Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 03:47

It is currently 01 May 2026, 03:47

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Sentence Correction (SC - EA only)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

May 01
Start your free trial!
11:00 AM PDT
-
12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 03
GMAT 675 with 96th percentile in DI- Kamakshi’s Winning Strategy
12:30 AM EDT
-
01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made wi

Bunuel

Math Expert

Joined: 02 Sep 2009

Last visit: 01 May 2026

Posts: 109,988

Own Kudos:

812,221

[1]

Given Kudos: 105,967

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 109,988

Kudos: 812,221

[1]

13 Aug 2021, 06:00

Kudos

Bookmarks

00:00

Start Timer

Pause Timer

Resume Timer

Show Answer

Hide

Show

History

Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:04) correct

30% (01:17) wrong

based on 129 sessions

History

Date

Time

Result

Not Attempted Yet

Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils.

A. Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils
B. A stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils by using a brush soaked in water
C. Using a brush soaked in water, a person can create a smeared stroke that is made with watercolor pencils
D. Using a brush soaked in water that is made with watercolor pencils, a person can create a smeared stroke
E. Using a brush soaked in water, a person's strokes that is made with watercolor pencils can be smeared

Show Answer

Official Answer

abuc0112

Joined: 18 Jun 2010

Last visit: 01 Sep 2022

Posts: 82

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 28

Posts: 82

Kudos: 90

13 Aug 2021, 06:08

Kudos

Bookmarks

Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils.

A. ~~Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils~~ We need someone to be using a brush. a stroke cannot use a brush
B. ~~A stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils by using a brush soaked in water~~ that is made is modifying smeared
C. Using a brush soaked in water, a person can create a smeared stroke that is made with watercolor pencils
D. ~~Using a brush soaked in water that is made with watercolor pencils, a person can create a smeared stroke~~ that is made is a misplaced modifier
E. ~~Using a brush soaked in water, a person's strokes that is made with watercolor pencils can be smeared~~ we need a person, not the possessives from

Ans: C

Bhu750

Joined: 19 Nov 2020

Last visit: 12 Dec 2023

Posts: 85

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 121

Location: India

Schools: Fuqua '23 MIT MFin "22 Kellogg '23 Johnson '24 McDonough '24 Kellogg (S) LBS '25 (D) Emory 1YR '24 (WL)

GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38 Verified score

GPA: 3.6

Schools: Fuqua '23 MIT MFin "22 Kellogg '23 Johnson '24 McDonough '24 Kellogg (S) LBS '25 (D) Emory 1YR '24 (WL)

GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38 Verified score

Posts: 85

Kudos: 46

[1]

Updated on: 21 Aug 2021, 03:44

Originally posted by Bhu750 on 20 Aug 2021, 16:48.
Last edited by Bhu750 on 21 Aug 2021, 03:44, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos

Bookmarks

Explanation for a different question is posted by mistake I guess

Bunuel

Math Expert

Joined: 02 Sep 2009

Last visit: 01 May 2026

Posts: 109,988

Own Kudos:

812,221

Given Kudos: 105,967

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 109,988

Kudos: 812,221

21 Aug 2021, 03:32

Kudos

Bookmarks

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils.

A. Using a brush soaked in water, a stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils

This answer choice is grammatically incorrect as it incorrectly places a relative clause, which is a noun modifier, after a verb. The relative clause that is made with watercolor pencils is intended to modify the noun stroke. However, it follows the verb smeared.

What helps us identify this question as a Relative Clause question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign: who, which, that, whose, whom

In addition, the question begins with a modifier: Using a brush soaked in water. We can tell it's a modifier as it appears at the beginning of the sentence, is separated from the rest of the sentence by a comma, and there is a verb+ing in it (using). This modifier makes it seem as if a stroke is using a brush, which makes little sense.

A modifier is a Stop Sign. We have to make sure that the modifier is placed right next to the noun it describes.

B. A stroke can be smeared that is made with watercolor pencils by using a brush soaked in water

This answer choice repeats the original relative Clause mistake as it incorrectly places a relative clause, which is a noun modifier, after a verb. The relative clause that is made with watercolor pencils is intended to modify the noun stroke. However, it appears immediately after the verb smeared.

What helps us identify this question as a Relative Clause question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign: who, which, that, whose, whom

C. Using a brush soaked in water, a person can create a smeared stroke that is made with watercolor pencils

The relative clause that is made with watercolor pencils modifies the noun stroke and should therefore appear immediately after it.

In addition the dangling modifier is fixed by specifying who/what is using a brush.

D. Using a brush soaked in water that is made with watercolor pencils, a person can create a smeared stroke

While this answer choice corrects the original dangling modifier error by clarifying who/what is using a brush, this answer choice changes the meaning of the original sentence and makes it illogical. In the original sentence, the stroke is made by watercolor pencils; in this answer choice, the relative clause that is made with watercolor pencils modifies the noun water, indicating that the water is 'made' by watercolor pencils, which is illogical and impossible.

E. Using a brush soaked in water, a person's strokes that is made with watercolor pencils can be smeared

While this answer choice corrects the original Relative Clause mistake and the original dangling modifier error by specifying who/what is using a brush, it is grammatically incorrect. The plural subject strokes does not agree with the singular verb is.

Bunuel

Math Expert

Joined: 02 Sep 2009

Last visit: 01 May 2026

Posts: 109,988

Own Kudos:

812,221

Given Kudos: 105,967

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 109,988

Kudos: 812,221

21 Aug 2021, 03:33

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bhu750

Bunuel

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Urban gentrification, an informal cause for the economic eviction of lower-income residents, a process in which more affluent people acquire housing property cheaply in poor neighborhoods and the entry of upscale businesses and commerce combine driving up real-estate prices, rents, and property taxes.

A. a process in which more affluent people acquire housing property cheaply in poor neighborhoods and the entry of upscale businesses and commerce combine driving

Incorrect.

This answer choice is grammatically incorrect -- it is a fragment.

This sentence is a fragment because the main subject Urban gentrification lacks a conjugated verb that matches it (remember that verbs in modifying and relative clauses do not count here):

Urban gentrification [, an informal cause for the economic eviction of lower-income residents,] a process in which [X].

In addition, the construction combine driving is grammatically incorrect: the modifier driving should be separated from the preceding part of the sentence by a comma.

B. a process in which more affluent people acquiring housing cheaply in poor neighborhoods and the entry of upscale businesses and commerce combine and which drive

Incorrect.

This answer choice repeats the original mistake -- it is a fragment.

In addition, the use of the second relative pronoun and which, creates a parallelism: a process in which ... and which. However, this parallelism introduces a mistake - the singular subject process does not agree with the plural verb drive.

C. is a process where more affluent people acquire cheap housing properties in poor neighborhoods and, combined with upscale businesses and commerce entering, is driving

Incorrect.

While this answer choice corrects the fragment mistake in the original sentence, it either changes the meaning of the original sentence or is grammatically incorrect, depending on how you read it. To understand this double-edged mistake, break down the sentence as follows:

If the final part of the sentence belongs to relative clause, it creates a Subject-Verb Agreement mistake: the singular verb is driving does not agree with the plural subject people.

If, however, the final part belongs to the main clause, it changes the meaning of the sentence. In the original sentence it was affluent people's acquisitions that combined with upscale business entering; however, here it is the process of urban gentrification that combines with upscale business entering.

Urban gentrification, ..., is a process where [..] and, combined with upscale businesses and commerce entering, is driving up [...].

D. a process where the combination of more affluent people acquiring cheap housing properties in poor neighborhoods and upscale businesses and commerce entering drives

Incorrect.

This answer choice repeats the original mistake -- it is a fragment.

This sentence is a fragment because the main subject Urban gentrification lacks a conjugated verb that matches it (remember that verbs in modifying and relative clauses do not count here):

Urban gentrification [, an informal cause for the economic eviction of lower-income residents,] a process in which [X].
In addition, Verb+ing (entering) can be used as a noun replacement only when there's no actual noun. Since there is a real noun -entry- it should be used.

E. is a process in which more affluent people acquiring cheap housing properties in poor neighborhoods and the entry of upscale businesses and commerce combine to drive

This answer choice corrects the fragment mistake in the original question by by adding the verb is in the main clause (Urban gentrification....is a process...).

It also corrects the grammatical construction by changing the faulty construction combine driving to combine to drive. This construction (with conjugated verb + to V) expresses the fact that drive is the result of combine.

Bunuel,

Explanation for a different question is posted by mistake I guess

Posted from my mobile device

________________________________
Fixed. Thank you!