Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
aurobindomahanty
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 66
12 Jul 2017, 06:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
46% (01:35) correct
54%
(01:49)
wrong
based on 404
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Television host: While it's true that the defendant presented a strong alibi and considerable exculpatory evidence and was quickly acquitted by the jury, I still believe that there must be good reason to think that the defendant is not completely innocent in the case. Otherwise, the prosecutor would not have brought charges in the first place.
The reasoning in the television host's argument is flawed in that the argument
(A) takes lack of evidence for a view as grounds for concluding that the view is false
(B) presupposes as evidence the conclusion that it is trying to establish
(C) places undue reliance on the judgments of an authority figure
(D) confuses legal standards for guilt with moral standards for guilt
(E) concludes that a judgment is suspicious merely on the grounds that it was reached quickly
Source: LSAT
The reasoning in the television host's argument is flawed in that the argument
(A) takes lack of evidence for a view as grounds for concluding that the view is false
(B) presupposes as evidence the conclusion that it is trying to establish
(C) places undue reliance on the judgments of an authority figure
(D) confuses legal standards for guilt with moral standards for guilt
(E) concludes that a judgment is suspicious merely on the grounds that it was reached quickly
Source: LSAT
sobby
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20 (S) Kelley '21 (S) (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
12 Jul 2017, 07:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
aurobindomahanty
this is a good question ..definitely not a sub 600 level .....
""the prosecutor would not have brought charges in the first place""---it reflect that if prosecutor brought case in the court , defendant would be involved in some crime .
it is kind of faith towards the position of lawyer...
A-Television host is not arguing any thing about lack of evidence .
B-out
C- Yes, as per highlighted above
D-nothing about relation of moral and legal standards.
E-it is just a fact that judgement reached quickly ..television host is not arguing on this ...
02 Mar 2018, 05:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
aurobindomahanty
A. He does not take as grounds the lack of evidence. His argument is that prosecutor has brought charges. Out.
B. Conclusion is that the defendant is guilty in the opinion of television host. It simply can not be the evidence. Out.
C. The host says that prosecutor has brought charges ----> the defendant is guilty ---> yes, he relyes to much on prosecutor. True.
D. Nothing about moral in the passage. Out.
E. The information that the judjment was reached quickly is minor. The major information (the grounds) is that prosecutor has brought charges.
