To all whom it may concern, i am posting official analysis and explanation of the passage, if you still have any doubt kindly let me know.
Official Explanation
Analysis:
The passage outlines the critical reception of Andrew Blanchard’s work, elaborating on a particularly unfavorable critical view.
Paragraph One:
In the first paragraph, we learn that Andrew Blanchard is a writer with a criminal past, which seems to bear some resemblance to the subject matter of his work. We also learn that Blanchard’s scholars use his fictional world to find clues about his life. Most importantly, the first paragraph provides an insight into the author’s own views regarding Blanchard and his critical reception: the judgmental attitude shared by his critics has prevented them from appreciating the “poetic brilliance” of Andrew Blanchard.
Paragraph Two:
This paragraph provides an example of a particularly negative critical view of Blanchard and his work. Mark Newman regards Blanchard as a thief as well as a bad playwright, and seems particularly bothered by the latter’s penchant for meta-theater. While “metatheater” is not explicitly defined here, you can infer that—in its ideal form—it interweaves multiple plays-within-a-play and still maintains a coherent narrative structure. Notably, according to Newman, Blanchard failed to achieve this artistic objective.
VIEWSTAMP Analysis:
There are three main Viewpoints expressed in the passage: The viewpoint of the scholars, who use Blanchard’s fictional worlds to find clues about his life; that of Mark Newman, who illustrates this trend in its most critical form; and that of the author, who clearly believes that critics did not appreciate the poetic brilliance of Andrew Blanchard (lines 12-14).
The Structure of the passage is as follows:
Paragraph 1: Introduce Andrew Blanchard’s work and its critical reception.
Paragraph 2: Exemplify a particularly negative critical view of Andrew Blanchard. The author’s Tone is somewhat condescending (if not overtly hostile) toward Blanchard’s critics, whose “smugness” prevents them from appreciating the brilliance of Andrew Blanchard.
The only implicit Argument is that of the author, who regards the critics’ views as smug and misguided. The author also argues that Blanchard is a brilliant playwright, but does not elaborate upon the qualities that make his work outstanding. The critics’ perspective is outlined in the first paragraph and an example of it is provided in the second, but these are not arguments as much as they are mere viewpoints.
The Main Point of the passage is that the critics did not accord Blanchard the appreciation he deserves.
The Primary Purpose of the passage is to dismiss Blanchard’s critical reception as unappreciative of Blanchard’s poetic brilliance.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
The answer to this Main Purpose question is prephrased in the VIEWSTAMP analysis above.
Answer choice (A) is incorrect, because it describes the purpose of those who criticize Blanchard (lines 7-9), which is not the author’s purpose.
Answer choice (B) is incorrect, because it is Mark Newman, not the author, who seeks to “correct[…] and clarify[…] certain aspects of Blanchard’s biography” (lines 16-17).
Answer choice (C) is the correct answer choice, given the discussion at the end of the first paragraph.
Answer choice (D) is attractive, but incorrect. The author clearly rejects the critics’ views of Blanchard, but there is no evidence that their views amount to a “common misconception.” The extent to which the critics’ position is commonly shared remains unknown. Furthermore, we have no evidence suggesting that Blanchard was a famous playwright. This answer choice fails the Fact Test—twice—and is therefore incorrect.
Answer choice (E) is incorrect, because the passage makes no assertions regarding the factual veracity of the critics’ accusations. The author takes issue with the general direction of their criticism, rather than with the historical accuracy of their observations.
Answer: C
2. Which one of the following summarizes the main point of the passage?
Difficulty Level: 650
Explanation
The answer to this Main Point question is prephrased in the VIEWSTAMP analysis above.
Answer choice (A) is the correct answer choice. The first paragraph outlines the negative critical reception of Andrew Blanchard’s work, and the second paragraph supports this view by describing one study that exemplifies this reception. The author’s own position is revealed in lines 12-14, in which she expresses regret that the critics have not appreciated Blanchard’s “poetic brilliance.”
Answer choice (B) is incorrect. The author neither illustrates nor elaborates on the idea that some of the themes that inhabit Andrew Blanchard’s fictional world are drawn from his criminal past. Even if true, this is not the main point of the passage.
Answer choice (C) is incorrect for two reasons: First, we have no evidence that the author regards Newman’s study as “well-informed.” As an avid fan of Andrew Blanchard’s work, the author would have little appreciation for the views expressed in the study. Second, the main point of the passage is not to discuss Mark Newman’s biography of Andrew Blanchard, which is merely mentioned as an example meant to substantiate a broader claim.
Answer choice (D) is incorrect, because it describes an assumption of the “scholars [who] frequently examine Blanchard’s fictional world for clues that could reveal the ‘real’ story of their author” (lines 7-9). This is not the author’s position, let alone the main point of the passage.
Answer choice (E) is incorrect, because it presents a position most likely shared by some of Blanchard’s critics, not by the author herself.
Answer: A
3. The author most likely uses the phrase “fictional world” (line 6) to refer to
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
The answer to this question should be prephrased. In lines 7-9, the author describes how scholars examine Blanchard’s fictional world looking for clues that could reveal the “real” story of the author. In this context, “fictional world” refers to the body of work produced by Blanchard.
Answer choice (A) is the correct answer choice, as it correctly describes the function of the phrase in the context in which it appears.
Answer choice (B) is incorrect, because the phrase does not reflect a true belief that something is objectively false. Do not be tempted by the use of convoluted language here, unless you can definitively rule out the remaining answer choices.
Answer choice (C) is incorrect, because “fictional world” does not refer to an artistic concept as much as to an actual body of work produced by an artist.
Answer choice (D) is incorrect, because there is no evidence suggesting that Blanchard’s artistic work is potentially deceptive (though the critics might have been deceived by it).
Answer choice (E) is the Opposite answer, because Blanchard is described as a writer with a scandalous life, which does bear some resemblance to the subject matter of his work (lines 1-6).
Answer: A
4. It can be inferred from the passage that Mark Newman would be most likely to agree with each one of the following statements about the work of Andrew Blanchard, EXCEPT:
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
This Subject Perspective-EXCEPT question requires us to identify four statements about Andrew Blanchard that Mark Newman is likely to agree with. Given the structure of the passage, the second paragraph is likely to prove useful in validating the four incorrect answer choices.
Answer choice (A) is incorrect, given Newman’s attempt to expose Blanchard as a “petty thief” (line 19). Clearly, Newman would regard Blanchard’s work as written by someone with a criminal past.
Answer choice (B) is incorrect. Newman argues that only a highly skilled dramaturge can interweave multiple plays-within-a-play and still maintain a coherent narrative structure— something Blanchard clearly failed to do. Given Newman’s negative opinion of Blanchard, it is reasonable to infer that the critic would view Blanchard’s work as produced by a less than highly skilled dramaturge.
Answer choice (C) is the correct answer choice. It is Blanchard’s biography that requires correction and clarification (lines 16-17), not Blanchard’s work as a dramaturge.
Answer choice (D) is incorrect. Newman condemns Blanchard’s plays as “distasteful” (line 21), which is synonymous with “offensive.” It is also clear that Newman regards Blanchard’s foray into meta-theater as a failure, i.e. lacking in coherent narrative structure (lines 25-26).
Answer choice (E) is incorrect, because Newman clearly dislikes Blanchard’s foray into meta-theater, arguing that only a skilled dramaturge can pull it off (lines 22-28).
Answer: C
Hope it helps