Newspaper publishers predict that +10 years from now the percentage of Dom. who
regularly read newspapers will not be lower than it is today.
The evidence given to support this is a survey that indicates that only 10% of Dom. in their 20s read a newspaper regularly, while >50% of Dom. over 30 read regularly.
What could possibly support this assertion made?
(A) The number of Domoricans in their twenties is less than the number of Domoricans over thirty.
If anything this would run counter to the claim.
(B) The number of newspaper published in Domorica has been gradually increasing over the past several decades.
How does an increase in circulation magically lead to an increase in readership?
(C) The proportion of Domoricans in their twenties who regularly read a newspaper has always been low.
This is really just saying that the trend that led to the existing readership of people in their 30s has not changed from what it was. This statement essentially states that trends will continue.
(D) The surveys defined a regular reader of a newspaper as someone who reads a newspaper more than twice a week.
Cool story, but this doesn't SUPPORT the prediction.
(E) The proportion of Domoricans who regularly read a newspaper was higher 20 years ago than it is today.
If anything a declining readership would lead us to believe that the prediction if false.