JusTLucK04
A & E both..look fine to me...B & D is out for parallelism & meaning...So it might be A for concision
I guess this one has something to do with initial modifier and ", and laugh at themselves" portions..
===========
Hi Mike,
Quite some time since I bothered you..

Hope you are doing fine.
Please give your expert analysis/approach on this one..I am confused between A, D, E. Thanks
Dear
JusTLucK04,
I am quite well, thank you, and I am happy to respond to your p.m.
Here's the question again:
It is important for aspiring comedians to be able to endure criticism, as they will often encounter negative feedback on stage even when the material that they are testing will one day bring them success, and laugh at themselves; in many moments, they may be the only ones laughing.
A) It is important for aspiring comedians to be able to endure criticism, as they will often
B) For aspiring comedians, to be able to endure criticism is important, as they will often
C) The ability to endure criticism is important for aspiring comedians, who will often
D) For aspiring comedians, often it is important that they can endure criticism and
E) For aspiring comedians, it is important to be able to endure criticism; they will often(A) is elegant and natural-sounding. Very nice.
Choices
(B) &
(C) are quite awkward and incorrect.
Part of what's tricky about this question --- when we look simply at the choices
(D) &
(E) themselves, we may or may not see problems, but there are big problems with how these two connect to the rest of the sentence. It's always important to consider how an answer choice plugs into the whole sentence, because sometimes the problem is not in the answer choice
per se but in how it connects to the rest of the sentence.
In
(D), the wording is certainly long-winded and awkward, which makes it suspect, but the real trainwreck is how it connects with the rest of the sentence: "
For aspiring comedians, often it is important that they can endure criticism and encounter negative feedback on stage ..." This one is saying that it is important for the comedians to encounter negative feedback. Hey, comedians, go out there and actively seek out negative feedback! That's a radical change in meaning from the problem, which suggests simply that the negative feedback is inevitable and the comedians just have to learn to deal with it. This is why
(D) is completely wrong.
Choice
(E) has the effect of creating a very choppy sentence. Among other things, it creates a sentence with two different semi-colon breaks. Having multiple semicolons is perfectly fine if, for example, one is listing complex items in series or something like that, but a sentence with (description)-semicolon-(more description)-semicolon-(more description) is too choppy. Furthermore, there's absolutely no reason to insert a semicolon break where a simple conjunction would do. Among other things, the break of the semicolon serves to make less clear the logical link between having to be able to enduring criticism and the inevitability of encountering negative feedback --- (A) puts those in a clear causal relationship, and this is less clear in
(E). For these reasons,
(A) is much much better than
(E).
That's why
(A) is the best answer. As usually, this Veritas question is a high quality question.
Does all this make sense?
Mike