In the decades following World War II, American business had undispute

Question

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980s.

The first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.

Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace. These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies.

Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a product‘s total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers‘ wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.

The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products. Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods. American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach.

The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quick
to exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities   1 1. The passage suggests that compared to Japanese workers, American workers are often considered:

A. more content and more efficient.
B. more content but less efficient.
C. less content and less efficient.
D. less content but more efficient.
E. lazy and less hard working

2 
2. With which of the following general statements would the author most likely NOT agree?

A. American business has been hurt by the inability to plan for the long-term.
B. Cutting production costs always leads to increased competitiveness.
C. American consumers are not the prime cause of the decline of American business.
D. Initial analysis of the decline of American business yielded only partially accurate conclusions.
E. Mergers and Acquisitions have not helped improve the situation

3 
3. Which of the following would most weaken the author‘s argument about the over-concentration on high technology products?

A. Producing low tech products is not as profitable as producing high tech products.
B. Manufacturing high tech products is a completely different process than manufacturing low tech goods.
C. Most of the low tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.
D. Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.
E. Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by American firms.

4 
4. The author of this passage would probably give his greatest support to which of the following actions by the corporate management of an American company?

A. Acquiring a smaller company in order to gain financial resources
B. Considering the option of paying the most highly skilled workers a higher wage
C. Trying to learn from the general management strategy of foreign firms
D. Paying for television advertisements that will win back American consumers
E. Flooding foreign markets with cheap goods

commdiver · Accepted Answer

1. C. The answer to this question can be found in the third paragraph. It mentions "citing labour demands and poor productivity". One can infer from this that US workers are not content (which is why they would make demands) and inefficient (inefficient=poor productivity).

2. B. A is incorrect because of the last paragraph where it mentions how the US has focused only on the short term. C is incorrect because of the third paragraph. Several analysts blamed US consumers. Because the author mentioned this, one can infer that he would argue it. D and E are also incorrect. The author actually explicitly argues E in the last paragraph.

3. B. The author's argument relies on the assumption that to manufacture high-tech products requires the abandonment of manufacturing low-tech products. Saying that it does not weakens the argument.

4. C. This one is pretty easy. The author spends the entire passage talking about how foreign firms have no made the same mistakes as their American counterparts.

I hope that helps

auradediligodo · Answer

Hi,
took 13 minutes and got3/4 correct. took 6 minutes to read the passage, write down paragraphs summaries and main point.

P1 Present a phenomenon: the decline of american business after ww2
P2: 2 possible reasons for the decline: government and raiders
P3: Present another possible reason along with the actual reason: corporate management
P4: A wrong measure taken for solving the situation
P5: A case in which a foreign strategy was successful 
P6: CM&A are two other causes of the AB decline

MP: to discuss the reasons initially thought to be responsible for a situation along with the real reasons for it.

1.  The passage suggests that compared to Japanese workers, American workers are often considered:

Pre-Thinking:  refer to the first line of P3: "Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing  labour demands and poor productivity  as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms." From this we can infer #less-efficient and #less-content.
Now Even tough it is not clearly written that the us labor force was less satisfied than the Japanese one we can infer it through the association of satisfaction with higher productivity. 
 
A. more content and more efficient.  incorrect 
B. more content but less efficient.  less content actually. Incorrect 
C. less content and less efficient.  yes, correct as in line with our pre-thinking 
D. less content but more efficient.  not more efficient. hence incorrect 
E. lazy and less hard working  nowhere we can infer lazy from the passage. Hence incorrect

2.  With which of the following general statements would the author most likely NOT agree?

Pre-thinking:  Since we can not make much reasoning out of the question statement we need to evaluate the single answer choices

A. American business has been hurt by the inability to plan for the long-term.  Refer to the last paragraph and especially to."While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production". Hence incorrect 
B. Cutting production costs always leads to increased competitiveness.  The problem here is the always which makes it not in line with the author's reasoning. Although the author is not in favor with the cost cutting techniques he says that they are responsible for a percentage of the problems. 
C. American consumers are not the prime cause of the decline of American business.  Refer to paragraph 3. "Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods." The author tone clearly disagrees with the analysts view. Hence incorrect 
D. Initial analysis of the decline of American business yielded only partially accurate conclusions.  In the first paragraphs there are possible explanations which are not really the main reason for the crisis. Hence incorrect 
E. Mergers and Acquisitions have not helped improve the situation  As per the last paragraph. Hence incorrect.

3.  Which of the following would most weaken the author‘s argument about the over-concentration on high technology products?

Pre Thinking:  refer to the 5th paragraph and focus on the author reasoning. The author says that companies FIRSTLY have experience in making low quality products on a large scale, SECONDLY they make huge profits and THIRDLY they use both experience and profits to manufacture high technological products.
Now to recap: Plan: 1&2
 Goal: 3
You can now clearly weaken the argument by saying that either the gained experience is useless or that the huge profits are not enough (or both!) 
 
A. Producing low tech products is not as profitable as producing high tech products.  irrelevant. It may not be as profitable but it could be enough profitable to start 
B. Manufacturing high tech products is a completely different process than manufacturing low tech goods.  This suggests that the experience gained is useless and it weakens the argument. Correct 
C. Most of the low tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.  irrelevant since it does not relate to the entities discussed in our prethinking 
D. Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.   same as for the previous answer choice 
E. Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by American firms.  irrelevant again since 1&2 are not discussed

4.  The author of this passage would probably give his greatest support to which of the following actions by the corporate management of an American company?

Prethinking:  you can actually focus on more paragraphs here. I would suggest to keep in mind which are the useful measures mentioned in the passage but as well the useless measures described. These last ones could be turned into the correct answer choice.

A. Acquiring a smaller company in order to gain financial resources  Nowhere it is written that this could e beneficial. Hence incorrect 
B. Considering the option of paying the most highly skilled workers a higher wage   This is tempting but it is incorrect. The reason is because wages are discussed in a general way for everyone and highly skilled operators make up only for a portion of them. Plus it would be unfair to increase the salary only of this category in order to retain it. 
C. Trying to learn from the general management strategy of foreign firms  Yes. Take the example mentioned in the 5th paragraph 
D. Paying for television advertisements that will win back American consumers  Nowhere mentioned. Hence incorrect 
E. Flooding foreign markets with cheap goods  Again not mentioned as a technique. Incorrect

kanthaliya · Answer

Hi Experts,

Please throw some light on the answer of question 3: I am not able to understand the answer.

BigAdam · Answer

What is it w/ 4B? Why is that considered wrong?!

regards

Gmatsaiyan · Answer

Topic & Scope  - American business lags behind the competition because management has alienated workers, concentrated on high tech products, and neglected long-range planning.
 Mapping the Passage 
¶1 outlines the decline of American business
¶s2 and 3 list reasons that analysts have given for the decline and introduce the author‘s own theory for American business problems: incompetent management.
¶4 lists management‘s problems with labour.
¶5 explains the problem with America's fixation on high-tech products.
¶6 uses mergers to show that corporations lack long-range planning.
Strategy Points: Some passages will consist of a “laundry list” of recommendations, criticisms, or facts, with very little competing opinion. Work efficiently through the passage to identify the main ideas, knowing that much of the time will be spent on the questions.

Gmatsaiyan · Answer

Answers and Explanations OE  1) A quick scan of the answer choices shows that you have to compare the workers of the two nations on two criteria: contentedness and efficiency. Search for a part of
the passage that touches on this. ¶3 is the only one that cites Japan, and mentions that analysts consider American workers less productive and less content. (C) it is.
(A): Opposite. They‘re neither.
(B): Opposite. Latter, but not former.
(C): The Correct answer
(D): Opposite. Former, but not latter.
(E): The passage doesn‘t mention these anywhere
 2) An inference question; make sure that you‘re clear on the main points of the author‘s argument. Remember that the author will agree with four, but will disagree with the correct answer. The three wrong answers could be easily eliminated, leading to (B). However, you can also reason that since management has suffered by cutting labour costs, cost-cutting doesn‘t always result in lowered prices.
(A): Opposite. The author does believe this (¶6).
(B): The correct answer
(C): Opposite. The author only briefly mentions that "a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods" but then says that the real blame "lies with corporate management" (¶3). Therefore the author agrees.
(D): Opposite. This is the focus of ¶s2 and 3
(E): Opposite. This is mentioned in lines 41-42
 3) Paraphrase the author‘s argument about high technology: it‘s better to start out with low-tech, get experience, and then ramp up to high-tech. Search the answer choices for something that would contradict this. (B) clearly does; if the processes are completely different, why start with low-tech.
(A): Out of Scope. While this is quite possibly true, it wouldn‘t affect the author‘s chain of reasoning.
(B): The Correct Answer
(C): Out of Scope. Again, though it might be true, it doesn‘t harm the author‘s argument.
(D): Opposite. This strengthens the idea that starting out low-tech makes the hightech business easier.
(E): Out of scope
 4) We‘re looking for a business action that would presumably fix one or more of the problems that the author sees in American business. While (C) offers no detailed prescriptions; we know that the author believes foreign models of management to be superior. If American business followed their lead, the author would probably
give his support.
(A): Opposite. The author attacks this strategy in ¶6.
(B): Distortion. The author does argue that businesses should stop trying to minimize wages, but says nothing about wage fairness between groups of workers, only wage fairness as a whole. In fact, the author would probably say that more money should be funnelled to lower-skilled workers making low-tech products.
(C): The correct answer
(D): Out of Scope. There‘s nothing to suggest that the author would agree with this strategy, especially given the fact that he considers the American business model rotten at the core. Simple advertising won‘t cut it.
(E): Out of scope

srravii · Answer

Hello,

Please go through this segment of the passage, you'll get the answer why option B is wrong.
""Management has been quick to blame the costs of workers‘ wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.""

A. · Answer

I am not sure why in Question 3, B is the correct option? option B is opposite of what is mentioned in the passage. Like it is mentioned experience gained in production of low tech products will be used for high tech products. But the option B claims info mentioned in the passage to be false. We should NOT chose the option that negates the info in the passage. Weakens option should provide new info as well as should weaken the argument

Harsh_Belani · Answer

bb  I think the questions and options are misaligned. Look into it.

Bunuel · Answer

_______________
Fixed. Is now OK?

sayan640 · Answer

MartyMurray   KarishmaB ,
Regarding the question 4 , which line in the passage mentions "Trying to learn from the general management strategy of foreign firms" ?
Can you please explain why the answer is B ?

Wakanda · Answer

Question number 3,4 answer explanationn
why option E is not correct in Q3. and why option E is not correct for Q4

Ilanchezhiyan · Answer

The foreign companies were successful in producing high tech products did so because, they used their previous experience in producing low tech. products. The author criticizes American companies for not following this simple approach .

One way to weaken this argument is by saying that the previous experience is itself not useful as it is a completely different process, which is what B says.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

In the decades following World War II, American business had undispute

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

In the decades following World War II, American business had undispute

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards