'm not shooting for the top tier, and I want to know if I have a shot.
I'm a little concerned that I'm at a demographic disadvantage, which is compounded by my lack of direction/experience at my age.
I'm a white male, 30, in NYC. My GMAT was 660 (Q:44, v:37), undergrad GPA of 3.5 cumulative and in Economics major at Rutgers.
My work history started well, and has kind of slid around since then. I started in customer service at Datek (old online brokerage). I quickly moved to management and stayed there for two years, but still just in customer service. After the bubble burst, I took the layoff package and moved to a market making company, but only stayed for 10 months (loathed my "boss" and the environment, not to mention did not see a future). Then I started trading for my own account at a prop trading firm in NYC, and quickly moved to the position of Head Trader. I was involved in a lot of strategy meetings with investors and such as well as running the daily functions of the desk AND still trading my own account full time. I was recruited away to do the same thing for a friend's trading company, and ran his desk for a year. However, this is right when algos and other programs had achieved over an 80% hold on the market, and my group could no longer make a real living, so I through in the towel. I currently work at Nasdaq in trade support. It's essentially entry level again, and I hate it, but will stick it out until I go to school to try to bring some stability to my resume.
So, my schools of choice are Texas McCombs and UNC Kenan-Flagler.
Do I have a shot?
Is my age/experience a real problem? I know that I can take the GMAT again, but I think that a 660 is probably about the same as a 700. If I really need the 700, I will take the dang test again, but I don't really want to.