(A) most of the employees at Grodex began in high school to learn the creative thinking skills that they later used on the job - gives no clue about why training sessions should be innovative
(B) corporations that conduct training seminars for employees using innovative educational methods are generally more successful than are corporations that do not conduct training seminars- it doesn't compare between two methods but instead compares 2 different scenarios (innvotive Vs normal training) at different companies-not clear about why training in current company should be through innovative method
(C) less than half of the employees at Grodex regularly attend the company's training seminars- but why training through innovative method is required at current company is not explained by this
(D) the effects of teaching methods in the education of adults are generally very similar to the effects of those methods in the education of children- perfectlytly gives the reasoning for the proposal, as this would help people think creatively which is required in most of the jobs at Grodex
(E) knowing how to think creatively helps people to compensate for deficiencies in memorisation skills- this is a generalised statement, not particularly supporting the proposal in the argument
Don't forget to give kudos if my explanation is helpful

Sent from my Lenovo X3a40 using
GMAT Club Forum mobile app