OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
Many
full veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending their traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition who views them as being heavily oppressed.
A)
full veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending their traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition
who views them as being heavily
B)
full veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending
her traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition
who views
her as being heavily
C) fully veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending their traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition that views them as being
heavy D) fully veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending their traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition that views them as being heavily
E) fully veiled Muslim women are outspoken in defending
her traditions, especially when confronted with Western opposition that views
her as being heavily
• Split #1: their vs. herThe plural
women requires the plural pronoun
their, not
her.
Eliminate options B and E.
-- In option B, also be wary of "Western opposition WHO." Yes, the opposition is composed of people. But when people form a group (a troupe, a movement, a band), we usually use
that rather than
who. -- Also in option B,
full should be
fully. See #3 below.
• Split #2: heavy vs. heavilyOption C incorrectly uses "heavy oppressed." The correct form is "heavily oppressed."
Heavy is an adjective that modifies a noun:
a heavy suitcase, a heavy load to bear, a heavy blanket.
Heavily is an adverb that modifies the adjective
oppressed (and can modify a verb).
→ We could say that
Western opposition views some Muslim women as being subject to heavy oppression because
oppression is a noun.
→ "Heavy" must modify a noun.
→ "Heavily" can modify an adjective OR a verb.
ELIMINATE C
• Split #3: full vs. fullyOption A incorrectly uses
full veiled rather than
fully veiled.
Veiled is an adjective that needs to be modified by "fully," not "full."
For native speakers, this split would probably be the first.
Fully is an adverb that describes the adjective "veiled."
Full is an adjective that almost always describes a noun.
→ Similar to
fully veiled [adverb + adjective]: Fully clothed. Fully dressed. Fully prepared. Fully exonerated. Fully awake.
→
Full describes nouns: a full container; a full glass; a full stomach; a full order.
A couple of
idioms about which you do not need to worry defy this guideline: a full-blown hurricane or a full-on kiss. GMAC has never tested this kind of idiom.
ELIMINATE A.
The best answer is DNOTESIs the pronoun
them ambiguous?
Good question.
Answer: The pronoun them is almost certainly not ambiguous.
The plural pronoun
them possesses two theoretical plural antecedents:
women and
traditions.
The test for pronoun ambiguity is not whether more than one word matches the pronoun.
The test for pronoun ambiguity is whether more than one word logically could replace that pronoun.
→ Traditions are not the logical target of what Westerners view as being oppressed.
The Westerners view the
tradition that requires women to be fully veiled as
oppressive.
The Westerners view the women who live in a society governed by this tradition as
oppressed.
How could the Westerners view the traditions as oppressed?
The traditions are powerful and working just fine: the traditions require women to be fully veiled, and the women are fully veiled.
Things that have influence, govern society, and work just as intended cannot logically be viewed by outsiders as oppressed.
On the other hand, Westerners could view
women whose traditions require them to cover themselves up as oppressed.
I am not talking about the truth-value of the Westerners' perception.
I am talking about the logical target of the Westerners' opinion.
Traditions
can certainly be oppressed in other contexts—and are. Often. Too often.
But that's another story on a different forum.
BTW (bi-quarterly reminder to all): pronoun ambiguity should be decided last, along with style questions.
COMMENTSCEdward , welcome to SC Butler. I'm glad that you posted.
You raised an issue that I'm sure others wondered about.
These answers range from excellent to outstanding. I cannot bump three of you to Best Reply.
The whole thread is good.
Stay safe, everyone.