Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:09 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vjsharma25
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Last visit: 21 Oct 2011
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
1,374
 [17]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 88
Kudos: 1,374
 [17]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ulm
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 20 Aug 2019
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
655
 [2]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
Posts: 95
Kudos: 655
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sk818020
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Last visit: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
82
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 38
Kudos: 82
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vjsharma25
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Last visit: 21 Oct 2011
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
1,374
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 88
Kudos: 1,374
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ulm
It's clearly (B)
Consider: apes might have eaten other plants, but scientists can't find any evidences, because these plants didn't leave phytoliths. So the conclusion will be flawed in this case.
The argument says that plants of "certain types" but the answer says that "plant of every type". I got confused by this.Thogh we can reach the answer by POE as none of the other options presents a reasonable/strong assumption.
User avatar
ravsg
Joined: 18 Jan 2011
Last visit: 18 Dec 2015
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 180
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
b - eliminates the possibility that could weaken the conclusion

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
raghavakumar85
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 08 Feb 2012
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Status:Prepping for the last time....
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 70
Kudos: 177
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B helps the argument stand by stating that all plans eaten by apes left phytoliths on teeth. If only some plants ate by apes have phytoliths, the argument will not be valid.

This is a defender type assumption question.
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 755
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 755
Kudos: 4,504
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 B

If some plants don't leave residues, we cannot conclude that there were the only plants consumed.
avatar
spartacus1412
Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Last visit: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clearly after B ..one stops looking at other options
User avatar
dexerash
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Last visit: 05 Sep 2019
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Posts: 76
Kudos: 116
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
easier one but time taking for me..but i got it right..B it is!
User avatar
hangovrlyf
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
Last visit: 30 Apr 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Posts: 10
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
my pick - b ,Sufficient explanation provided :)
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,118
Kudos: 1,277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great ape have on them phytoliths, which are microscopic petrified remains of plants. Since only phytoliths from certain species of plants are found on the teeth, the apes' diet must have consisted only of those plants.

we are told that on FT of ESHGA P was found. P - remains of plants.
Since only P of certain plants are on FT, ESHGA ate only those plants.

that's a pretty bald conclusion. the author makes a giant leap from the facts to the conclusion. thus, the author must assume that all plants have P.


(A) None of the plant species that left phytoliths on the apes' teeth has since become extinct.
we are not concerned of the plants that are extinct. so it is irrelevant.

(B) Plants of every type eaten by the apes left phytoliths on their teeth.
ok, so pretty much what I was thinking during the analysis. If we negate this statement, then not all plants leave P, thus the conclusion that apes ate only specific type of plants is shattered and is no longer valid.

(C) Each of the teeth examined had phytoliths of the same plant species on it as all the other teeth.
irrelevant, nonetheless tempting one. so even if there were more than one species of plants found, it doesn't destroy the conclusion, since the conclusion states that more than one species of plants might have been the source of food for apes.

(D) Phytoliths have also been found on the fossilized teeth of apes of other extinct species.
this one is out of scope.

(E) Most species of great ape alive today have diets that consist of a fairly narrow range of plants.
this one is out of scope.

B is the best answer here.
User avatar
spetznaz
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Last visit: 14 Jul 2024
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B it is .. well explained above !
User avatar
David nguyen
Joined: 15 May 2017
Last visit: 18 Aug 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Status:Discipline & Consistency always beats talent
Location: United States (CA)
GPA: 3.59
WE:Sales (Retail: E-commerce)
Posts: 132
Kudos: 139
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great ape have on them phytoliths, which are microscopic petrified remains of plants. Since only phytoliths from certain species of plants are found on the teeth, the apes' diet must have consisted only of those plants.

F-Teeth -> have Phytoliths
[Certain] Phytoliths -> Found on teeth
Diet -> Only from those Phytoliths

What is the missing link here? Only is a strong word. The conclusion is certain that those plants are the ONLY foods that the apes had eaten. Could it be the case that there are other foods that the apes had eaten? Perhaps they did not leave any remains as evidence. If that was the case then we cannot tell what the apes' diet was like back then.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

Quote:
(A) None of the plant species that left phytoliths on the apes' teeth has since become extinct.
Whether they still exist does not contribute to the proof of the apes' diet. How does its existence help whether other foods left any remains?
Quote:
(B) Plants of every type eaten by the apes left phytoliths on their teeth.
This matches our assumption. Hang on to this.
Quote:
(C) Each of the teeth examined had phytoliths of the same plant species on it as all the other teeth.
As long as there are remains on teeth regardless of 1 or all, the conclusion can be followed. (C) does not affect the conclusion.
Quote:
(D) Phytoliths have also been found on the fossilized teeth of apes of other extinct species.
Other apes are not the concern of the reasoning, herbivorous great ape is.
Quote:
(E) Most species of great ape alive today have diets that consist of a fairly narrow range of plants.
Same error as in (D).

Only B is left. (B) is our answer.
avatar
GMAT0010
Joined: 17 Sep 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2022
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 516
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 104
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The logic is as follows:
Apes eat plant -> P on teeth
P on teeth -> Can know diet of Ape
IF Ape eats plants that don't have P-> Can we know diet ?
NO! :D
Answer is B
Hope this helps!
:D
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,814
Kudos: 51,912
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument in the passage concludes that the diet of an extinct species of herbivorous great ape consisted only of certain species of plants, based on the presence of phytoliths from only those plants on the apes' teeth. The assumption of the argument is that all plants eaten by the apes left phytoliths on their teeth. Thus, the correct answer is (B).

(A) is incorrect because the argument does not depend on whether the plant species that left phytoliths on the apes' teeth are extinct or extant.

(C) is incorrect because the argument does not make any claims about the presence or absence of phytoliths on teeth other than those of the extinct great apes.

(D) is incorrect because the argument only discusses the phytoliths found on the teeth of the specific species of great ape mentioned, not on the teeth of other species.

(E) is incorrect because the argument only concerns an extinct species of great ape, not extant species.

Answer: B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts