Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Originally posted by Antreev on 13 Jun 2018, 03:16.
Last edited by Antreev on 13 Jun 2018, 10:08, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a5%
b12%
c42%
d8%
e33%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
42%
(01:49)
correct 58%
(01:50)
wrong
based on 131
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Tim was granted a friendly audience with company’s CEO Albert, who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
A) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
B) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
C) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
D) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and in protection of dozens of security officer.
E) who forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
- Verb sequencing Ok. - Meaning through the clause - to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and in protection of dozens of security officer. - is parallel and makes sense.
This SC does not seem reflective of the GMAT. Official SCs do not employ informal expressions such as forked out, nor do they refer to people by their first names. The OA seems to have been plucked from a recent article on the website for CNN (second paragraph). What is the source of this SC?
Tim was granted a friendly audience with company’s CEO Albert, who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
A) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
B) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
C) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
D) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and in protection of dozens of security officer.
E) who forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
Show more
Would agree with GMATGuruNY.. Question doesn't seem to be a SC from a reliable source. More of someones trial at making a question... Original uses "keep them in protection", so it seems to be talking of protection to the money stacked, whereas it the protection is for himself.. C is a straight answer due to parallelism and clear meaning.. to keep him ACCOMMODATED .......and PROTECTED.....
however other choices have not been written in a way to taste your GMAT knowledge..
Tim was granted a friendly audience with company’s CEO Albert, who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
A) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and keep them protected by dozens of security officer.
B) who forked out $2 million for his accommodation in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
C) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
D) who had forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and in protection of dozens of security officer.
E) who forked out $2 million to keep him accommodated in a luxury hotel and protected by dozens of security officers.
Would agree with GMATGuruNY.. Question doesn't seem to be a SC from a reliable source. More of someones trial at making a question... Original uses "keep them in protection", so it seems to be talking of protection to the money stacked, whereas it the protection is for himself.. C is a straight answer due to parallelism and clear meaning.. to keep him ACCOMMODATED .......and PROTECTED.....
however other choices have not been written in a way to taste your GMAT knowledge..
Show more
Although question is not from reliable source, could you please explain to me why E is incorrect? Here, I think simple past is sufficient because no need to specify some event(forked out) is happening first.