Answers are in
bold.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) examine Blanchard’s fictional world for clues that could reveal his criminal past.
(B) clarify certain aspects of Blanchard’s biography.
(C) reject Blanchard’s critical reception as unappreciative of his creative genius.(D) correct a common misconception regarding the work of a famous playwright.
(E) defend a playwright against accusations that may be factually incorrect
Explanation of question 1A - Well that was what others do. This is a trap answer. But author does not agree with the others. He thinks Blanchard's work is praiseworthy.
B - No clarification is going on here.
C - This is the primary purpose. Author thinks Blanchard was a creative genius, but his past life always comes in the way. Hence the world, rather than appreciating his work, tries to pass moral judgement.
D - If you are thinking the misconception is that Blanchard's work had reference to his past crimes, then no this is not a misconception. All the author is trying to do is defend the brilliance of his works. The author does not attempt to defend Blanchard as an individual.
E - author is not trying to defend Blanchard. He is only trying to defend Blanchard's work, which he thinks is of substance.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Which one of the following summarizes the main point of the passage?
(A) By judging Andrew Blanchard’s personal life rather than the quality of his work, critics fail to accord him the appreciation he deserves.(B) Some of the themes that inhabit Andrew Blanchard’s fictional world are drawn from his criminal past.
(C) Mark Newman’s biography of Andrew Blanchard is well-informed, but the judgments it reaches are overly harsh.
(D) Andrew Blanchard’s fictional world provides a valuable insight into his personal life.
(E) Andrew Blanchard’s moral failings have prevented him from reaching his true artistic potential.
Explanation of question 2A - Absolutely. The essence of the passage is very subtly written in this line -
"..they all share a certain smugness that prevents them from appreciating the poetic brilliance of their objet de critique." Object of criticism is Blanchard's poetic brilliance (according to author). But his past criminal records malign his brilliance, and that is what the author is trying to convey.
B - This may well be true, but it is not the main point of the passage.
C - This passage is not about Newman. Newman is a tool, an example, which the author uses to show how the works of Blanchard has been criticized.
D - May be. May not be. A lot of people have tried to uncover this, but nothing can be said about this with absolute certainty.
E - This is a close choice, but not the answer because of one key point. Although the author believes that Blanchard is a good artist, it is never mentioned if anything PREVENTED him from REACHING HIS BEST. Therefore, this may well be true, but is not discussed in the passage and hence cannot be the main idea.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. The author most likely uses the phrase “fictional world” (line 6) to refer to
(A) a body of work produced by an artist
(B) a true belief that something is objectively false
(C) an artistic concept
(D) a potentially deceptive work
(E) a body of work that has no relation to its author’s real lifeExplanation of question 3Two choices come close A and E
Fictional work in general means imaginary work, not related to the real world.
A - true it is a body of work produced by the author. But why does he use the word FICTIONAL. It could have been just world then.
C - In this choice the problem of A is dealt with. it now clearly means that it is imaginary work, which has no relation to the author's real life.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. It can be inferred from the passage that Mark Newman would be most likely to agree with each one of the following statements about the work of Andrew Blanchard, EXCEPT:
(A) It is written by someone with a criminal past.
(B) It is not the product of a highly skilled dramaturge.
(C) It requires correction and clarification.
(D) It can be offensive as well as incoherent.
(E) It makes an unsuccessful attempt at meta-theater.Explanation of question 4EXCEPT question, so we need to find the odd one out. With 4 choices Newman would agree.
A - Newman wants to expose Blanchard as a petty thief. So he believes he has a criminal past.
B - The last line suggests Newman believes this -
"The implication being, of course, that Blanchard was far from being a skilled dramaturge."C - Stated here -
"In his book, Newman undertakes the formidable challenge of correcting and clarifying certain aspects of Blanchard’s biography."D - Stated here -
"Blanchard’s plays as disturbing, distasteful, even disgusting.".
Incoherent because is stated here -
"arguing that only a highly skilled dramaturge can interweave multiple plays- within-a-play and still maintain a coherent narrative structure."E - So this is the odd one out. The meaning is distorted in this choice. Lets see what is stated in the passage -
"He even dislikes the playwright’s penchant for meta-theater" Newman dislikes Blanchard's liking for narrative stucture. But this does not mean it makes an unsuccessful ATTEMPT at meta-theatre.